Zaxx, on 24 March 2018 - 04:49 AM, said:
I agree, the character does not have that provocative aspect... but why would she need it? Come on, it's not the 90s anymore where showing tits and asses is considered provocative,
I didn't say anything about needing her to show tits. Provactive in terms of
her character.
What I said on the subject of T&A was specifically directed at this notion that it's "embarrassing." Which is a load of shit. No, it isn't. The problem with that line of thinking is that it leads to not just a reduction in the amount of skin on show, it effects the way characters are being portrayed too. Women in games seem to only have "angst" and "anger" to work with.
Having the bikini battle-armor sorta tells you about the character "Oh! This is silly, over the top, juvenile, and immature!"
When you put the same character in something far closer to a realistic police/military BDU battle armor look, you're saying "Ah! This is taking itself a little more seriously."
Wanting to play in the same field as Caleb, Wang, Leonard, and Duke Nukem means you gotta step up on that personality. The design from the outset since BS has been tripping over it's own feet. People can't have forgotten just how tremendously bad the backlash for Beta Bombshell was, right? Tonal dissonance. Big time. Ion Maiden managed to save the character from the ashes because it's a good shooter first and foremost. The weakness inherited from her "initial" conceptualization from Bombshell 2015 going forward are the colder look and feel of the character. The color is gone from the design entirely.
Forge, on 24 March 2018 - 05:35 AM, said:
I will go there because I can. Free will and having an opinion still being allowed.
You having an opinion, and you expressing that opinion aren't the issue. You went and edited the quote his post in an infantile, and there was no need for that.
Forge, on 24 March 2018 - 05:35 AM, said:
I don't know what this "embarrassment" line is all about that keeps getting repeated. I don't know what Fred said, and personally I don't give a damn what he said.
He should probably shut the fuck up though, before he alienates potential customers and fans.
Yes, it's what Fred and others have stated in this thread and what I and XmobilemuX were responding to. My issue is, hey, if you don't like the other concepts that's fine. if they're not the way you want to take the character, that's fine, but this post-modern thought process (re: bullshit) that a sexed up character is some how "embarrassing" is the silliest thing I've ever heard. Fred is the last person who should be bringing up embarrassing, and furthermore, i
mplying that there was no other valid course but what we got, or that the "Barberella/Stripperella" inspired version of the character had no merit is based on empty air. We have no idea what that character might have turned out like.
Forge, on 24 March 2018 - 05:35 AM, said:
If you base Shelly off nothing more than shallow fan-boy drool and boobs, she'll have a short shelf-life. It's over-used.
I don't think anyone suggested soley basing her character off her looks. However, people are kidding themselves if they don't think appearance informs characters like this. These are larger than life, pulpy, characters.
Forge, on 24 March 2018 - 05:35 AM, said:
This is allegedly a prequel story, you need to establish a good base attitude and character depth before you worry about fan service with some ass & tit.
I'm about the one of least sjw people on here. I'm not promoting a conservative view of the Shelly character for 'social' reasons. Don't get the issues confused.
Yes, It's a prequel to the Bombshell game. This is pre-war injury, pre-grimdark vendetta against Haskell.
My remarks on the social aspect this are generalities based on the side effects apparent in the way people seem to be thinking about this as a whole, not at anyone in particular.
Forge, on 24 March 2018 - 05:35 AM, said:
She does need to spice up, or get a bit more 'nasty', with her personality.
I don't even know that it's a matter of her needing to get more nasty. She just needs to have more personality. All of her lines in the game at this point are somewhat pedestrian. There's a couple good zingers, but the rest is very blaze.
Forge, on 24 March 2018 - 05:35 AM, said:
(as a side note, I'm surprised somebody already hasn't nuded up the game's splash screen, made her naked & holding a dildo, then posted it all over reddit)
Oh, give them time. I'm sure someone's cooking away.
leilei, on 24 March 2018 - 03:31 PM, said:
Besides, if she were to be 'hot' and had to sell on that, you'd have to deal with that Trespasser trope, or maybe something ridiculous like 'mighty boob engaged' for death smothering or something as depraved.
Well, by that logic, why didn't Duke
have to flex his muscles in Duke Nukem 3D?
I must be coming off as over critical towards IM, and I want to try and correct that impression because I have nothing against what Voidpoint has done. The game is great so far. I just think that the character of Shelly doesn't quite have enough punch, and that's partially because the design still hangs on to what BS did with the character. I will commend VP though for not swinging the pendulum to the other extreme and turning into the very porn parody joke that she could have been.
Anne Lewis, Pamela Anderson, Tank Girl, Sarah Connor...
I'd like to drop another name into this discussion.
Lauren Bacall. I'm almost certain Lani Manilla used her as a reference guide when she played Kimberely Strokes (the general) in Duke Nukem Zero Hour, and it's exactly Bacall's persona that I imagined which would fit a character like Bombshell. Just as Eastwood's gritted teeth hard-assery made for a great "shell" for Duke's character, so to would Bacall.
That's just me though.