[The Commander]

Official video, not some copied one that Fox has posted that has a chance for lost quality and crap overlayed on it.

[Kathy]

At least Fox's version doesn't ask to login.

[The Commander]

Fox's version will get removed from Youtube for copyright.

Why wouldn't you be logged into Youtube/Google...

[Kathy]

NZRage, on 09 July 2013 - 11:34 AM, said:

Fox's version will get removed from Youtube for copyright.

Which would be idiotic considering it's helping market the game.

Quote

Why wouldn't you be logged into Youtube/Google...

Why would you?

[Hank]

Fox, on 09 July 2013 - 06:58 AM, said:

Youtube:

cut ...

Cain't wait to get my hands on this .......................... cheers

[Mr.Deviance]

-

[Mr.Deviance]

NZRage, on 09 July 2013 - 11:34 AM, said:

Why wouldn't you be logged into Youtube/Google...

Because not everbody likes to get tracked by the NSA CIA and all the other pieces of shit that track everybody's net activity and archive it under a list of NICK NAMES associated with their "private" emails and known personal data that can be read by anybody behind the curtain at any time under any type of circumstance.
That's why.
Some people actually like their privacy and don't much care to associate their nicknames or private infos with miserable info trap sites like google, yahoo, facebook, microsoft, twitter etc...
At most I will personally create some incredibly fake and proxyed accounts for those sites if I ever want to post comments or read something in particular that can only be read on those sites.
I hope I was concise enough and that my answer was to the point enough.

[Kathy]

There are also ways to watch 'restricted' youtube videos without logging in - embedded or by using fullscreen switch.

[The Commander]

Mr. D, take the tin foil hat off bro.

[Mr.Deviance]

NZRage, on 10 July 2013 - 04:24 AM, said:

Mr. D, take the tin foil hat off bro.

First I'm not your bro.
Second, I'm not wearing a tin foil hat.
I won't continue this pointless debate with you because it won't lead anywhere.
Once you've been involved and ran up to 10 million user undeground scenes for more than 10 years, then you can talk to me seriously about internet privacy.
Until then, let's just politely end this subject at your bland stereotypical remark that every ignorant person gives when they've reached their limit or want to come off as smart asses and call you the winner and me the paranoid conspiracy freak.

[Inspector Lagomorf]

Back away from the cannabis, my friend...

[Mr.Deviance]

Comrade Major, on 10 July 2013 - 05:13 AM, said:

Back away from the cannabis, my friend...

I don't smoke cannabis, nor do I do any other types of drugs.

[The Commander]

Maybe you should, chill out.
And I do know all this crap, I have been following the whole Kim Dotcom, Prism and that Slodan dude cases closely. But am I paranoid and shit about it? No, why? Because what the fuck is the FBI going to learn from me, absolutely jack shit.
In no way do I try my identity or anything on the net either.
Google CommanderNZ, learn all about me. It doesn't scare me at all.

[Mr.Deviance]

NZRage, on 10 July 2013 - 06:31 AM, said:

Maybe you should, chill out.
And I do know all this crap, I have been following the whole Kim Dotcom, Prism and that Slodan dude cases closely. But am I paranoid and shit about it? No, why? Because what the fuck is the FBI going to learn from me, absolutely jack shit.
In no way do I try my identity or anything on the net either.
Google CommanderNZ, learn all about me. It doesn't scare me at all.

Everybody that posts their shit online brings your argumentation that "so what if they know everything about me, I have nothing to hide"
I have everythign to hide because my personal life is personal.
If you don't treasure your private life, then that is your problem not mine.
I am a self respecting proud person that doesn't like to play by anybody's imposed rules and I like my life to be private no matter if the system won't ever bother me after they get my infos or not.
I refuse to be cataloged and archived in anybody's base.

And on a side note, if you bring up Kim Dotcom, Prism and Slodan as key subjects that are supposed to make me realize that I was mistaken about you and that you actually know what is going on with privacy, I'm sorry to say but you did not convince me at all, on the contrary.
And it's hilarious that you think Kim Dotcom and his new site are not sold out to the CIA in order to track your every move and upload.
If you like your privacy, don't use mega.co.nz that's all you will get form me.
For me this this debate is over.

[Fox]

Do you fear someone know what kind of porn you look at? If you watched South Park you should know you are not special.

Cathy, on 09 July 2013 - 06:58 PM, said:

There are also ways to watch 'restricted' youtube videos without logging in - embedded or by using fullscreen switch.

Just watch my alternate version. That's why a video that requires login is an absolute lack of intelligence.

[Kathy]

Could anyone explain to me what's so bad about watching youtube anonymously?

[Mr.Deviance]

Cathy, on 11 July 2013 - 09:22 AM, said:

Could anyone explain to me what's so bad about watching youtube anonymously?

Nothing. It's actually recommended if you like your privacy, that's what I was saying above.
But apparently if you say this, there are some brainwashed people that are willing to say that you are wearing a tinfoil hat or that you're on drugs.
Amazing how effective brainwashing is today on the masses.

[Inspector Lagomorf]

For being a skilled troll hunter, you are easily trolled.

[Mr.Deviance]

Comrade Major, on 11 July 2013 - 10:35 AM, said:

For being a skilled troll hunter, you are easily trolled.

Chill out, I'm not trolled and I still stand by what I said above don't worry.
I just take this privacy shit seriously and it's my constant life frustration to see people that don't give a shit about their own privacy and then they start lecturing people that do give a shit.
It's a constant recurring theme that I keep seeing and it annoys the shit out of me both online and in real life.
He wasn't trolling, he actually really is oblivious to the lack of privacy that he is exposing himself to, which is ok as long as he doesn't attack people that are defending their privacy because he only ends up being pathetic.

On topic: I wonder if anybody was able to notice if the steering wheels in gta V actually rotate this time around instead of being static like they were in gta IV.
I am curious because due to static steering wheels, I was never able to fully enjoy that gta IV first person mod.
I always like to play racing games with the steering wheel camera so that it feels more like what I'm used to see when I drive in real life.
I have this obsession since back to nfs 1 going through all nfs games midown madness, carmageddon 1 and up until today.
I personally was very happy when GRID was released on pc because it had that steering wheel cam and now when GRID 2 is out since a few months, I haven't even bothered checking it out for the simple reason that it's missing car interiors and a steering wheel camera.
Just like in gta IV I am pretty sure that gta V will get a first person mod that would really benefit this time around from better animations of both characters and cars.
If they make the steering wheels movable too, the first person driving cam for gta V might prove to be a must have mod.

[Hank]

NZRage, on 10 July 2013 - 06:31 AM, said:

And I do know all this crap, I have been following the whole Kim Dotcom, Prism and that Slodan dude cases closely. But am I paranoid and shit about it? No, why? Because what the fuck is the FBI going to learn from me, absolutely jack shit.
In no way do I try my identity or anything on the net either.
Google CommanderNZ, learn all about me. It doesn't scare me at all.

You are missing the point here. There are times you want to go public, and there are times you want to stay private.
I for one am concerned about corporations collecting some data and how this data is being used. When I see a shit load of risky stock offers and my girl gets the latest Clinique and fur offers, we know we are being targeted, via trackers collecting data about how we had spend our time online. This has nothing to do with the FBI or CIA or The White House, but everything with collecting and storing and selling my data. And this I will not accept. Capisce Paisà?

I forgot, Rockstar 'Propaganda' send me the video link of their latest GTA. I did asked them to flood my email with their news, and they delivered. This is how I want my internet, open and honest.

[The Commander]

[Richard Shead]

Still waitin' for that PC announcement...

[The Commander]

Just noticed that picture doesn't load, I guess it doesn't like hot linking.

[X-Vector]

This should work.

[Hank]

Duke Rocks, on 12 August 2013 - 02:48 PM, said:

Still waitin' for that PC announcement...

The last edition, 4, took like 6 month after the release, can you actually hold out that long?

[The Commander]

Yeah now I can see it.
Knowing me I'll probably get it on xbox then the PC.

[Richard Shead]

Hank, on 13 August 2013 - 05:47 AM, said:

The last edition, 4, took like 6 month after the release, can you actually hold out that long?

Absolutely. All I want right now is confirmation that its coming...and some reassurance that it won't be as crappy a port as 4 wouldn't hurt, either.

[The Commander]

I am pretty sure that it won't be a crappy port, they learnt that last time.
Part of the reason Red Dead Redemption hasn't made an appearance on PC.

[Richard Shead]

Here we go...maybe?

[Fox]

X-Vector, on 13 August 2013 - 02:49 AM, said:

This should work.

Spoiler

Smells like one of these awful free-to-play games.