Romulus, on 26 July 2018 - 05:50 AM, said:
Romulus, on 26 July 2018 - 06:51 PM, said:
Those are contradictory statements. You clearly state that you "can show...side by side comparisons" and then refuse to show these very comparisons.
No one here has claimed that the port is flawless. They have simply defended it with objective, replicable evidence. You have offered no objective proof and are refusing to do so, citing your subjective experiences as though they are factual. Noticing a problem and commenting on it was a good start, but there's not much M210 can do with vague claims that the AI is "less potent," "has weird movement," and that the game is just "easier." What you call "proof baiting" is a call for something that can be analyzed and actually fixed.
While I can see where you might have interpreted the three responses to post #707 (your initial post) as being harsh, they were fair in offering rebuttals to your claims. I hardly think that people are trying to mock you or discourage you from playing. On the contrary, I believe that most people in this forum want BloodGDX to be the best it can possibly be, but there's not much that can be fixed without logs, demos, or other evidence. Your initial observation was too broad.
If you ever choose to return to BloodGDX, you might as well record your playtime and cut out a snippet of any anomalous behavior. Perhaps something will come of it.