
Daily DNF Rant Thread "Rants about DNF and its development go here."
#1022 Posted 13 March 2009 - 10:41 AM

EDIT:
I guess that's relevant:

This post has been edited by yossa: 13 March 2009 - 10:43 AM
#1023 Posted 13 March 2009 - 10:47 AM
/me hereby complains about those two Twitters.
#1024 Posted 13 March 2009 - 10:50 AM

#1025 Posted 13 March 2009 - 11:06 AM
trackit, on Mar 13 2009, 07:50 PM, said:

Yeah, I call it Twittler.
#1026 Posted 13 March 2009 - 01:03 PM
Kristian Joensen, on Mar 13 2009, 09:47 PM, said:
/me hereby complains about those two Twitters.
But, Kristian, that's a legitimate complain since George posted his Twat in DNF subforum.
#1027 Posted 13 March 2009 - 01:05 PM
We have some DNF updates and some personal updates, deal with it.
#1028 Posted 13 March 2009 - 01:40 PM
Lotan, on Mar 13 2009, 09:03 PM, said:
Since he said he might do some DNF development updates and guess what ? He DID do that. Several actually, probably more than he has done in a similar period of time.
But like I said I SHARE in that complaint.
#1029 Posted 13 March 2009 - 02:57 PM
Kristian Joensen, on Mar 13 2009, 11:40 PM, said:
But like I said I SHARE in that complaint.
its just we hoped that "development updates" will be just a liiiiiitle more substantial

I remember only one worthy twitter update, the one where he revealed some todo list or something and you could gess from that about some features being in the game.
On the other hand im not following his twitter page though, so i may be mistaken

My point was that when he announced his twitter page on DNF forum and said that he will be updating it with DNF development updates from time to time, then of course everybody thought that they will be getting some worthy information from his twitter page.
This post has been edited by trackit: 13 March 2009 - 03:00 PM
#1030 Posted 14 March 2009 - 03:15 AM
Lotan, on Mar 11 2009, 06:13 AM, said:
Maybe because there is not much people left who are willing to damage their reputation with working on that "industry joke" game that never ships.
And i dont want to "just offend" anyone, im being serious here. I think the more time passes without anything shipping the less people are willing to work on it. I mean who wants an industry joke on their resume that everyone will laugh at "ha, ha, ha, ha... so you are one of those who didnt manage to ship a game that was in development for 13 years" So i guess if another mass exodus happens then they can have hard time finding replacement.
This post has been edited by trackit: 14 March 2009 - 03:26 AM
#1031 Posted 14 March 2009 - 06:24 AM
#1032 Posted 14 March 2009 - 06:32 AM
#1033 Posted 14 March 2009 - 11:02 AM
Kristian Joensen, on Mar 14 2009, 04:32 PM, said:
yap, but that was in the past... when there was hope that DNF will ship and kick ass. Last mass exodus was 4 years ago if i remember correctly. Right now the development time is getting plain rediculous and there is still no light in the end of the tunnel.
This post has been edited by trackit: 14 March 2009 - 11:03 AM
#1034 Posted 14 March 2009 - 10:37 PM
Also in the case of DNF it's been fairly obvious over time that any delays are due to management\director calls, and their quality\taste requirements and such. Nobody can seriously suggest that the reason for the delay is simply because they happened to have some misfortune of hiring a bunch of people who work insanely slow.
#1035 Posted 15 March 2009 - 03:35 AM
Lead, on Mar 15 2009, 09:37 AM, said:
Yes. But still, I would rather wprk at the company that releases games that I helped develop.
Quote
Of course it's management.
Although, Scott Miller two years ago said that hiring unexperienced workers was one of the reasons DNF is still in development. People weren't happy by that. And I agree with them.
#1036 Posted 15 March 2009 - 04:17 AM
#1037 Posted 15 March 2009 - 04:35 AM
maybe they aren't as advanced with the game as we think, maybe they have to reach a certain milestone to get the word out there?
#1038 Posted 15 March 2009 - 06:52 AM
Kristian Joensen, on Mar 15 2009, 03:17 PM, said:
Yes. But the first thing he said was about workers. While he did say that in a manner "we were wrong", but it wasn't really heartwarming to the crew.
Jeez. I recall my thoughts two years ago about this matter. I was like "he said it was their fault, not workers', why are they so mad?". And now I'm moving towards the point of view of workers. I'm SO biased...
#1040 Posted 15 March 2009 - 07:05 AM
#1041 Posted 15 March 2009 - 07:22 AM
crunchysuperman, on Mar 15 2009, 02:55 PM, said:
You still haven't got any evidence at all

But seriously we do know that ofcourse there have been changes since then.
#1042 Posted 15 March 2009 - 07:44 AM

This post has been edited by trackit: 15 March 2009 - 07:45 AM
#1043 Posted 15 March 2009 - 08:58 AM
Anyway, we already discussed it in this very thread months ago. If there is some connection of mass exodus with possible restart then it's more like "exodus, thus restart", not the other way around. And most likely, that's not the case either.
This post has been edited by Lotan: 15 March 2009 - 08:59 AM
#1044 Posted 15 March 2009 - 10:00 AM
Lotan, on Mar 15 2009, 06:58 PM, said:
What makes you think that? for me it seems more logical that after another stupid decision people got fed up and desperate that this game will never ship and just left. Its not logical for people to leave when everything is finally going smoothly and the game is going to ship soon. Besides, 3DR pays bonuses to employees from profit that game makes (that they where involved in).
This post has been edited by trackit: 15 March 2009 - 10:01 AM
#1045 Posted 15 March 2009 - 10:12 AM
#1046 Posted 15 March 2009 - 11:04 AM

I'm telling you they didn't, the game they are finishing up right now is great enough and George and the Co. are very confident with the current build of the game.
They aren't stupid to throw away such a great amount of epic progress away for nothing. Just wait a little dudes, you're going to get all the info and media you ask for this year...

#1047 Posted 15 March 2009 - 11:19 AM
Kristian Joensen, on Mar 15 2009, 08:12 PM, said:
i didnt say that it was restart 100%, i said that if not restart then it was something else that clearly set back the release for several years.
Kristian Joensen, on Mar 15 2009, 08:12 PM, said:
You mean people who have signed Non Disclousure Agreements?

This post has been edited by trackit: 15 March 2009 - 11:19 AM
#1048 Posted 15 March 2009 - 11:28 AM
trackit, on Mar 15 2009, 09:00 PM, said:
They left within several months. If there was some critical decision that led to the exodus, then it wouldn't have been in several months. Although, Shack said about some departures had occured in several days.
Either way, I recommend reading http://www.shacknews...n.x?story=43655. With comments of course.
#1049 Posted 15 March 2009 - 11:43 AM
trackit, on Mar 15 2009, 07:19 PM, said:
You mean people who have signed Non Disclousure Agreements?

What I was referring to their was the fact that BOTH Scott Miller AND Charlie Wiederhold mention noobs slowing them down. That is all that has ever been publicly stated by anyone as a reason, but it is something that has been stated by BOTH sides and hence can't be dissmissed as bias(Which isn't logical fallacy anyway).
#1050 Posted 15 March 2009 - 11:59 AM
Btw, thread about that was nuked on 3dr forums.
rockmx8, on Mar 15 2009, 10:04 PM, said:
Yeah, and fuck you too.