Psyrgery, on May 15 2009, 07:28 PM, said:
...because you know everything, don't you?
EVERYBODY on each side should stfu, as there are no official statements. Yeah, there's this Sue against 3DR, but that's 3DR AND Take2 business, not ours.
I've bashed George as well, but I preffer to stay low until news come to us.
Maybe they'll surprise us, and by they I mean 3DR OR Take2.
My thoughts exactly.
Babe, on May 15 2009, 07:33 PM, said:
Question is how much 3DR got from the first publisher GT interactive ? If they did get some money from GTI , which I assume they did, then they did had an obligation towards GTI. And if GTI (later Infgrames) has sold those rights to Take 2, then 3DR is indeed obligated towards Take 2 as they have the publishing rights now. And why should Take 2 pay 3DR money when all it wanted was the publishing rights and it bought those rights off from Infograemes ?
If 3DR did indeed took some advances from it's intial publisher GTI, it is obligated to to give them a game, and if by change of handes Take 2 is the publisher now, 3DR is indeed obligaed to give Take 2 a complete game. I dont think 3DR can say secrew you Mr. Take 2 because we didnt have an aggreement with you in the first place, because Take 2 has acquired the right by purchasing it off from Infogrames, and purchasing the right from Infogrames was a legally right purchase.
mrsunshines is right on his point, "Any publisher would be furious if the developer suddenly posted on their website "Thanks for being fans and for all your support" after announcing they we're broke and no product being released."
To be honest this is the first time I can recall a publisher suing a developer for something like this. A lot of cases where the publisher stops funding a game of some developer which ends with the developer getting forced to close but never any publisher also demeanding their money back. and in this case there wasen't even any ongoing funding.
As far as waht 3DR ows Take 2 thats all up to what the contract says. If it simply states that the publisher has exclusive rights to distribute the game when/if the game is done then they don't have jack shit on 3DR. On the other hand if it does say something about the game being released by some date or some such they have all the right to sue 3DR.
Without knowing the terms of the contract it's imposible for us to know who if anyone has breached it. This goes for both the Take 2 and 3DR bashers, you all sound like whiny bitches.
As much as I hate the development of this mess I ain't going to point any fingers without knowing all the facts, that would just be stupid. Take Two is maybe my favourite among the big publishers and 3D Realms has obviously made their share of mistakes but in the end they are very pasionate about the games they have developed and produced and it has showed in pretty much all games they have had a major say in.