JohnClay, on 14 February 2012 - 07:01 PM, said:
I'd like to take you up on that bet... it's ridiculous.... I mean Fresch thinking "I know! I'll delete *all* of my blog posts just so that some crazy people will think Gearbox pressured me to do it - I'll just let them connect the dots on their own!" (BTW the rest of his website is still there)
Fresch is a drama queen. A drama queen will do anything, like wear fishnet t-shirts.
JohnClay, on 14 February 2012 - 07:01 PM, said:
That suggests that there was a lot of truth in his blog since I don't know how you could break a NDA with heaps of lies (otherwise it would be called "defamation").... and I'm glad that he would want to break a NDA because I want to know what happened to DNR.
You don't know what an NDA is. An NDA means you don't talk about it,
period. Truth, lies, it don't matter. And that is likely the case, since Gearbox isn't talking about it either. Fresch likely signed the NDA not knowing what it was or thinking that legal binding documents aren't serious business. It's obvious he didn't have a lawyer (or at least a good one.)
BugsBunny, on 14 February 2012 - 07:55 PM, said:
I am glad you stated that it is an ASSUMPTION. I haven't seen any such media. May be you have in your dreams ? The only soundless video in Youtube no body knows how old that build is. And the images floating around are quite good for an alpha version of a product.
Here comes the hint express, last stop you! That IS all the media. Oh yeah, and tons of stupid concept art. It's obvious they did dick all in terms of progress.
BugsBunny, on 14 February 2012 - 07:55 PM, said:
You still dont know what an alpha version of a software is, how so ever it is close to the finished product it is. Alpha is still alpha, not Beta, not Release Candidate. Often hundreds are bugs are fixed in last few days before a software goes from RC to final retail version. What TerminX played is still Alpha version.
You missed the part where it was rather close to the first estimated release and they still didn't have a programmer. Nonexistent programming is not a 'bug'. Do you know how much time it takes to program something? I doubt it. Besides, the point is more of that they didn't have shit to show, which means that Gearbox was probably "blown away" by how little progress had been made.
BugsBunny, on 14 February 2012 - 07:55 PM, said:
Again you are assuming that out of your ass. Sure Gearbox has not lent you the hat you are wearing ? I am atleast trying to connect the dots. You are completely ignoring the dots with assumptions after assumptions out of your ass.
You're a total derp. I'm the one assuming when all of you are
so sure big bad Gearbox Software ruined your perfect game. At least my
assumptions are presented as such, not as fact, and I actually base my assumptions in REALITY and
things that we know. You guys are acting like 9/11 Conspiracy Theorists. What next, Randy Pitchford bombed Interceptor's basement studio? Besides, I say fuck Gearbox, but seriously you have to give the Devil his due. Gearbox behaved and responded pretty much like any other company preoccupied with a marketing cycle would have. They don't have time for peanuts when steak is on the table.
BugsBunny, on 14 February 2012 - 07:55 PM, said:
It is already proved if you open your eyes, or is it still covered by the Gearbox hat ? Why else would Gearbox start flying ban hammers at members trying to discuss the topic and delete the topic. If they are honest and nothing to hide, they should not delete the topic in their forums and be banning members who are trying to discuss the topic. And probably should have come out with a sugar coated PR statement to present their side of the story.
Once again, NDAs. And who gives a shit if Gearbox bans people? It's their fucking forums, they can do whatever they want.
BugsBunny, on 14 February 2012 - 07:55 PM, said:
LOL you must do the job of a lawyer. You have great powers of twisting simple facts from day to night. Here a guy has worked for one year for free, and the company says, I quote "We can’t give you an answer to that. Of course you can keep working on it, if you want to. But we can’t tell you if we will allow the game to be released." And you call Fresch the bully ?!
Yeah, he is because they told him to hold on in the first place, and he refused. He is not the owner of Duke Nukem, if he wants to do things his way Gearbox was justified in telling him to kindly fuck off.
Hank, Valentines Day is faggotry I will not partake in.