Duke4.net Forums: Gta 5 ! GTAV ! Grand Theft Auto Five ! - Duke4.net Forums

Jump to content

  • 8 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Gta 5 ! GTAV ! Grand Theft Auto Five !

User is offline   TerminX 

  • el fundador

  #31

View PostDanM, on 24 November 2011 - 01:57 AM, said:

So i was quizing the EB guy today cause the pre-order box for gtav PC was on the shelf, and he had it in his system as the usual 31/12/12 date as a placeholder, but i think this gta could have perhaps a 2 week wait at the longest between consoles and the pc version.

And that's how it should be... no more exclusive version for one of the consoles followed by 6 months until it's out on the other consoles and ANOTHER 6 months after that until it's out on the PC. PC gamers need to be first class citizens... we have hardware that's 10x as fast and all of the damn games are developed on a PC anyway!
1

User is offline   Stabs 

#32

Actually iam thinking they might be going for the usual cash cow via console's and also selling themselves to PC gamers via dx11 features/steam which i think could a major selling point for us.
0

User is offline   Martin 

#33

Well, yeah. You can have the most super-buff PC, but no game really makes the most of it. What you get is console games with extra glitz. The 'PC-only' market is now relegated to World of Warcraft and things like that. Good games are ones that are ported up from console. That's just the way it is. You won't see a big jump in the quality of PC games until the next batch of consoles, and that's no coincidence. Even then, the days of PC games really pushing the upper-echelons of PC hardware are gone. What you get now is console games with better graphics, but still essentially the same games.
0

#34

View PostMartin, on 06 December 2011 - 07:04 PM, said:

Well, yeah. You can have the most super-buff PC, but no game really makes the most of it. What you get is console games with extra glitz. The 'PC-only' market is now relegated to World of Warcraft and things like that. Good games are ones that are ported up from console. That's just the way it is. You won't see a big jump in the quality of PC games until the next batch of consoles, and that's no coincidence. Even then, the days of PC games really pushing the upper-echelons of PC hardware are gone. What you get now is console games with better graphics, but still essentially the same games.

I do have the most super-buff PC and I don't mind playing multiplatform games on it. I've seen shitloads of games on consoles that are supposed to work beautiful out of the box, yet they stutter like mad while also being locked at just 30 fps and all that running with graphics that can also be compared to the lowest settings of their pc counterparts.
The only games that actually look decent and play decent on consoles as far as I'm concerned are their first party games.
Back in ps1 and ps2 days, almost all of the games found on consoles, were console exclusives and they looked and played exceptionally well.
Also the idea of being limited only to a gamepad at all times when it comes to fps games or rts games and the idea of not even having a small chance or hope to see the games modded, is another thing that makes me reject consoles as being the proper tools to play games these days.
If I buy consoles, it's because I want to play console exclusive games, not because I see any benefit in them as playing all of my games with them.
I never did see a benefit in poping in a game disk and start playing.
I never did mind the time it takes for a game to install to the hdd so I can start playing it on demand, every time I click it's shortcut.
Gta5 will obviously get modded to hell and back on pc and missing out on all that fun is not something I intend to do.

This post has been edited by Mr.Deviance: 06 December 2011 - 11:24 PM

0

User is offline   Yatta 

  • Pizza Lawyer

  #35

View PostDanM, on 05 November 2011 - 01:36 PM, said:

http://i.imgur.com/MARJ2.png
leaked map

interesting speculation
http://i.imgur.com/MARJ2.png

bloody PETA, i want a shepherd damnit


Juicy info sounds exciting. I'm stoked!
0

#36

View PostYatta, on 06 December 2011 - 11:21 PM, said:

Juicy info sounds exciting. I'm stoked!

You are kind of late with that quote.
I'm pretty sure that all the shit written there, as well as that "leaked" blurry map of the game, were proven to be bullshit.
0

User is offline   Yatta 

  • Pizza Lawyer

  #37

Well maybe Rockstar will take suggestions. Some of those features aren't at all bad. :)
0

User is offline   The Commander 

  • I used to be a Brown Fuzzy Fruit, but I've changed bro...

#38

Pfft, R* aint going to be taking "suggestions" at this stage now for GTA V, everything would be done by now.
They would be going through now doing voice overs, bug tweaks and other shit.
0

#39

View PostThe Commander, on 07 December 2011 - 09:17 AM, said:

Pfft, R* aint going to be taking "suggestions" at this stage now for GTA V, everything would be done by now.
They would be going through now doing voice overs, bug tweaks and other shit.

Most likely, going on a submission spree for microsoft and sony.
Passing a submission with such a complex engine and game is obviously a challenge due to all the areas from where bugs spawn unexpectedly.

This post has been edited by Mr.Deviance: 07 December 2011 - 10:34 AM

0

User is offline   Green 

  #40

New Screenshots:

Posted Image
Posted Image
2

User is offline   TerminX 

  • el fundador

  #41

Whoa, that looks awesome. I was already looking forward to this, but I'm looking forward to it even more now!
0

User is offline   Hool 

#42

TakeTwo stocks have fallen to the lowest since September 2010 and it's still declining, if it falls any lower then Rockstar have to release more information. Well, according to some people on a GTA forum that is.
0

User is offline   Green 

  #43

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
2

User is offline   Lunick 

#44

Dat Ass
1

User is offline   Inspector Lagomorf 

  • Glory To Motherland!

#45

I don't see anything that makes me say "Holy shit, I really need to get this game" yet. Perhaps I'm still recovering from the letdown of GTA4 for the PC.

Edit: God forbid I have an opinion, right s.b. Newsom?!?!

This post has been edited by Achenar: 22 August 2012 - 10:00 AM

-2

#46

View PostAchenar, on 21 August 2012 - 05:01 AM, said:

I don't see anything that makes me say "Holy shit, I really need to get this game" yet. Perhaps I'm still recovering from the letdown of GTA4 for the PC.

I had an outdated high end pc at the time of GTA4's release date and I bought high end components for a new pc 3 months after teh game came out.
By the time I got the new components, the game had already received a few patches and I was able to play it maxed out without the slightest of problems.
The way it uses that rockstar app, I can understand that it felt like a burden to get the game started but overall as drivers matured and as patches came out, the game performance got better and better.


Considering that GTA 5 seems to use and updated version of the same engine used in GTA 4 , there is probably going to me a lot of modding again.

Gta 4 with enough mods can look close to photorealistic and can still push even the highest end components of today!
Check these screenshots made with some mods in GTA 4 and you will notice that GTA5 has a long way to go before it can look like this while being vanilla.
http://img-fotki.yan...d_b56e0dcc_XXXL
http://img-fotki.yan...7a1413_orig.jpg
http://img-fotki.yan...cf3bed8f_XL.jpg
http://data18.galler...x740-u80c4c.jpg
http://img-fotki.yan...ea82074e_XL.jpg
http://data18.galler...x740-u410e4.jpg
http://img-fotki.yan...1_a098ff36_XXXL
http://img-fotki.yan...41e3da3c_XL.jpg
http://img-fotki.yan...10e37c3b_XL.jpg
http://i1122.photobu...iper_fahrt2.jpg
http://data18.galler...x740-u0e41d.jpg
http://img-fotki.yan...e_1041cb7d_XXXL

This post has been edited by Mr.Deviance: 21 August 2012 - 06:35 PM

1

User is offline   Inspector Lagomorf 

  • Glory To Motherland!

#47

View PostMr.Deviance, on 21 August 2012 - 06:31 PM, said:

Posted Image


;)
I'm not a graphics nut but that is seriously really fucking impressive.
This really is what GTA5 should have looked like to begin with, I think.

This post has been edited by Achenar: 21 August 2012 - 06:37 PM

0

User is offline   thatguy 

#48

Eff GTA4 mods. Its not a new GTA game. lol I really can't wait for the new GTA. The premise sounds really awesome.

In respects to GTA4 PC....I never had a problem. Great game. Best GTA in the series next to San Andreas. Its all about creating a living open world and make a deep emotional story.
0

User is offline   Kathy 

#49

View Posts.b.Newsom, on 22 August 2012 - 12:20 AM, said:

In respects to GTA4 PC....I never had a problem. Great game. Best GTA in the series next to San Andreas. Its all about creating a living open world and make a deep emotional story.

Indeed, casually killing people in hundreds does provide a good potential for a deep emotional story.
3

User is offline   Martin 

#50

GTA V won't look like that because Rockstar would like to sell some copies on PC. Not everyone has a PC which can hold those graphics in a GTA-style game. I'd wager that most don't. So if R* don't want to make any money on PC, they should max out all the graphics!
0

User is offline   LkMax 

#51

View PostMartin, on 22 August 2012 - 08:47 AM, said:

GTA V won't look like that because Rockstar would like to sell some copies on PC. Not everyone has a PC which can hold those graphics in a GTA-style game. I'd wager that most don't. So if R* don't want to make any money on PC, they should max out all the graphics!

Options menu > Graphics > Recommended for your hardware
1

#52

View PostMartin, on 22 August 2012 - 08:47 AM, said:

GTA V won't look like that because Rockstar would like to sell some copies on PC. Not everyone has a PC which can hold those graphics in a GTA-style game. I'd wager that most don't. So if R* don't want to make any money on PC, they should max out all the graphics!

They don't hold back on pc graphics due to your given reason, I'm pretty sure of that.
As LkMax said, don't forget that games on pc can have graphics options.
The reason why gta5 won't look so much better, is because the game is being developed at the console hardware limitation standards and then the pc version benefits from extra shaders and higher res textures, nothing more.
To get those exceptional level of graphics, the game needs to be made with pc in mind as the main platform and we all know that's not going to happen.

This post has been edited by Mr.Deviance: 22 August 2012 - 09:49 AM

0

User is offline   Inspector Lagomorf 

  • Glory To Motherland!

#53

View PostMartin, on 22 August 2012 - 08:47 AM, said:

GTA V won't look like that because Rockstar would like to sell some copies on PC. Not everyone has a PC which can hold those graphics in a GTA-style game. I'd wager that most don't. So if R* don't want to make any money on PC, they should max out all the graphics!


Even low-end computers nowadays can handle games like GTA4 or Crysis.
0

User is offline   Martin 

#54

View PostMr.Deviance, on 22 August 2012 - 09:48 AM, said:

They don't hold back on pc graphics due to your given reason, I'm pretty sure of that.
As LkMax said, don't forget that games on pc can have graphics options.


Truth. I hadn't thought of this.

View PostMr.Deviance, on 22 August 2012 - 09:48 AM, said:

The reason why gta5 won't look so much better, is because the game is being developed at the console hardware limitation standards and then the pc version benefits from extra shaders and higher res textures, nothing more.
To get those exceptional level of graphics, the game needs to be made with pc in mind as the main platform and we all know that's not going to happen.



Well, by the looks of things a thriving modding community will add those graphics. I still think vanilla GTA IV looks amazing.
0

User is offline   Green 

  #55

Posted Image
Posted Image
Posted Image
4

User is offline   Martin 

#56

I'm sorry, but even vanilla it looks badass!

This post has been edited by Martin: 22 August 2012 - 03:29 PM

0

#57

I see this time around they focused a lot on architecture and geography.
I'm also under the impression that this time around, their euphoria engine has been implemented even deeper into character animations than it was in gta 4.
These things are certainly stuff that can't be added to gta 4 through mods and it's a welcome improvement.
RockStar should realize that what makes gta sequels worth it, is not just the story but also the improvements that can't be added through mods.
We all know that all gta games since gta 3 have been modded like mad to add higher res graphics and new cars or skins, yet the series still manages to impress with each release.

This post has been edited by Mr.Deviance: 23 August 2012 - 04:48 AM

0

#58

Why do the trees look so weird in the second picture?
Anyway, i've never really liked gta. Sure this game has good graphics, but i can find better graphics, and with better gameplay too. So i'm gonna pass on this once again
0

User is offline   zwieback 

#59

i loved them all. the new one looks even more awesome. ;)
0

User is offline   Engel220 

#60

More new screenshots here;

http://www.rockstarg...1/business.html

R* also said on Facebook, "We will be back with some more in a few weeks or so".
0

Share this topic:


  • 8 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic


All copyrights and trademarks not owned by Voidpoint, LLC are the sole property of their respective owners. Play Ion Fury! ;) © Voidpoint, LLC

Enter your sign in name and password


Sign in options