[K100]

The Commander, on 30 October 2011 - 09:52 AM, said:

Link doesn't work, people should stop using megaSHIToad and use something better like mediafire.

It work now.

[The Commander]

K100, on 30 October 2011 - 10:32 AM, said:

It work now.

No its not and its not working for DanM either, put it on mediafire or somewhere else.

[K100]

I will upload it on youtube.

[K100]

[zwieback]

DanM, on 30 October 2011 - 10:03 AM, said:

i could be wrong seeing as randy can't see much further than his head which has assimilated with his anal passage.

you sir just made me laugh out loud.

Quote

It's pretty simple. They quit the project because the license (that they have had from the time they announced the project and according to their given-version of events has always been the same) did not say they could release it. My point was that they never should have signed onto the contract if there was an issue with it. My point is that they hired shitty lawyers and/or are really stupid.

exactly. also - what i pointed out earlier they decided to GO with the license and now more or less cancelled the project which is the worst of all cases.

[Night Wolf]

K100, on 30 October 2011 - 11:46 AM, said:

That ripper looks like ass

[Micky C]

Another problem is that we don't know how many of those textures are made by the Reloaded team, and how many are place holder and need to be created.

And the whole pipe bomb animation of throwing the pipe bomb and the 'cool' flip of the detonator is the dodgiest animation I've ever seen. Even Australia's former Prime Minister can throw better than that, not that he can throw very well...

[Jimmy]

LOL. I count the screenshots deceptive. Looks like shit.

[Lunick]

[Martin]

[Graywolf]

I Wonder what happened to the "stay tuned" and "next week news"?

[Jimmy]

You didn't see it? There is no news. There was never any news, ever.

[Ronin]

Martin, on 02 November 2011 - 11:47 PM, said:

That was funny,

[Fox]

Captain Awesome, on 03 November 2011 - 01:06 PM, said:

You didn't see it? There is no news. There was never any news, ever.

Precisely, it's ridiculous how this fresch guy comes here and tell lies after lies. I mean, there are a lot of noobs on the Internet making up stuff, however supposedly he is using his real photo or name while "working" on DNR, so how can he just be telling these fake histories like that?

[Kathy]

Yeah, what a shock. I always thought only anonymous people can tell lies.

[Mr.Deviance]

I see Fresch got properly lynched since I last posted here.
If this forum was real life, I bet he would look like Gaddafi right now.

[Fox]

Helel, on 04 November 2011 - 12:59 AM, said:

Yeah, what a shock. I always thought only anonymous people can tell lies.

No, but this may come up when he tries to get a license for another project, or even a job...

[Ronin]

Mr.Deviance, on 04 November 2011 - 05:47 AM, said:

I see Fresch got properly lynched since I last posted here.
If this forum was real life, I bet he would look like Gaddafi right now.

Funny image in my head right now of this, yet he still has the licence? Im sure the negative reaction has not gone unnoticed by the Gearbox marketers/spys/minions. They probably told him to remove that post or Randy will come round to his house with the boys, or else he just shat himself and removed it himself. Either way it was a weak move that deserves nothing but contempt.

Someone seriously needs to revoke that licence. I wonder will fresch be back to intercept any more of his posts?

[TerminX]

An anonymous little birdie told me something the other day that suggested the license has in fact been revoked. No idea if there's any truth to it since I don't know who it was.

[Kathy]

What was the point of licence if it didn't allow release?

[Ronin]

Helel, on 04 November 2011 - 07:26 AM, said:

What was the point of licence if it didn't allow release?

Im sure they would have allowed release but in their own time on their terms. Like it or not its Gearboxs IP now, you cannot ask them for a favour then pressure them for more or hold a gun to their heads.

Interceptor : We wont work on the game more until you gaurantee us a release.

Gearbox : Fine, fuck off then.

You see Gearbox were never going to gaurantee a release until they felt like it, it would have had to be subject to quality control etc, and not interfere with their plans.

@ TX , that does not suprise me at all, I could see that comming the way this fiasco was handled.

[Jimmy]

Helel, on 04 November 2011 - 07:26 AM, said:

What was the point of licence if it didn't allow release?

Because Gearbox didn't want to release it. Which is why I say Fresch and Co. are either really evil or really stupid.

[Mad Max RW]

Captain Awesome, on 04 November 2011 - 01:58 PM, said:

Because Gearbox didn't want to release it. Which is why I say Fresch and Co. are either really evil or really stupid.

My money is on stupid. Now he's trying to rewrite history by censoring himself so any future projects aren't immediately shot down. Fresch and Interceptor Entertainment will be back next year with a whole new look, probably a different name, and any connections to Duke Reloaded will be scrubbed from history or completely fictionalized in their favor. Ideally they want to build up a new totally ignorant fan-base. I can already see the flame wars incited by people trying to educate the clueless morons who follow them.

[ThePinkus]

What post was deleted?

[TerminX]

The one where fresch posted some bullshit and then just changed it to say "edited" later.

Sorry, I guess that didn't narrow it down much.

[Fox]

Helel, on 04 November 2011 - 07:26 AM, said:

What was the point of licence if it didn't allow release?

Because Gearbox doesn't want them to do whatever they want. First because of quality control, second because they want to think before release if it will affect sells of any of their games.

While I doubt DNR would pass the quality control, probably Gearbox would never allow anything to be released considering their money-making minds.

[Jimmy]

Here is Fresch's deleted post, which I had quoted before he deleted it.

fresch, on 25 October 2011 - 07:52 AM, said:

The license doesn't allow us to release the game. That's why we decided to put it on hold. It has nothing to do with screenshots or media.
An IP license often doesn't state whether you can release a product or no - Its obvious that a license is granted with a release in mind.
But that was apparently not the case with Reloaded. The license allowed us to "Create" Reloaded. But not release it. Ever.

[Kathy]

What a shitty licence it was. As someone else pointed earlier you can create just for yourself whatever you want without any licence. And that's what Interceptor were basically doing.

[thelegend4ever]

From the sounds of things on how the game was already playing, maybe GBX actually made a wise decision to prohibit a release...

[mechmorphix616]

ozz, on 01 November 2011 - 07:44 PM, said:

That ripper looks like ass

I agree. The Ripper made me go WTF too.