Duke Nukem Reloaded abandoned? "An interesting facebook post."
#392 Posted 26 December 2011 - 09:38 AM
Lunick, on 24 December 2011 - 07:53 PM, said:
I'd suggest downloading the 720 although the 1080 option is there.
This is restarted.
I can try to understand Interceptor and fresch's ego maniacal motives, but not why Gearbox would force the issue on this forum (I assume the tilted comment was added my a mod or admin)
So, as of 26 Dec 2011 Fuck Gearbox. Reason: You are protecting an irrelevant footage of an abandoned project, and make this looser (fresch) more important as he ought to be. The only reason everyone wants to see this shit now is because it is forbidden, not because it has any value let alone would inspire anyone else to 'copy' Duke Nukem.
@ The Mighty Bison, I doubt the thread will be deleted, but if it will happen, I'm gone. I'm gone at Gearbox already.
#393 Posted 26 December 2011 - 09:43 AM
Also, it was in the livestream by and not leaked. What's the legal ground for GBX to ask to edit posts?
#394 Posted 26 December 2011 - 10:08 AM
Helel, on 26 December 2011 - 09:43 AM, said:
None.
What I assume they're doing is privately threatening to cut off contact with duke4.net and any possibility of exclusive content. However, this is a fansite and only owes its existence to the fans and love of Duke Nukem, NOT whatever company is holding the intellectual property rights at the time.
This post has been edited by Mad Max RW: 26 December 2011 - 10:09 AM
#395 Posted 26 December 2011 - 10:51 AM
It's not the first time content is censored at the request of Gearbox, Fresch or whoelse. Last time they deleted a post of TX just because he criticized the quality of Reloaded.
#396 Posted 26 December 2011 - 11:14 AM
Mad Max RW, on 26 December 2011 - 06:40 AM, said:
Can anyone actually see something in this video?
-edited-
Helel, on 26 December 2011 - 09:43 AM, said:
Same.
This post has been edited by LkMax: 26 December 2011 - 11:19 AM
#397 Posted 26 December 2011 - 11:23 AM
#398 Posted 26 December 2011 - 12:57 PM
Fox, on 26 December 2011 - 10:51 AM, said:
Yes. His reply post explaining why he censored Lunick's download links mysteriously vanished. Hint: it was a moderator and not one of the admins.
#399 Posted 26 December 2011 - 01:07 PM
This post has been edited by angelo86: 26 December 2011 - 01:16 PM
#400 Posted 26 December 2011 - 01:36 PM
#401 Posted 26 December 2011 - 02:39 PM
angelo86, on 26 December 2011 - 01:07 PM, said:
I discovered those a while back, but didn't give the link.
#402 Posted 26 December 2011 - 03:47 PM
Captain Awesome, on 26 December 2011 - 01:36 PM, said:
I think unless the website is engaged in illegal activity itself, Gearbox can only apply those measures against Interceptor.
I did not watch the video, so I still do not know its content and actually don't give a shit about it. But, correct me if I'm wrong, was it not fresch himself that proudly proclaimed that we know nothing about the deal between Gearbox and Interceptor? How is anyone supposed to know that a given video is illegal to link to? If Gearbox can't control fresch and consequently Interceptor, and I am assuming that video was issued through them, then don't come here and ask the admin to play police on good faith. (Because, no one knows anything.)
This post has been edited by Hank: 26 December 2011 - 03:49 PM
#403 Posted 26 December 2011 - 04:06 PM
NUKEMDAVE, on 26 December 2011 - 02:39 PM, said:
Ok.
http://www.ustream.t...-nukem-reloaded [OFFLINE]
This post has been edited by angelo86: 26 December 2011 - 04:34 PM
#404 Posted 26 December 2011 - 04:42 PM
Hank, on 26 December 2011 - 03:47 PM, said:
I did not watch the video, so I still do not know its content and actually don't give a shit about it. But, correct me if I'm wrong, was it not fresch himself that proudly proclaimed that we know nothing about the deal between Gearbox and Interceptor? How is anyone supposed to know that a given video is illegal to link to? If Gearbox can't control fresch and consequently Interceptor, and I am assuming that video was issued through them, then don't come here and ask the admin to play police on good faith. (Because, no one knows anything.)
Yeah, but in this case, monetarily, it's just not worth going to court over it.
#405 Posted 26 December 2011 - 04:55 PM
This post has been edited by angelo86: 26 December 2011 - 05:16 PM
#407 Posted 26 December 2011 - 05:48 PM
Captain Awesome, on 26 December 2011 - 04:42 PM, said:
Nobody will be brought to court. The worst that can happen is Gearbox bans people for linking duke4.net on their forums. If this site was part of a larger network that provided free hosting (such as Gamespy) then they'd contact IGN and have the staff removed. Fortunately that's not the case here so the only other thing they can do is permanently break off contact with Yatta, but information always has a way of getting out. I've seen these exact same tactics used on other communities and the fans always come out on top.
#408 Posted 26 December 2011 - 06:00 PM
Mad Max RW, on 26 December 2011 - 05:48 PM, said:
Modern day devs and pubs don't have the vaguest idea of what PR is. It's sad. Save for a few developers like Valve, not that many have respect for their communities. Oh, and Sega. Mad props to Sega for NEVER interfering with anyone trying to make a Sonic fan game. They knew the true fans would never buy their crap.
This post has been edited by Descent: 26 December 2011 - 06:00 PM
#409 Posted 26 December 2011 - 06:24 PM
Descent, on 26 December 2011 - 06:00 PM, said:
Sega kinda sucks ass in how they currently own and rape the Aliens/Predator/AvP game license. They proudly continue the tradition of "foxing" AvP/Aliens fan games. AvP3 was given less than a year of dev time then they promptly dropped support on all platforms. For that I am extremely wary of future games under their arm.
You have to go to the indie devs to find any sort of community respect. People like Keen Software House (Miner Wars) and Flying Wild Hog (Hard Reset) are very open to fans and include them with the design process. If you have a technical problem actual developers, not clueless talking heads hired to give out bogus info, will help you out.
This post has been edited by Mad Max RW: 26 December 2011 - 06:25 PM
#410 Posted 26 December 2011 - 07:07 PM
I can't wait for my Christmas checks to clear. Thanks for reminding me I have another two days before I can buy Hard Reset. Damn car keeps bankrupting me.
This post has been edited by Descent: 26 December 2011 - 07:09 PM
#411 Posted 26 December 2011 - 07:25 PM
The term expanded to cover any mods shut down by the property owners such as Halo and Warhammer. In more recent years "foxed" has been used to describe canceled tv shows like Firefly.
Here's an old blog post that does a really good job explaining: http://func-auton.net/blog/?p=41
#412 Posted 26 December 2011 - 09:23 PM
Mad Max RW, on 26 December 2011 - 07:25 PM, said:
'tis booked marked. Sad, but ...
#413 Posted 27 December 2011 - 03:04 PM
Mad Max RW, on 26 December 2011 - 05:48 PM, said:
Of course, but they'll probably still threaten it. At the end of the day, I doubt Yatta really gives enough of a shit to risk his ass or his website over something as shitty as this.