The Real Slim Flibble, on 29 April 2014 - 06:21 AM, said:
That is a reasonably good policy, in a general sense. Education majors have to student teach for so many semesters in order to graduate, nursing majors have to do field work to graduate (so many hours of clinicals, I think). It is generally a good idea that students get actual experience in the field they are studying, not just book experience. The book will only take you so far.
However, as you noted, the economy is shit...so...that sucks.
In your defense, engineering is something people can "do" on their own. However, if you ever want to make money, you need to know how to operate within a corporate structure (that is, not do anything the right way or at all, as the case may be).
But good luck with all of that.
I totally agree that it's a good idea for engineers to get a proper taste of how engineering companies work and what they do before graduation, it's just that the policy was created during a set of conditions which are no longer met. (Like I said, it's not just the economy, but the number of students has also increased dramatically, which is ironic because in high school everyone was encouraged to do engineering because they're "desperately in demand all over the world").
If I do get it, it wouldn't be bad at all, because you actually get decent money for it (unless you're desperate enough to volunteer for free). However due to numbers the whole thing just isn't practical. Luckily unlike most people I'm studying an extra year, which gives me a 2nd chance next year if I don't get it, and I'll also be more desirable because I'll basically
be an engineer by that point anyway and can do some proper work for the company.