
The Post Thread
#11191 Posted 07 December 2013 - 03:29 PM
end result is the same either way unless someone recognizes the problem and gets them help before they snap
This post has been edited by Forge: 07 December 2013 - 03:30 PM
#11192 Posted 07 December 2013 - 03:31 PM
#11193 Posted 07 December 2013 - 03:52 PM
Jimmy, on 07 December 2013 - 03:31 PM, said:
I try to have a variety of interests. I play games, fly with simulators (FSX and Prepar3D 2.0), play golf in the summer. Not much for winter activities. I do watch movies and such. Don't have much variety in games. Looked at the upcoming releases in 2014, and nothing sounds too interesting to me. Unless the next Mass Effect game comes out that year. No firm release date yet. I was messing around with Max Payne 3 over the last week.
I suppose I do need to learn to mix with people with similar interests because there's no reason to talk to someone who's almost a polar opposite of you (eg. I like [X] game; he hates [X] game).
#11194 Posted 07 December 2013 - 04:13 PM
Jimmy, on 07 December 2013 - 03:27 PM, said:
And these are the only two sociopaths on the planet?
#11195 Posted 07 December 2013 - 04:36 PM
causes:
http://www.mayoclini...DSECTION=causes
you can look up any reputable link you like; most agree it's a combination of genetics and environment
#11196 Posted 07 December 2013 - 04:51 PM
Forge, on 07 December 2013 - 04:36 PM, said:
And what's not? That's the same as not saying anything.
#11197 Posted 07 December 2013 - 04:57 PM
Forge, on 07 December 2013 - 04:36 PM, said:
causes:
http://www.mayoclini...DSECTION=causes
you can look up any reputable link you like; most agree it's a combination of genetics and environment
I definitely don't fit into that category. More into this one. Not really an uncaring person, which would make me a sociopath, I am not. Definitely not selfish, as I have helped others with things. Fixed someone's computer for them a month back. I wanted to do this, because I wanted to help them fix a problem.
This post has been edited by Jeff: 07 December 2013 - 05:00 PM
#11198 Posted 07 December 2013 - 05:58 PM
This post has been edited by EMPATHY_IS_AN_ELEPHANT: 19 August 2015 - 09:35 PM
#11199 Posted 07 December 2013 - 06:45 PM
This post has been edited by Lunick: 07 December 2013 - 06:45 PM
#11200 Posted 07 December 2013 - 07:30 PM
Fox, on 07 December 2013 - 04:51 PM, said:
no.
it's saying that certain people are born with a propensity to be a sociopath, but a decent upbringing with a structured environment will, in most cases, preclude the chance of destructive behavior
-there's no guarantee that the person still won't become a sociopath
it also says that a person without an innate inclination to be a sociopath, can, through abuse, neglect, trauma - physical&psychological, acquire the traits to become a sociopath
-there's no guarantee that this person will become a sociopath
there's no set of rules as to why certain people get personality disorders of this nature, but certain combinations are more likely to produce particular results
so the argument about sociopaths being born that way? the answer is yes and no. they can be born broken, or they can be made to be broken from their environment
examples: Richard Ramirez (NightStalker) - normal kid until head injuries and influence by a cousin who exposed him to images of rape and combat kills from Vietnam. Watched his cousin's wife get murdered - by his cousin. etc. - made the way he became by his environment
Dennis Rader (BTK) -normal childhood, normal family - started torturing and killing animals for no reason and acquired a fetish for wearing women's underwear. still managed to get a college degree, serve in the military, become a prominent member of his church, hold down a normal job - then just snapped - born that way
This post has been edited by Forge: 07 December 2013 - 08:13 PM
#11201 Posted 07 December 2013 - 07:32 PM
Radar, on 07 December 2013 - 05:58 PM, said:
yeah, yeah...

#11203 Posted 07 December 2013 - 08:58 PM
Forge, on 07 December 2013 - 04:36 PM, said:
Btw, what about being gay? This whole "it's not a choice, I was born that way" get hammered pretty loudly, but shouldn't environment also matter in some ways?
Radar, on 07 December 2013 - 05:58 PM, said:
I don't know. I was pretty pissed off several months earlier to the point of just getting away from these forums. Because sometimes it becomes too frustrating when posters rather insult or 'joke' over and over than argue on a topic at hand. Especially when the topic is quite important to you.
#11204 Posted 07 December 2013 - 09:11 PM
People who are "flamboyant" are not necessarily homosexual. People who are emotionally repressed (that isn't the right word) are not necessarily sociopaths.
I have certainly gone through what some might consider sociopathic phases (I may still be in one at 26). But that isn't really from genetics. It is probably from girls being evil. Certain genetic attributes influenced and probably augmented the emotional repression from life experiences.
Most things are a combination of genetic attributes and hormonal levels and life experiences.
#11205 Posted 07 December 2013 - 09:42 PM
Kathy, on 07 December 2013 - 08:58 PM, said:
hypotheses point to hormonal exposure while in the womb too much/little androgen or testosterone
link:
http://healthland.ti...-homosexuality/
there are quite a few more, but one should suffice
most studies indicate that social environment is not as large a contributing factor as prenatal environment-
fraternal twin studies are skewed because twins receive blood and hormones from separate placentas
identical twin studies are skewed, while sharing a hormonal environment it's been found that one twin usually gets the majority of the "input" and transfuses it to the other twin (thus the fluids have been "filtered")
there's no such thing as a "gay" gene
sexual preference is not a "fixed" propensity
that's why people can change orientation during their lifetimes or go through what they call, "their experimental stage"
but trying to force yourself to change probably wouldn't be good for your mental health because you'll be fighting your normal natural urges
if you're thinking about it, just let your gate swing both ways so you can get the best of both worlds
This post has been edited by Forge: 07 December 2013 - 09:45 PM
#11206 Posted 07 December 2013 - 10:14 PM

This isn't as painful as it looks. I don't really feel anything from it. Looks painful though.
I can see around 20/20 in both eyes. Although they can check it on Monday, and possibly tweak for better results.
This post has been edited by Jeff: 07 December 2013 - 10:16 PM
#11207 Posted 07 December 2013 - 10:21 PM
Quote
I'd be happy if my gate swing at least somewhere. So... how about that soap?
This post has been edited by Kathy: 07 December 2013 - 10:22 PM
#11208 Posted 07 December 2013 - 10:47 PM
Radar, on 07 December 2013 - 05:58 PM, said:
Because you're awesome. You are one of the funniest posters hete.
#11209 Posted 07 December 2013 - 10:51 PM
Sounds like this;
------
@Jeff; Your photo reminds me of minority report, don't take the bandages off for 24 hours or you'll go blind, next thing we know you'll be eating the mouldy sandwich and drinking sour milk from the refridgerator. Nah, glad to know it seems to have gone well.
#11210 Posted 07 December 2013 - 11:13 PM
High Treason, on 07 December 2013 - 10:51 PM, said:
I think it also depends on the surgeon's skill level as well. However, like I said, the lady that did mine has been doing this for 25 years. So there's like a 0.0000001 chance that something could go wrong. I did kind of flinch when they were applying the first laser (makes a loud snapping noise, startled me), but that was just to take off the tissue from the eye (it's a cool laser, not hot). Thankfully my cold did cover up some of the burning flesh smell. The second laser actually corrects the vision. I didn't flinch there. Looked like a green and red light show.
Forgot one thing.
Don't scratch! Never scratch!
Dr. Solomon: I'll have to remove your eyes completely and replace them with new ones.
John Anderton: I'd like to keep the old ones
Dr. Solomon: Why?
John Anderton: Because my mother gave them to me.
My eye color is actually similar to my mom's (90% green, with a hint of hazel in the center). I think my dad has blue eyes. Last I checked.
I haven't seen that movie in a while. I should watch it tomorrow.
This post has been edited by Jeff: 07 December 2013 - 11:17 PM
#11211 Posted 08 December 2013 - 01:02 AM
Radar, on 07 December 2013 - 11:23 AM, said:
This is the moderator toolbar:

Radar, on 07 December 2013 - 11:23 AM, said:
Those were all me. It's more that the other mods are either busy or don't care about degeneracy outside the EDuke32 subforums, and that I
#11213 Posted 08 December 2013 - 01:19 AM
#11214 Posted 08 December 2013 - 02:08 AM
#11215 Posted 08 December 2013 - 04:36 AM
#11216 Posted 08 December 2013 - 04:47 AM
Forge, on 07 December 2013 - 07:30 PM, said:
Yes. A person propensity to kill, have sex, play videogames or eat chocolate, everything is biology + environment.
Kathy, on 07 December 2013 - 08:58 PM, said:
That's crap, but given the context of being used against the religious fundamentalists, it's a valid argument.
===//===//===


This post has been edited by Fox: 08 December 2013 - 05:12 AM
#11217 Posted 08 December 2013 - 07:28 AM
Fox, on 08 December 2013 - 04:47 AM, said:
That's crap. Religious people aren't the only ones who prosecute individuals for their sexual orientation
Fox, on 08 December 2013 - 04:47 AM, said:
no. And i gave an example of a serial killer born with pathological mental issues, but grew up and lived in a perfectly "normal" environment. Internal wiring problems finally overrode his attempt to live peacefully.
This post has been edited by Forge: 08 December 2013 - 07:41 AM
#11218 Posted 08 December 2013 - 08:06 AM
This post has been edited by Mark.: 08 December 2013 - 08:08 AM
#11219 Posted 08 December 2013 - 08:33 AM
It can be seen here. http://www.channel4....d-the-world/4od
Or if that has regional restrictions it can be found on Youtube or the other usual places.
Charlie Brooker has been trying to explain to older people and non gaming types that games are more than mere kids toys for a while now, unfortunately he is usually unsuccessful and has discribed how watching someone who is completely ignorant about video games trying to play is like watching a dog trying to fly a helicopter.
Look at this as a perfect example of a closed minded old fool doing his best to not try to understand gaming.
This post has been edited by Ronan: 08 December 2013 - 08:35 AM
#11220 Posted 08 December 2013 - 08:52 AM
Mark., on 08 December 2013 - 08:06 AM, said:
Well there you have it. Brain development, chemical/hormonal exposure, and any other prenatal environmental influences have very little to do with anything a person may do during their lifetime other than giving a person the propensity to be more prone to external influences. Babies don't go on chainsaw rampages in the maternity ward.