
The Post Thread
#6241 Posted 21 May 2012 - 06:40 PM
#6242 Posted 21 May 2012 - 07:12 PM

At least the screen came out of it unscathed. The monitor ended up being a bit bigger than I was expecting because I guess the number of pixels per inch is a bit less than the screen it replaced, but it's not so far off as to be jarring or anything.
#6243 Posted 21 May 2012 - 08:15 PM
Captain Awesome, on 21 May 2012 - 06:40 PM, said:
More like hard rock.
#6244 Posted 24 May 2012 - 12:36 AM
In any event I asked them about the position I did apply for (reset merchandiser) and that I was opting more towards that, and they said that there may be more openings, but they weren't sure and would have to check. We talked about it a bit more, and I gave them my (quite sound) reasoning on why I wanted to shoot for that first. Overall it went well and seems pretty promising, though I wish some more progress could've been made.
#6245 Posted 24 May 2012 - 07:52 AM
Yet, all of them make more than I do.
#6246 Posted 24 May 2012 - 09:13 AM
I kind of wonder why there aren't more part time jobs in different fields. Perhaps working part time would make people happier. Whenever I search job boards and such, 95% of those jobs are full time.
#6247 Posted 24 May 2012 - 09:19 AM
#6248 Posted 24 May 2012 - 09:43 AM
Jeff, on 24 May 2012 - 09:13 AM, said:
Full-time is the new part-time. I hear more and more about people who work 75-hour workweeks. I work 40 hours a week in administration and even I am planning to get a second job.
#6249 Posted 24 May 2012 - 09:57 AM
Jeff, on 24 May 2012 - 09:13 AM, said:
Yeah like it's being mentioned, for a lot of people, not even one full-time job is enough to sustain yourself these days. Either way, I'll never willingly step foot into the part-time vacuum again. I've worked for the same suck-ass company for five years, and for the first two I was a part-timer (even though when I applied I specified full-time; they made me part-time anyway). Absolutely awful experience. They'll cut you off at 37-39 hours a week so you're just under the wire. This way they don't have to give you any benefits, and if hours need to be cut, you're the first person they go for.
I'm really hoping I can get this reset job, but even if the commission gig is all that's left, I'm seriously considering it. Nothing would make me happier than to turn in my two weeks notice, because if/when that happens, I know my boss is going to sit me down and try to talk me out of it and at that point I can tell him exactly why I'm leaving. With the way things have been going for me here lately, I'll take my happiness wherever I can get it.
#6250 Posted 24 May 2012 - 09:58 AM
Achenar, on 24 May 2012 - 09:43 AM, said:
Because having free time is not for you?
75 hours per week means going home from work just to sleep or working every day. Sounds like fun.
This post has been edited by Burnett: 24 May 2012 - 10:02 AM
#6251 Posted 24 May 2012 - 02:17 PM
Burnett, on 21 May 2012 - 08:15 PM, said:
I don't think so. Are you sure you've ever listened to Danzig?
#6252 Posted 24 May 2012 - 05:26 PM
When I tell people things like "Never touch ANY of the plug sockets in my house as you may start a fire or disrupt my network." I expect them to listen, but no, nobody ever does, that rule obviously went ignored, the iron must have been plugged in for over 8 hours, several of which the house was empty for with the iron sat on a wooden board out of it's stand, surrounded by paper, fag ends and even a can of lighter fluid.
Rant mode on:
I'm seriously going to have to put my foot down with my friends, they're all peeved at the moment because I succeeded in getting exemption from paying a TV License - I don't like or watch TV, I'd rather chuck a few quid away on a movie I might not like as chances are I'll get bored and watch it again anyway as well as only having to pay for the DVD/download once, not every year. Funny though, they won't pay for the license themselves. Incidentally, I worked out that I only use around 33% of electricity and water here, but I pay all the bills, all the rent and all the tax in full.
I also forbid the abuse of my network, basic rules are; No wireless devices to be attached to the network, no torrents and no excessive video streaming as I can not afford the bandwidth. The Wireless rule has never been broken as far as I can tell and you'd have to go out of your way to do anything with that, but the video streaming... check this out;

I also discovered yesterday that every time a certain guy uses my network he's been seeding torrents. I'd been bugging him about constant network activity for a few weeks. I recently got a 16 Port Hub for £5 so I'll be WireSharking people from now on via the second ethernet jack on this computer - I have my original 5 Port hub from when I first went to Ethernet as opposed to BNC, but I think people might notice 10Mbit/s Half-Duplex. My router is a bit ass, but I may be able to implement some measures against this stuff with my Switch - damn, I love having a managed switch with fibre onboard (D-Link DES-1526), never looked back.
Ugh, well, I'm tired, so I'm going to go to sleep.
Edit: Oh, now, talking of switches, nobody happens to know where I might be able to get the old management software for the D-Link DES-1024F do they? I recently accuired one and it uses a parallel port for management, D-Link do not appear to list the variant I own on any site and the DES-1024 they DO list is one that doesn't have management. I guess I could write to support.
This post has been edited by High Treason: 24 May 2012 - 05:29 PM
#6253 Posted 24 May 2012 - 08:20 PM
Captain Awesome, on 24 May 2012 - 02:17 PM, said:
Yes, I'm sure. And it never sounded that heavy to be metal. At least first 3-4 albums.
#6255 Posted 24 May 2012 - 10:26 PM
But it ain't black, death, doom/death or thrash, that's for sure. Not that there aren't other metal genres.
#6256 Posted 24 May 2012 - 11:12 PM
This post has been edited by Engel220: 24 May 2012 - 11:14 PM
#6257 Posted 24 May 2012 - 11:58 PM
Engel220, on 24 May 2012 - 11:12 PM, said:
Well, you can't base musical genre on subject matter. It may influence it one way or another, but that's it. I even saw someone called Danzig black metal which was ridiculous.
Quote
Most likely.
#6258 Posted 25 May 2012 - 04:51 AM
High Treason, on 24 May 2012 - 05:26 PM, said:
Very easy to do here. You just inform the powers that be that you're no longer in possession of anything that could be used to watch television. They have inspectors going from house to house every now and then to check whether the people who're not paying the license really have no tv but they have no legal authority to enter your home so you can just choose not to let the inspectors in (let alone answer the door, which no one in an apartment building does anyway).
#6259 Posted 25 May 2012 - 09:54 AM
Achenar, on 24 May 2012 - 09:43 AM, said:
For me, there's a lot more to life than making lots of money. Unfortunately, some people work to live, while others live to work. I just see work as giving myself something to do during the week to keep busy while making a few extra bucks for the stuff I want.
Most people work because they have to afford things to live off of. Food, clothing, shelther, and of course, new computers and toys! I've asked around, and some people said if there wasn't any money involved, they wouldn't work.
#6260 Posted 25 May 2012 - 12:25 PM
Jeff, on 25 May 2012 - 09:54 AM, said:
Well, of course, involuntary work without monetary compensation is slavery. But I don't believe people should expect to be given money to live if they aren't willing to work.
I realize that my opinion is contrary to those of some members of this message board and the Occupy movement, but it's the opinion I've held for as long as I remember.
This post has been edited by Achenar: 25 May 2012 - 12:26 PM
#6261 Posted 25 May 2012 - 02:45 PM
Burnett, on 24 May 2012 - 10:26 PM, said:
But it ain't black, death, doom/death or thrash, that's for sure. Not that there aren't other metal genres.
It's all heavy metal, and some of it after the first few albums he experimented with industrial metal quite a bit.
#6262 Posted 25 May 2012 - 05:21 PM
Achenar, on 25 May 2012 - 12:25 PM, said:
I realize that my opinion is contrary to those of some members of this message board and the Occupy movement, but it's the opinion I've held for as long as I remember.
I guess when I asked this person the question, I said, if the world wasn't based off of money (capitalism), would they still work. They said no. I think Star Trek is resource based (moneyless).
#6263 Posted 25 May 2012 - 05:45 PM
Captain Awesome, on 25 May 2012 - 02:45 PM, said:
I will not argue with Burnett directly, but I think he is thinking of Blues Rock elements used by Danzig. And actually, I am listening to them right now, sounds like metal too me.

This post has been edited by Hank: 25 May 2012 - 05:46 PM
#6264 Posted 25 May 2012 - 07:55 PM
#6265 Posted 26 May 2012 - 12:21 AM
Hank, on 25 May 2012 - 05:45 PM, said:

Nah. It's just that while listening lots of metal Danzig just never sounded to me as metal compared to other bands. Elemets are there sure, but I never thought about them to the point of calling it metal.
What's a hard rock then, Guns N' Roses?
Captain Awesome, on 25 May 2012 - 07:55 PM, said:
I don't think anyone 'should' do anything.
#6267 Posted 26 May 2012 - 09:20 AM
Burnett, on 26 May 2012 - 12:21 AM, said:
What's a hard rock then, Guns N' Roses?
As I wrote before, I don't want an in depth argument either, but you made a good point here. - I think metal is a loose derivative of Hard Rock, but with an edge. Most good bands use a variety of music genres and I judge them by their songs I listened too, and so did you. Thus you are right, from your perspective.
Guns N Roses - His voice has the chalk on the blackboard affect to my ears. So I looked it up a bit, apparently they fit into Hard Rock and Metal? Yet, we have two major Rock Stations. One caters to Hard Rock and one to Metal. You will never ever hear Guns N Roses on my station (Metal, Alternative), unless for concert promosions, ergo I say they are Hard Rock, mostly.
This post has been edited by Hank: 26 May 2012 - 11:56 AM
#6268 Posted 26 May 2012 - 10:53 AM

Next time I make it I might use glazed pecans instead, and I might also let it sit for longer before serving it. I let it sit for about an hour and a half last night and it was delicious, but the leftovers today for lunch were even better. Must be something with the juices from the different ingredients mixing together and soaking into everything.
#6269 Posted 26 May 2012 - 11:06 AM
The "leftover" effect is common, I think the example I commonly think of it with is chili. Mmm, chili.