The Post Thread
#17884 Posted 17 September 2015 - 09:52 AM
Jeff, on 13 September 2015 - 12:02 PM, said:
Just think if that much power had to be generated by wind turbines. According to figures I have seen, your average 200-300 foot high turbine is rated for 2megawatts of output under ideal conditions. But when you factor in the days when there is little to no wind or when it is too windy and the brakes must be engaged, their effeciency drops to roughly 30 percent. So figure 3 turbines for every 2 MW produced. That means 645 turbines needed for the same output as this plant in Canada. How many square miles of landscape wold be needed for this huge wind farm? And who would want that eyesore in or near their city or county? Plus you would still have to keep the existing plant intact and running year round as a backup during down time for the turbines. How can the global warming nutjobs think this is the answer to save the planet?
This post has been edited by Mark.: 17 September 2015 - 09:55 AM
#17885 Posted 17 September 2015 - 01:51 PM
But we have to do all this in two years or we're doomed, according to Al Gore.
#17886 Posted 17 September 2015 - 03:50 PM
This post has been edited by Mark.: 17 September 2015 - 03:53 PM
#17887 Posted 17 September 2015 - 04:25 PM
Oh shit wait it all happened and is still getting worse!
Right now the US, Russia, and Canada are scrambling to claim as much territory as they can up north in case there's lots of oil deposits. Mmm sweet petrol. Also some nice new trade routes are opening up.
#17888 Posted 17 September 2015 - 05:34 PM
Mblackwell, on 17 September 2015 - 04:25 PM, said:
You're right. None of those things ever happened before man indusrialized. Silly me.
But seriously, how can you believe the drivel after Climate gate exposed the climate scientists for the liars and frauds they were. Or U.N. officials admitting the real reasons for promoting the scam and that it has nothing to do with science. Its about social justice.
Do a Google search similar to " failed global warming predictions " and read a handful of sites. Some are better than others with longer lists. Al Gore does nothing to help their cause either.
This post has been edited by Mark.: 17 September 2015 - 05:43 PM
#17889 Posted 17 September 2015 - 05:39 PM
#17890 Posted 18 September 2015 - 05:34 AM
Mblackwell, on 17 September 2015 - 04:25 PM, said:
If you go by scientific accuracy... but the public gets the idea of a movie-like instant catastrophe from the media and politicians.
#17891 Posted 18 September 2015 - 07:26 AM
> What false facts are thought as real ones because of film industry?
> I live in Kazakhstan and I don't even want to start
#17892 Posted 18 September 2015 - 10:51 AM
Fox, on 18 September 2015 - 05:34 AM, said:
As we all know, the mass market media is the best way to communicate scientific ideas. After all, when the Ebola scare happened, Rise of the Planet of the Apes was the foremost source of medical knowledge, because it let us know that we could all die of a crippling epidemic (even though the virus was proven to be not airborne... but details, details!!!). Not to mention Donald Trump being anti-vaccine, and he's a businessman, so you know he's rich because he's smart, so he's probably right.
Come on. Everyone knows the best source of information for everything is the movies. The movies teach us we can fire two guns at once and be more powerful and more accurate than someone with one gun; that we can make people of the opposite sex fall in love with us within an hour and thirty minutes even if they have every reason to hate us at first; or that stereotypes and archetypes on the whole tend to be 99% true - except when they're subverted at mostly predictable moments.
Doesn't it just make you want to Wilhelm scream?
This post has been edited by Spastic Lagomorph: 18 September 2015 - 10:52 AM
#17893 Posted 18 September 2015 - 05:02 PM
Office fan:
Bedroom fan:
This post has been edited by Jeff: 18 September 2015 - 05:10 PM
#17895 Posted 18 September 2015 - 10:09 PM
I like Jeff already he is cool. Also, this sort of picture could be used as motivation for a map
Jeff, on 13 September 2015 - 12:02 PM, said:
This post has been edited by 64Ghost: 19 September 2015 - 07:26 AM
#17896 Posted 19 September 2015 - 11:45 PM
Spastic Lagomorph, on 18 September 2015 - 10:51 AM, said:
Winning.
#17897 Posted 20 September 2015 - 12:40 AM
#17898 Posted 20 September 2015 - 01:01 AM
#17902 Posted 21 September 2015 - 10:43 PM
This post has been edited by Daedolon: 23 September 2015 - 11:08 AM
#17903 Posted 22 September 2015 - 10:36 AM
This post has been edited by Mark.: 22 September 2015 - 10:38 AM
#17905 Posted 22 September 2015 - 07:14 PM
This post has been edited by Mark.: 22 September 2015 - 07:20 PM
#17906 Posted 23 September 2015 - 01:32 AM
I found a laptop with Windows 98 on it today.
http://www.cnet.com/...b-ram-3-gb-hdd/
This post has been edited by Lunick: 23 September 2015 - 01:32 AM
#17908 Posted 23 September 2015 - 05:17 AM
Lunick, on 23 September 2015 - 01:32 AM, said:
"I'm not one to play with trash but... I found a Laptop with Windows 98 on it today"
That's strangely what everyone is saying about windows 8 and 10 PC's.
#17909 Posted 23 September 2015 - 05:24 AM
http://arstechnica.c...right-is-bogus/
#17910 Posted 23 September 2015 - 05:28 AM
ReaperMan, on 23 September 2015 - 05:17 AM, said:
That's strangely what everyone is saying about windows 8 and 10 PC's.
I was referring to taking rubbish off the side of the road, not the laptop itself