gemeaux333, on 26 October 2019 - 09:44 AM, said:
You are wrong I am affraid : NINTENDO does
Are you referring to Mario or something? I don't really think average people outside of their fans care about Nintendo platformers, Nintendo fanbase is pretty different from fanbases of other consoles and they prefer different kind of games (because most of the Nintendo games are unique on their own). Switch is not considered as true competition of Sony or MS either these days, the biggest reason of course is because it's handheld console. Switch is kinda like Vita, but instead of just small games or indies it also has ton of AA games too.
Anyway, I was waiting for this response and thought I'd see it posted sooner, so I could speak about the topic more. If you think about it, pretty much all of their handheld consoles had platformers due to rather not so powerful hardware, that is compared to the rest of the consoles of course. And ironically some of those consoles were a good excuse for some big (mostly Japanese companies of course) to make platformers too. If it wasn't for Nintendo, Castlevania, for example, would be dead as a series earlier because transition to 3D failed.
But these days no one among AAA companies really gives a shit about platformers anymore, AAA companies prefer to invest heavy budget into blockbaster garbage and nothing else, they want to make open world games or shooters infested with microtransactions because that's what big masses prefer to play on their powerful PC or console hardware, while platformers are seen as some indie shit and niche games at best. Your average PS4 player plays shit like CoD, sports games, open world shit or games with simplified character customization that dares to call itself RPG, not platformers, strategies, JRPGs or CRPGs or some other obscure genres. Well, platformers were treated like this since 2000s, but now they just don't care anymore, maybe because less people buy them, I don't know.
But then, there is likely a problem related to prices too, it's pretty difficult to charge 60 bucks for this kind of games or milk our wallet with microtransactions on top of that, hell, even on Steam forums people complain about some "low budget" games being overpriced just because those games have "bad graphics" alone, even if said games have ton of content in it. Just look at
this game, for example, and tell me, would you personally spend 60 bucks for it? It has regional pricing issue, but if we ignore it and pretend it cost $60 or equivalent to your regional price, would you? As an average player who is not huge fan of JRPG. I personally think you would skip it at best for such price. This game is really niche as fuck.
Actually, the last platformer made by AAA studio I can really think of (in-house) was Rayman Legends and the studio that made it was actually killed by Ubisoft afterwards (the engine now is pretty much dead despite the fact that it had potential), I'm absolutely sure that Ubisoft like the rest of the companies wanted bigger money and more sales so they just axed those guys to save money and focus on shit that really matters in their opinion: typical big budget AAA trash.
So, no one really makes platformers aside from indies and AA studios these days, especially not the likes of Gearbox, 2K, Take-Two, EA, Ubisoft, Capcom, Bandai Namco, Sony, Blizzard, Konami, you name it, and if Nintendo decided to compete with Sony with MS they would drop platformers too and focus on shit that's popular: sports games, open world games, shooters, pseudo-RPGs, and then they would charge you over 60 bucks for that shit.