Duke4.net Forums: Bio Menace corner - Duke4.net Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Bio Menace corner

User is offline   NY00123 

#31

A new video has been uploaded, with Niko and Bart answering questions about BioMenace Remastered. At least a subset of the questions had possibly been answered elsewhere, but this video should be up right now.

Title: "BioMenace Remastered - Questions & Answers Episode 1"


1

User is offline   NY00123 

#32

Let me simply quote Niko here:

lethal-guitar said:

We're releasing a free demo for BioMenace Remastered on Steam this Friday, 11 July! This way you can already get a feel for what our version will be like, while we continue working on episode 4 and other aspects of the full game.
We'll be posting a series of teasers on our YouTube channel until then. Here's the first one:


1

User is offline   NY00123 

#33

The BioMenace Remastered Demo has been released!

https://store.steamp...ace_Remastered/



Bart's last recorded live stream:


1

#34

Guy in the left of that Q&A thumbnail looks the type to hang around the kids' pool.

Not at all interested in the remaster, seeing as the original game is a broken piece of trash so I can't find any will to play a worse looking version of it. It looks like they took the tiles in PhotoImpact, pressed "select near color" and used the built-in "special texture" presets on each. Also not even remotely surprised by the cookie cutter music that was posted a while back. All in all it's set to be yet another thing that will come and go without anyone caring beyond YouTubers that probably got a free copy and whatever percentage of their audience will buy it, but probably never play more than five minutes of it. With how low effort it looks, I'm sure the people behind it will pocket a few quid anyway.

Never shared it on the board, but I did a cover of "Sludge" a good while back using gear from the 70s and 80s: (40:05).
You can ignore the rest of the video as I ultimately quite the game after it ran afoul of my 'no softlocks' rule. It sucks because Snake Logan had a lot of potential as a character and I'm sure in some alternate reality he got popular instead of Duke Nukem, or else they both did and now have some weird crossover game.
As for the music, I have a version of that sequence adapted for Duke 3D's sound library, for reasons. Some odd decisions had to be made in it like whether to have a full tom roll, or whether to leave the gaps in like the original has due to the poly limit of the AdLib. Most of the cover is running on PD synths which were the cheaper competitor to the FM technology the AdLib used, though the bassline is just plain old analog subtractive stuff.

This post has been edited by High Treason: 15 July 2025 - 02:39 AM

0

User is offline   dnskill 

  • Honored Donor

#35

Not interested in the remaster, but interested in whining about skill issues, graphics, music, insulting devs, and self promoting your own video. Imagine if you had formed your critiques into a productive response that could help the dev team improve the product instead of using the thread as an opportunity to rant. C'mon HT, you're better than that.

This post has been edited by dnskill: 15 July 2025 - 02:04 PM

1

#36

Ah, I see, another case of the good old patented "it's perfectly fine... unless DXZeff does it" double standard. How boring.

I can't really say anything more as you didn't refute any of my assertions, although it's quite clear you weren't paying attention to them in the first place, given more than one of your statements is objectively wrong.
-1

#37

View PostHigh Treason, on 15 July 2025 - 04:59 PM, said:

Ah, I see, another case of the good old patented "it's perfectly fine... unless DXZeff does it" double standard. How boring.

I can't really say anything more as you didn't refute any of my assertions, although it's quite clear you weren't paying attention to them in the first place, given more than one of your statements is objectively wrong.


Okay, I'll help dnskill out by refuting your assertions.

Quote

Guy in the left of that Q&A thumbnail looks the type to hang around the kids' pool.

Wrong and uncalled for.

Quote

seeing as the original game is a broken piece of trash

Wrong.

Quote

It looks like they took the tiles in PhotoImpact, pressed "select near color" and used the built-in "special texture" presets on each.

Wrong.

Quote

cookie cutter music

Wrong.

Quote

All in all it's set to be yet another thing that will come and go without anyone caring beyond YouTubers that probably got a free copy and whatever percentage of their audience will buy it, but probably never play more than five minutes of it

Wrong.

Quote

With how low effort it looks

Wrong.

Will that suffice?
1

#38

I don't think you know how this works. I made a statement and supplied evidence that it is in fact true. Ergo the burden lies with you to provide evidence to the contrary. You have done no such thing. Simply writing "wrong" is highly inadequate. I could say my expectations were higher, but it would be a lie and I'm not at all surprised, to the point I even suspect you may be acting dumb deliberately. Either that or you're on the payroll. If you have nothing to offer, then stay quiet next time, otherwise it doesn't really look good, does it.

I will concede that the person's appearance is somewhat subjective, but that look with the moustache, receding hair and weak stature fits the stereotype, visually. Believe me, he has my sympathies, although he could have taken a few minutes to fix himself up before the photo was taken. It isn't difficult.


Your post stinks of envy.

This post has been edited by High Treason: 16 July 2025 - 03:20 PM

0

#39

View PostHigh Treason, on 16 July 2025 - 03:18 PM, said:

Your post stinks of envy.


Kung pow penis
0

User is offline   NY00123 

#40

So, I've been reminded of this technical bit about the DOS games. There's another thing that might be brought up in a follow-up post, again not about the remaster itself.

The technical bit in question is a bit disappointing: There's nothing new to find in BM's unused GAMEMAPS.* files from the DOS versions. I brought this up in private with the BioMenace Remastered team before the remaster's reveal from last April - I think that's been more than enough time that I may write in public forums now.

For a bit of a background, Keen Dreams and derived games, including Keen 4-6 and BM, made use of variations of the same map format. Such maps could be created using the Tile Editor v5.0 (TED5), written by John Romero. The editor itself was working with files having not much more than RLEW compression. Such files had names like MAPTEMP.BM1. There were further map header files, but I'll skip these for now.

There was also an option to apply another level of compression. While Keen Dreams used Huffman compression, later games like Keen 4-6 made use of a different form, known as Carmack compression: https://moddingwiki....ack_compression

Applying the extra compression could be done from TED5 itself, starting with the usual MAPTEMP.EXT file and creating a new GAMEMAPS.EXT file. There are again details I'll skip, like the creation of a new map header for a GAMEMAPS.EXT file.

With the version of TED5 distributed by Apogee for ROTT map creation at the time, the menu item "Carmackize maps" should activate that. It's a process that might take a while, especially on vintage hardware.

Now, let's get back to BioMenace. Unlike Keen 4-6, BM as released in the 1990s used the MAPTEMP.* files, not GAMEMAPS.*. Additionally, there were enough files allowing not just the use of TED5, but also the creation of new levels compatible with the existing BM executables.

So, what about these unused GAMEMAPS.* files again? As said, there's nothing new to find. GAMEMAPS.BM3 and the July 1992 beta's GAMEMAPS.BH1 are identical and practically empty. GAMEMAPS.BM1 and GAMEMAPS.BM2 seemed to be partially created from the released MAPTEMP.* files, before aborting the process in the middle.

I tried carmackizing the freeware release's MAPTEMP.* (also matching older versions differing from BH1) with TED5. Outside of bytes no. 8 and 10 (starting from 0), all contents of the unused trimmed GAMEMAPS.* were identical to the new ones created by TED5 as run by me. The reason for bytes 8 and 10 differing seemed to be related to a buffer overread bug in TED5 impacting write of the string TED5v1.0. It's 9-bytes long, including the NUL terminating character, but was copied to a 8-bytes long buffer in TED5's Item_Huffman. strlen was used to calculate the string's length from that buffer. As said earlier, GAMEMAPS.BH1/GAMEMAPS.BM3 is practically empty. Only the TED5v1.0 prefix is present, extended to 11 bytes due to the aforementioned bug.

This post has been edited by NY00123: 20 July 2025 - 09:50 AM

1

Share this topic:


  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic


All copyrights and trademarks not owned by Voidpoint, LLC are the sole property of their respective owners. Play Ion Fury! ;) © Voidpoint, LLC

Enter your sign in name and password


Sign in options