Shax, on Jun 23 2009, 01:12 PM, said:
I have no doubt that Duke Begins would have come out before DNF. Why, because it was not gonna be made by 3DR! I'm sickened with people still taking 3DRs side in all this. I don't care if TT is trying to grab the IP, who can blame them? In my eyes TT is trying to salvage whats left of the IP from a developer who has allowed it to languish in oblivion for over a decade!
Are you a complete idiot?! Take-Two halted development on Duke Begins after a year and that was after having a contractual obligation with 3DR to make it (and keep them in the loop). So no, Duke Begins wouldn't have come out before DNF because it isn't being worked on. You obviously didn't read the court document and now you're just posting shit in here... go back, read the document and then start posting. Take-Two isn't as reliable as you think they are... At the very least you'd expect them to directly answer 3DR when they asked if the game was still going ahead as planned. At least we know for a fact that 3DR was still working on DNF until Take-Two caused the development to stop after promising to fund the rest of the project but ended up screwing 3DR over instead.
3DR told Take-Two it needed 6 million (which is peanuts for a game, for reference, TT spent 100 million on GTA4), Take-Two later said they are only willing to give 3DR 5 million, which 3DR agreed on. But then, with only a few days notice before Take-Two was supposed to start funding the game, they changed the funding agreement to only 2.5 million. Even an idiot can see that 3DR wouldn't sign a contract that says, "cool, we'll finish off the game by [date] with 2.5 million of funding" because it simply wasn't enough to finish the game. Take-Two didn't want to change the agreement back to 5 million and instead tried to acquire the entire Duke Nukem franchise
for free in a second contract
with no guarantees that they would finish DNF or what would become of the development team... Now, considering that they cancelled/delayed Duke Begins after a year, would you honestly agree to their ridiculous contract to acquire the entire franchise and team for free without a guarantee that DNF would be finished? If you just said yes, you are an even a bigger idiot than I thought... No one would have agreed to these terms, myself included. And if that puts me under the same category as George Broussard, then so be it.
With no funding, 3DR had no choice but to lay off the development team until it figured out how it would continue development without Take-Two's help - it never at any point in time stated that DNF was cancelled because it was their intention to complete it. Of course TT then filed a lawsuit based on false facts which it knew was not correct, such as 3DR closing its doors, cancelling DNF, having rights to the source code when clearly they did not, attempting to request repayment of a loan 3 years before it is actually due, claiming it paid 12 million for the right to publish DNF when 3DR had nothing to do with that contract with GT and never received any of that money, etc. etc. So to put it bluntly, it is Take-Two's fault it wasn't completed and even if Take-Two intended to finish DNF, after hearing what happened to Duke Begins, I seriously doubt they would finish DNF anyway. Scott and George probably drew the same conclusion and even if they didn't, if I was them, I still wouldn't agree to that contract since the Duke IP is worth a lot more than nothing. As a worse case scenario, 3DR could sell the IP to someone else for 40-60 million under the agreement that they have permission to finish off DNF, that would have solved all their funding problems and would have placed them in a much better financial situation compared to what Take-Two was proposing (in fact, Scott said if Take-Two really offered 30 million for the franchise as rumors claimed at the time, they would have sold it, even though it is worth a lot more than that).
So two notes, Take-Two had the ability to see DNF completed, they chose not to have it completed, and secondly, they won't complete it even if they got permission to do so - which they won't, because the contract clearly states the game has to be finished and that the code has to be requested in writing within 30 days of it going retail. So Take-Two doesn't have a right to the code anyway and I can't see this court case changing that. And if they acquired the Duke IP - which again, they won't, they'd simply sell it off to the highest bidder and make some extra money.
And finally, who cares if they've been working on the game for over a decade, it was on its way to being finished, that's all that matters... And in reply to "I'm sickened with people still taking 3DRs side in all this", I am sickened by your lack of competence to read the court document before posting on here.