Whose dick do I have to suck to get a custom title around here
#1 Posted 13 May 2009 - 12:50 PM
#3 Posted 13 May 2009 - 03:57 PM
I have it on my signature since that is what I was known as during the majority of my Duke modding career. I'd like to be recognized for the work I did.
#4 Posted 13 May 2009 - 04:02 PM
#5 Posted 13 May 2009 - 04:04 PM
Either "The Once and Future King" or "digital entertainment design", the first one preferred. Mind the caps on the second one though! I appreciate it.
#7 Posted 13 May 2009 - 04:42 PM
msleeper, on May 13 2009, 07:57 PM, said:
I have it on my signature since that is what I was known as during the majority of my Duke modding career. I'd like to be recognized for the work I did.
If you really want this user name you can have it, i really didn't know someone wanted it that bad.
#8 Posted 13 May 2009 - 04:46 PM
Captain Awesome, on May 13 2009, 08:39 PM, said:
Yeah it's not like I pioneered CON editing before and after EDuke was available and spent like 6 or 7 years modding in the community, or anything more than trolling a Duke forum.
ReaperMan, on May 13 2009, 08:42 PM, said:
No it's fine, I stopped using that name a few years ago. Just if anyone asks you about CON shit, point them my way please.
This post has been edited by msleeper: 13 May 2009 - 04:47 PM
#10 Posted 13 May 2009 - 04:51 PM
msleeper, on May 13 2009, 05:46 PM, said:
Umm, you're trying to claim you came up with CON editing? Hahahaha...
#11 Posted 13 May 2009 - 04:53 PM
Thanks Alan!
This post has been edited by msleeper: 13 May 2009 - 04:53 PM
#12 Posted 13 May 2009 - 04:55 PM
msleeper, on May 13 2009, 08:46 PM, said:
Ok, I will tell everyone who asks that you are the god of CON editing and you are the all powerful and mighty msleeper.
This post has been edited by ReaperMan: 13 May 2009 - 04:58 PM
#14 Posted 13 May 2009 - 04:59 PM
msleeper, on May 13 2009, 08:46 PM, said:
I was just taking the piss. I know very well how good you are, since you taught me a lot of the shit I know.
#15 Posted 13 May 2009 - 05:06 PM
#16 Posted 13 May 2009 - 05:09 PM
#17 Posted 14 May 2009 - 12:14 AM
Anyway...
#20 Posted 14 May 2009 - 12:43 AM
ryche, on May 14 2009, 04:14 AM, said:
Frankly I was kind of expecting that! At least that's what I would have done, if only for a few days.
X-Vector, on May 14 2009, 04:30 AM, said:
It's 10k, kiss my ass. It's not some 4mb monstrosity that some people try to use and don't understand why it's bad, IE that "Duke flip off" gif going around. If Alan or TX cares they can get rid of it for me. :stickingittotheman:
#21 Posted 14 May 2009 - 04:17 AM
zchri9, on May 14 2009, 04:34 AM, said:
There are laws about that sort of thing...
#22 Posted 14 May 2009 - 04:21 AM
Also maybe DeeperThought could have "Duke Plus developer"
#23 Posted 14 May 2009 - 08:10 AM
msleeper, on May 14 2009, 04:43 AM, said:
I for one am not opposed to animated avatars, as long as they're not ridiculous. If you, for example, tried to use one of those GIFs of the Burger King blasting Ronald McDonald in the face with a sawn-off, you wouldn't keep an avatar for very long.
#24 Posted 14 May 2009 - 09:43 AM
Alan, on May 14 2009, 06:10 PM, said:
So you won't be riding shotgun in TX' van?
#25 Posted 14 May 2009 - 09:53 AM
zchri9, on May 14 2009, 01:34 AM, said:
Nah, I gave you something better. Enjoy!
#27 Posted 14 May 2009 - 10:39 AM
TX, on May 15 2009, 05:53 AM, said:
I wanted to suggest worse, but he would start a flame war.
#29 Posted 14 May 2009 - 11:32 AM
#30 Posted 14 May 2009 - 12:06 PM
I don't have a problem with animated avatars or images in signatures, as long as someone is responsible about it. Keep the file size low in your avatar, and don't have a signature that is like 800px tall or something stupid.