TerminX, on 02 June 2019 - 11:57 AM, said:
Nah, that's bullshit. We responded to the C&D and they just didn't like the response. "Ignoring" it in this context means we didn't do what they told us to. They received a proper letter in response to the original C&D saying that we weren't going to change the name.
Fair enough.
August 14, 2018 trademark publication for Ion Maiden confirmed.
"
If no party files an opposition or extension request within thirty (30) days after the publication date, then eleven (11) weeks after the publication date a certificate of registration should issue."
Apparently Iron Maiden Holdings filed a grievance by September 13th.
3DR lawyers responded.
Iron Maiden Holdings didn't respond
So the natural thing to do was to file Request for Express Abandonment, because it's okay to abandon the name trademark after telling the aggrieved party you weren't going to. Registered trademarks are for suckers.
And the plan afterwards was to................??????
Keep using the name anyway. Maybe Iron Maiden Holdings won't notice the second time.
I'm not trying to grief you, but from the outside that's what it looks like, and those are the types of things that are going to be brought up if it goes to court.