TerminX, on 23 April 2018 - 01:34 PM, said:
It was always supposed to be a Duke3D reference, but some morons thought it was a political statement so I changed it around. The intended meaning is the exact same now as it was before.
TerminX, I understand why you changed it and certainly don't blame you or your team. The last thing you want as a start-up business is "controversy" over some daffodils' misunderstanding of a reference. I may as well have a wee rant anyway, not at you, but about the daffodils.
One of my hobbies, out of a selection of strange hobbies, is reading court transcripts. Especially transcripts of criminal prosecutions. Well, a few years ago I read one particular case that will stick with me for the rest of my life, or at least so long as my mind remains sharp. It was a rape case involving a child. The relevant part of the transcript was from an expert witness for the prosecution: the physician who examined and treated the victim as she was brought in. The physician explained the victim's wounds in appalling detail. The victim, the 3-year-old daughter of the accused, had been raped so badly that it caused a tear from her vagina through her perineum until that tear met with her exterior sphincter. But what struck me was the horrifying thought of her examination and treatment of that poor child as she was brought into the ER ward. Not her first-hand account in print and spoken word for the benefit of the investigation and prosecution -- there's always something lost in both.
The thought of that rape case horrified and offended me, understandably, but the emotional (and physical) constitution of the physician as she explained the victim's wounds with unemotional professionalism was something to be admired. Certainly beyond my ability. So when I hear/read of delicate doilies who get offended by nothing but their own tedious neuroses, I think of that physician and I imagine them in her place.