PsychoGoatee, on 01 June 2019 - 04:02 PM, said:
The 2 million in reparations thing is bad any way you look at it. A cease and desist asking for a name change, that's wrong and misguided, along with the absurd Shelly's name stuff mentioned. But the 2 million dollars thing, for a game that isn't even fully released yet, and clearly has not cost Iron Maiden a cent, it's just awful.
A C&D was issued around 6 months ago. 3DR filed to abandon their Ion Maiden trademark because of it.
3DR made the decision to continue to use the name anyway.
Exactly what did they think was going to happen?
If the case for the Ion Maiden name was that strong, why did Fred file to cancel the trademark? (back in December)
The reasons and correlations are stupid to us, because most of us have been here for years and can see how silly some of the accusations are. You're not looking at it from a clueless california lawyer's perspective.
Getting mad at Iron Maiden is about as dumb as the lawsuit itself.
Fred had 6 months to figure it out, he apparently decided to do nothing and hoped for the best.