
Hardware you should avoid at all costs "What's your experience with crapware?"
#31 Posted 03 May 2015 - 07:27 PM
#32 Posted 03 May 2015 - 08:21 PM
They aren't true quads. They share some resources like the FPU.
This post has been edited by Person of Color: 03 May 2015 - 08:21 PM
#33 Posted 03 May 2015 - 09:14 PM
This post has been edited by Princess Twilight Sparkle: 04 May 2015 - 05:26 PM
#34 Posted 03 May 2015 - 10:03 PM
#37 Posted 06 May 2015 - 03:20 AM
>Does the same thing again that caused him to be accused of trolling

This post has been edited by Comrade Major: 06 May 2015 - 03:20 AM
#41 Posted 06 May 2015 - 08:50 PM
#42 Posted 07 May 2015 - 10:59 AM
This post has been edited by Comrade Major: 07 May 2015 - 10:59 AM
#43 Posted 07 May 2015 - 04:50 PM
Person of Color, on 06 May 2015 - 07:32 PM, said:

Careful Princess Twilight Sparkle or you'll become like this guy below!

This post has been edited by DustFalcon85: 09 May 2015 - 05:47 AM
#44 Posted 07 May 2015 - 06:06 PM
#45 Posted 12 May 2015 - 12:01 PM
I say this because i ran into that exact issue. anything that uses a constant data stream was fine, but anything that needed lookups, like browsing the net, caused weird slowdowns and other bad issues. Changing the DNS fixed literally everything.
This post has been edited by Carl Winslow: 12 May 2015 - 12:03 PM
#46 Posted 12 May 2015 - 04:32 PM
Carl Winslow, on 12 May 2015 - 12:01 PM, said:
I say this because i ran into that exact issue. anything that uses a constant data stream was fine, but anything that needed lookups, like browsing the net, caused weird slowdowns and other bad issues. Changing the DNS fixed literally everything.
Thanks for the tips. I may reorder that router and revise my original post if your assessment turns out to be true. Its not expensive to the point where I'd feel burned if I tried to use it again.
#48 Posted 15 May 2015 - 06:37 AM
Also not everyone wants to use fucking linux or cares about how much manual setup you can do on a single thing.
This post has been edited by Carl Winslow: 15 May 2015 - 06:53 AM
#49 Posted 15 May 2015 - 09:26 AM
Carl Winslow, on 15 May 2015 - 06:37 AM, said:
Well... Admittedly, I do. And ASUS was one of the brands I was considering.
#50 Posted 15 May 2015 - 09:31 AM
Person of Color, on 07 May 2015 - 06:06 PM, said:
#51 Posted 15 May 2015 - 01:18 PM
Do not expect any consumer wireless hardware to run for months at a time under heavy load without issue, though. It just isn't happening. Even my RT-AC66U flashed with Tomato will reboot itself every now and then if it feels like it. I've got one of the other ones that still runs their ASUSWRT firmware set up to where it can usually run several weeks without issues, but even that isn't foolproof. Unfortunately, good 802.11ac hardware intended for commercial use costs a LOT.
#52 Posted 15 May 2015 - 03:21 PM
TerminX, on 15 May 2015 - 01:18 PM, said:
Might I recommend running a small box with pfsense. https://www.pfsense.org/ You can even control what chipset you use.
In case people were wanting to hear an alternative solution. =) Or they also offer their own in house custom chassis's now.
That's just my two pf-cents.
This post has been edited by Paul B: 15 May 2015 - 03:30 PM
#53 Posted 16 May 2015 - 08:40 PM
Carl Winslow, on 15 May 2015 - 06:37 AM, said:
Also not everyone wants to use fucking linux or cares about how much manual setup you can do on a single thing.
They make entry level routers for like $30, dude.
TerminX, on 15 May 2015 - 01:18 PM, said:
Do not expect any consumer wireless hardware to run for months at a time under heavy load without issue, though. It just isn't happening. Even my RT-AC66U flashed with Tomato will reboot itself every now and then if it feels like it. I've got one of the other ones that still runs their ASUSWRT firmware set up to where it can usually run several weeks without issues, but even that isn't foolproof. Unfortunately, good 802.11ac hardware intended for commercial use costs a LOT.
I wouldn't trust these under ultra heavy loads 24/7, but for low to moderate bandwidth usage they're pretty much tanks.
I stick with the Asus RT-N66U because of reliability reasons. It runs much colder, seems to be more stable software wise, and most devices still don't support 802.11ac. I haven't had any spontaneous crashes or reboots with them yet. It's only been two samples so far but they get tons of use. My brother has had an Asus WRT-N16 for over a year now and his is just as solid.
If I were maxing out my insane cable connection (127/37) 24/7 I bet these little bastards would drop like flies.
This post has been edited by Person of Color: 16 May 2015 - 08:44 PM
#54 Posted 17 May 2015 - 02:18 AM
Person of Color, on 14 May 2015 - 08:02 PM, said:
GET AN ASUS
That's stupid, I'm not going to invest R$400 on something when I can get a similar thing for less than R$100 that more than does its job.
If Asus offers a single antenna basic router, I could see getting another one. But so far my TP-Link has been working well. If it dies, I could get an Asus.
If Viper had to make do with the shit we're forced to use over here, he'd probably either kill himself out of disgust or become a genius of getting the most out of chink parts. It's the South American computer variation of Cuban mechanics, who have perfected the art of ogrelike, preprehistoric mechanical engineering in cars.
BTW I know a guy who's 40 and into MLP, if Radar is older than that he's hopeless. Not a bad show though. You'll see grown up bearded manchilds fawn over The Hobbit and that's also stuff for children, so...
This post has been edited by Duke of Hazzard: 17 May 2015 - 02:26 AM
#55 Posted 17 May 2015 - 05:30 AM
Secondly, many years ago I had a Linksys router which after a few years would randomly slow down connect speeds and I would have to hit the reset button every now and then. I assumed it was a faulty router so eventually I bought a new Linksys router. I find the same issue with the new one. It sure gets annoying.
This post has been edited by Mark.: 17 May 2015 - 05:31 AM
#56 Posted 17 May 2015 - 06:20 AM
#57 Posted 17 May 2015 - 01:15 PM
Duke of Hazzard, on 17 May 2015 - 02:18 AM, said:
I can't believe that costs a hundred "R" dollars. How much is that if you convert it from Monopoly money to actual greenbacks?
This post has been edited by Person of Color: 17 May 2015 - 01:15 PM
#58 Posted 17 May 2015 - 08:56 PM
Person of Color, on 17 May 2015 - 01:15 PM, said:
That kickass router you linked to costs $129. In my currency it's around R$390. Add in hefty import taxes and consider the minimum wage in the country is around R$800, and you get the picture.
#59 Posted 18 May 2015 - 06:18 PM
Move to a real country. The problem is your currency is backed by bananas instead of Jewish debt.