Duke4.net Forums: EDuke32 2.0 and Polymer! - Duke4.net Forums

Jump to content

  • 213 Pages +
  • « First
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

EDuke32 2.0 and Polymer!  "talk about the wonders of EDuke32 and the new renderer"

User is offline   Plagman 

  • Former VP of Media Operations

#3655

I uploaded a few development and comparison shots there for people that can't try it out right now:

https://plus.google....0418?banner=pwa

Here's a comparison between before:
Posted Image
Classic:
Posted Image
After:
Posted Image
10

User is offline   Fox 

  • Fraka kaka kaka kaka-kow!

#3656

I think you mixed the after and classic. It seems it has not been implemented to the HUD weapon yet.

This post has been edited by Fox: 07 May 2013 - 11:00 AM

0

User is offline   Plagman 

  • Former VP of Media Operations

#3657

Huh, good eye. I indeed mixed them up, and not because I was trying to show off either; I actually couldn't tell them apart at first glance. The shadowing in the HUD gave it away for sure.

You're right that it isn't hooked up to stuff drawn through rotatesprite yet.
1

User is offline   Diaz 

#3658

Oh yeah. I didn't notice anything because I don't use 8-bit art these days, but the first 3 Fusion episodes (which I'm still working on adding Polymer lights to, but still use the old .arts) do look better now. As mentioned in the changelog, sprites are shown with linear filter...

By the way, I've been looking through the Polymer history pictures... are those reflective (mirror) surfaces with per-pixel opacity still possible, or have they ever been?

This post has been edited by Diaz: 07 May 2013 - 11:50 AM

0

User is offline   Radar 

  • King of SOVL

#3659

Oh my. I've wanted that in the OpenGL renderers for so long. Now I really have no reason to use the classic renderer anymore.
1

User is offline   Gambini 

#3660

Posted Image
0

User is offline   Gambini 

#3661

Just did some tests with my map It lives.

I´m amazed. This is, with TROR, the most important thing added to Eduke32 in years. I can´t believe how well dynamic lights seem to blend with the shadetable shading. I tried to disable them with r_pr_lighting 0 but for some reason it didnt work.

Do you mind Plagman if I start to stalk you with reports and requests for the remainging issues distancing polymer to be the best renderer ever?

So far I´d love it to have a performance boost, voxel support, correct sprite clipping and increased draw distance. I know that´s not as easy as saying but if I fill your pm and email boxes ten times per day, you could have it done in a relatively short time. :)
3

User is offline   Micky C 

  • Honored Donor

#3662

This is cool, some of those colours like in plagman's example were way off the original game using the old openGL shading system.

However from what I can see with the polymer lights, well they don't actually light anything. Sure if it's bright enough you can see the colours, but when it's pitch black the polymer lights don't make it brighter at all. Will this be fixed at some point?

Edit: Btw I'm impressed with how smooth it is. It seems where in classic the colours change suddenly in straight lines, here in polymer the colours fade in. Would still be interested to see what spherical shading would look like as opposed to radial.

This post has been edited by Micky C: 07 May 2013 - 05:04 PM

0

User is offline   Mblackwell 

  • Evil Overlord

#3663

View PostGambini, on 07 May 2013 - 02:43 PM, said:

Just did some tests with my map It lives.

I´m amazed. This is, with TROR, the most important thing added to Eduke32 in years. I can´t believe how well dynamic lights seem to blend with the shadetable shading. I tried to disable them with r_pr_lighting 0 but for some reason it didnt work.

Do you mind Plagman if I start to stalk you with reports and requests for the remainging issues distancing polymer to be the best renderer ever?

So far I´d love it to have a performance boost, voxel support, correct sprite clipping and increased draw distance. I know that´s not as easy as saying but if I fill your pm and email boxes ten times per day, you could have it done in a relatively short time. :)



http://wiki.eduke32....er_Deficiencies
0

User is offline   DavoX 

  • Honored Donor

#3664

I don't understand, what is going on? :) For real I can't see the difference in those pictures, maybe I'm just too sleepy and need to go to bed for once....
0

User is offline   TerminX 

  • el fundador

  #3665

You can't see the difference between the old and new pics? You can't be serious...
0

User is offline   fgsfds 

#3666

Something goes wrong with bloodtc.

Software Posted Image Old polymer: Posted Image New polymer: Posted Image

All the textures with shade >30 turns pitch black: http://i.imgur.com/0WypGzq.png

Attached File(s)



This post has been edited by fgsfds: 07 May 2013 - 08:58 PM

0

User is offline   Plagman 

  • Former VP of Media Operations

#3667

Does that use the BLOOD palette as-is? If so, any chance you can send it to me? I suspect the difference lies in the amount of shade offsets, and I was looking for a way to test that.
1

User is offline   Plagman 

  • Former VP of Media Operations

#3668

View PostDiaz, on 07 May 2013 - 11:38 AM, said:

By the way, I've been looking through the Polymer history pictures... are those reflective (mirror) surfaces with per-pixel opacity still possible, or have they ever been?


Yeah, the code is there, but to achieve the effect you need to put a specular map on a mirror, which I think isn't possible right now because Duke3D removes the mirror tile. If there was a way to define mirrors through CON you could.
1

User is offline   Plagman 

  • Former VP of Media Operations

#3669

OK, I committed a couple of fixes in the last few revisions.
  • Fixed interaction problem with lights where dark shades could not be lit
  • Switched to spherical falloff; I don't think it's too shocking in comparison to classic after all, but if someone can make a compelling case maybe I'll add a toggle
  • Generalized the algorithm to accept any amount of shades, which should fix issues with the BLOOD palette.


Spherical shading is actually more straightforward and saves some computation, so on top of looking more correct it's faster.
3

User is offline   fgsfds 

#3670

Awesome. Old problem with too much darkness in polymer seems solved. Thanks.
0

User is offline   Plagman 

  • Former VP of Media Operations

#3671

Cool, glad it worked. I also just hooked it up to rotatesprite, so HUD stuff should now be properly affected.
2

User is offline   Plagman 

  • Former VP of Media Operations

#3672

View PostMicky C, on 07 May 2013 - 03:21 PM, said:

However from what I can see with the polymer lights, well they don't actually light anything. Sure if it's bright enough you can see the colours, but when it's pitch black the polymer lights don't make it brighter at all. Will this be fixed at some point?


That should be fixed now.

View PostMicky C, on 07 May 2013 - 03:21 PM, said:

Edit: Btw I'm impressed with how smooth it is. It seems where in classic the colours change suddenly in straight lines, here in polymer the colours fade in. Would still be interested to see what spherical shading would look like as opposed to radial.


Yes, I specifically added code to interpolate between different shades over the distance rather than having strict thresholds like classic, which would be less expensive. It looks better that way, and I bet classic would have looked that way if it hadn't been prohibitively expensive to do that kind of computation in software.
1

User is offline   Paul B 

#3673

From what I've noticed it looks like Duke is carrying a flashlight to see far off in the distance this doesn’t really appeal to my eye. (For example: The further away walls are the brighter they become and as you approach the distant walls they darken? Tthis seems a bit backwards. (Could this be because I am using a maximum brightness on the sectors I am in?). I've been fooling around and fighting with shading for ages on my map I am working on and it seems like a never ending battle of adjusting shades to make it look properly. What would be the recommended sector shade for mapping? All I want is consistency. Some of the values i've been toggling are R_Shadescale 1.05 which seems to look the best and of course testing the sectors with R_PR_Lighting 0 or 1 just to make sure the lighting isn't interfering with the sector brightness.

Revisions are coming out like hot cakes and I can barely test them as fast as they come out! Exciting! =) I'll try the last release to see what happens with the draw distance. *** UPDATE *** Yeah i didn't see any corrections pertaining to what I am talking about.

I would like to point out there is a pretty big discrepancy between EDUKE Polymer shading and EDuke HRP shading. HRP shows the wall tiles not as dark and it seems to handle the shading better from a distance unlike just regular Polymer without HRP. Hopefully I am explaining myself properly.

Something else I just noticed. r_pr_lighting seems to turn on okay from the console in game if it is disabled. But once it's turned on, the disable "r_pr_lighting 0" doesn't take effect until you quit and reload the current map. Not sure if this is the intended behavior?

This post has been edited by Paul B: 08 May 2013 - 08:39 AM

0

User is offline   Jblade 

#3674

This is very cool, although sadly this computer isn't up to using Polymer but it's pretty neat to know that it's much closer to classic now ;)

I have a very minor request about the minitext command, would it be possible to add an orientation command to it? I can't configure it to widescreen settings to it looks off in all of the HUDs when in widescreen mode.
0

User is offline   Diaz 

#3675

Uhm. But isn't Polymer faster than software rendering if not using lights?
0

User is offline   Jblade 

#3676

View PostDiaz, on 08 May 2013 - 12:37 AM, said:

Uhm. But isn't Polymer faster than software rendering if not using lights?

Uhm, no? ;) I have an integrated graphics card on a laptop so there's no way I'd ever get better framerates than in classic mode.
0

User is offline   Micky C 

  • Honored Donor

#3677

View PostDiaz, on 08 May 2013 - 12:37 AM, said:

Uhm. But isn't Polymer faster than software rendering if not using lights?


When it's optimised, sure, but at the moment, noooooo wwwwaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyy.

Try firing up parkade.map or any large moderately detailed user maps, disable lights, and be amazed at the difference. Parkade is almost unplayable even without lights, and that's using the original 8-bit art, not the HRP.
0

User is offline   Diaz 

#3678

Must be that my graphics card is faster than my CPU then, but I could swear I got framerates in the thousands when running the original game with no lights nor HRP - didn't even get near that with software. My work computer is a different story though, here Polymer is much slower.

Polymost is faster than software on both computers, though.

This post has been edited by Diaz: 08 May 2013 - 01:28 AM

0

User is offline   fgsfds 

#3679

Speaking of improving polymer. What about this http://forums.duke4....h__1#entry80706 ? It was there since polymer released and still not fixed.

This post has been edited by fgsfds: 08 May 2013 - 10:41 AM

0

User is offline   Micky C 

  • Honored Donor

#3680

The change in visibility when firing a weapon is much more noticeable in polymer with the classic shade tables. It's like every single texture becomes fullbright, and it doesn't look very good. Fire the chaingun and it's like midday. That reminds me, are there still plans to get rid of this effect altogether in polymer, at least when lights are enabled? It's just so redundant and atmosphere-breaking, and weapon-spawned firing lights do the job so much better.
1

User is offline   DavoX 

  • Honored Donor

#3681

I can, I thought there had to be a difference between the 2nd and 3rd.
0

User is offline   Mateos 

#3682

The BloodTC guys also posted a comparison here:
http://www.moddb.com...able-comparison

I think made this way it is easier to compare, as you can have all the 3 at once on screen ;)
0

User is offline   Micky C 

  • Honored Donor

#3683

It's definitely a lot closer, but how come that sprite on the wall on the left is yellow-ish when it should be maroon like in the bottom pic. And the floor texture has splashes of yellow when that colour isn't present in the original floor texture.
0

User is offline   Mblackwell 

  • Evil Overlord

#3684

View PostMicky C, on 08 May 2013 - 02:11 AM, said:

The change in visibility when firing a weapon is much more noticeable in polymer with the classic shade tables. It's like every single texture becomes fullbright, and it doesn't look very good. Fire the chaingun and it's like midday. That reminds me, are there still plans to get rid of this effect altogether in polymer, at least when lights are enabled? It's just so redundant and atmosphere-breaking, and weapon-spawned firing lights do the job so much better.



Sure, reprogram the weapons and don't call "flash".
0

Share this topic:


  • 213 Pages +
  • « First
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic


All copyrights and trademarks not owned by Voidpoint, LLC are the sole property of their respective owners. Play Ion Fury! ;) © Voidpoint, LLC

Enter your sign in name and password


Sign in options