
The Post Thread
#8131 Posted 10 March 2013 - 05:12 PM
For 50$ you could buy whole season of original series in hd. For $280... How many new-gen seasons are out on bluray, 3? Then buy all TOS+NG that are available. (you probably already have those, though)
Hmm, I should probably get around to acquiring 3rd season of TOS.
This post has been edited by Cathy: 10 March 2013 - 05:13 PM
#8132 Posted 10 March 2013 - 05:19 PM
#8133 Posted 10 March 2013 - 05:26 PM
#8134 Posted 10 March 2013 - 05:59 PM
Mr.Flibble, on 10 March 2013 - 05:55 AM, said:
Star Wars Holiday Special
Discussion over
I remember when that came on tv. i was a big star wars fan and i was all hyped up to see it....and then i wanted to gouge my eyes out about ten minutes into it
i don't know which is worse; that or Kiss Meets the Phantom of the Park
#8135 Posted 10 March 2013 - 06:06 PM
#8136 Posted 10 March 2013 - 06:28 PM
Cathy, on 10 March 2013 - 06:06 PM, said:
it was 1978. i don't know how old you were, but i was 9
#8137 Posted 10 March 2013 - 06:31 PM
Wait a minute... You're like 40+ now? Jeez, and here I though I was chating with some 19 year old. Oh well...
This post has been edited by Cathy: 10 March 2013 - 06:38 PM
#8138 Posted 11 March 2013 - 07:37 AM
being an idiot knows no age boundaries, so i guess it's easy to think i'm in an age group other than octogenarian
back to the previous topic - [granpa mode] times were different back then. no computers & internet, Atari 2600 & VCR's were relatively new and very expensive for the time, three channels on the TV to choose from -four if you count PBS- but it was only on a couple hours a day. So TV was a big part of home entertainment. There were no real video games arcades yet, so going to the movies was one of the more popular things to do when looking for entertainment outside the house. [/granpa mode]
that star wars special was a big deal at the time. the movie was a big hit, the tv network hyped it all up, there's really nothing competing against it on other channels, so anybody even remotely interested in star wars probably sat at home and tried to watch the first five minutes before shutting it off and changing the channel or opening a newspaper.
That's why it was panned as a big flop and goes down in tv history as a disaster. if it happened in this day and age nobody would even notice.
This post has been edited by Forge: 11 March 2013 - 07:57 AM
#8139 Posted 11 March 2013 - 07:43 AM
#8140 Posted 11 March 2013 - 07:49 AM
Cathy, on 11 March 2013 - 07:43 AM, said:
Until you're a guy again in 10 months.
This post has been edited by Achenar: 11 March 2013 - 07:49 AM
#8141 Posted 11 March 2013 - 08:01 AM
Jesus time is flying lately.........
#8142 Posted 11 March 2013 - 08:02 AM
Achenar, on 11 March 2013 - 07:49 AM, said:
nothing wrong with switch-hitting
might increase the chance to find mr/mrs right
This post has been edited by Forge: 11 March 2013 - 08:03 AM
#8143 Posted 11 March 2013 - 08:10 AM
Achenar, on 11 March 2013 - 07:49 AM, said:
Would it upset you?
#8144 Posted 11 March 2013 - 08:36 AM
Cathy, on 11 March 2013 - 08:10 AM, said:
my guess would be yes.
for someone who professes being pc and open minded about allowing people to be themselves Achenar sure has taken issue with your persona and feels it necessary to mention something about it every chance he gets
commence flame war
This post has been edited by Forge: 11 March 2013 - 08:37 AM
#8145 Posted 11 March 2013 - 08:49 AM
Forge, on 11 March 2013 - 08:36 AM, said:
commence flame war
OK. What the fuck does pc mean? Once I know this I can enter a true blue (yellow) flame war.
#8146 Posted 11 March 2013 - 08:53 AM
Forge, on 11 March 2013 - 08:36 AM, said:
I have no problem with Cathy's altering persona, though I do find it very curious. At your convenience please directly quote the post I made where I claimed to be "politically correct".
#8147 Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:09 AM
Achenar, on 26 February 2013 - 06:17 AM, said:
here's an example. there are many more scattered through this thread, skirt length, more clueless voters, that thread from awhile back involving heated discussion over homosexuality acceptance vs. gay bashers, but i'm not hunting them all down
being curious is one thing. just ask and you'll get the answer
constantly pointing it out leaves the impression that there is a problem
This post has been edited by Forge: 11 March 2013 - 09:15 AM
#8148 Posted 11 March 2013 - 09:45 AM
Well hell's bells, I never said that I believed it was harassment, and as I said, I certainly never claimed to be an expert on Internet etiquette. Yes, it set off a few alarm bells in my head when I saw certain skirt lengths being associated with being a "whore", a "slut", or a "prude". Where I work, someone could get fired or sued for that. But I'm making no judgment call one way or another, apart from the fact that I don't think it's very respectful to use those terms.
I can't help you if you don't have the patience to look at my apparently "politically correct" posts. Sure, I support LGBT rights and equivalency. But I'm not going to pretend not to notice if someone changes their persona (and apparently their gender) regularly over the course of a mere couple of years. I don't think there's anything wrong with that, but to me, there is no evident justification for this. At least, not one that I know of. We learn something new every day.
Quote
With all due respect, that's your problem.
This post has been edited by Achenar: 11 March 2013 - 09:45 AM
#8149 Posted 11 March 2013 - 10:03 AM
So even without getting the official definition of pc -
@ Forge - I can understand to object to a given post, I will never understand to try to personify one or a set of posts and draw a conclusion on the person's character. I need to look you in the eye, and then I make a call on Cool, Stupid, Sharp I don't think this is possible on a forum. All one can do is extract data.
This post has been edited by Hank: 11 March 2013 - 10:04 AM
#8151 Posted 11 March 2013 - 11:52 AM
I don't mean it, guys. I love you. I just don't know how to express my feelings.
This post has been edited by Captain Awesome: 11 March 2013 - 11:52 AM
#8152 Posted 11 March 2013 - 12:13 PM
Radar, on 11 March 2013 - 11:34 AM, said:
nah, it was almost a normal chat about nothing important, like in a pub, what was missing were little samples of skirts like
http://commons.wikim...-_rear_view.JPG
@ CA - I hate Captain Awesome, for sure, not sure why, but I do. This is like 8 years old or 5? I forgot.
#8153 Posted 11 March 2013 - 01:30 PM
No more flaming, no more spamming the forums when drunk and no more image quoting. No more console/PC argument taking up the whole thread.
I've made huge changes in my personal life, and I want to here. I know your all thinking WTF? or GTFO! but I had to say it.
Blackharted is dead. Over with. Finished. Gone.
Cheesy speech over.
This post has been edited by Duel: 11 March 2013 - 01:32 PM
#8154 Posted 11 March 2013 - 01:50 PM
This post has been edited by ReaperMan: 11 March 2013 - 02:03 PM
#8155 Posted 11 March 2013 - 01:53 PM
Hank, on 11 March 2013 - 10:03 AM, said:
So even without getting the official definition of pc -
@ Forge - I can understand to object to a given post, I will never understand to try to personify one or a set of posts and draw a conclusion on the person's character. I need to look you in the eye, and then I make a call on Cool, Stupid, Sharp I don't think this is possible on a forum. All one can do is extract data.
pc=politically correct
so who's excited and why am i left out of it?
i'm not drawing any conclusions. I'm merely stating that Achenar is normally an open minded and politically correct person when it comes to the subject of people and letting them be themselves without judgement. Constantly making it a point to mention that a man wants to now act feminine is contradictory to his normal behavior.
Achenar, on 11 March 2013 - 09:45 AM, said:
Well hell's bells, I never said that I believed it was harassment, and as I said, I certainly never claimed to be an expert on Internet etiquette. Yes, it set off a few alarm bells in my head when I saw certain skirt lengths being associated with being a "whore", a "slut", or a "prude". Where I work, someone could get fired or sued for that. But I'm making no judgment call one way or another, apart from the fact that I don't think it's very respectful to use those terms.
off point. you wanted me to demonstrate your political correctness and i found one example. there is no specific focus on the subject matter of skirt lengths other than showing that you have pc tendencies.
Achenar, on 11 March 2013 - 09:45 AM, said:
?? how did you draw this conclusion?
Achenar, on 11 March 2013 - 09:45 AM, said:
not everybody drinks the same flavor of cool-aid. it could have a personal, psychological, or emotional "justification". without knowing the reason, you really don't know what effect your comments have. I'm sure if you sent a private message and asked, you'd probably get an answer.
Achenar, on 11 March 2013 - 09:45 AM, said:
how is your insistent pointing out of the change in someone else's persona my problem?
i'm of the opinion that everybody should not be required to have "thick skin". A little politeness and common courtesy (which is your normal m.o. anyway) doesn't hurt anybody. If that fails, then ignore what's rubbing you the wrong way.
ah well, to each there own. you're going to do what you're going to do regardless of any discussion conducted in a forum
#8156 Posted 11 March 2013 - 03:19 PM
Achenar, on 11 March 2013 - 08:53 AM, said:
I also find it curious that you need to point out this every now and then.
Good thing english language don't have male/female specific word endings.

#8157 Posted 11 March 2013 - 03:32 PM
Hank, on 11 March 2013 - 12:13 PM, said:
http://commons.wikim...-_rear_view.JPG
That pic is obviously some girl from a conservative Amish community.

#8158 Posted 11 March 2013 - 04:14 PM
Forge, on 11 March 2013 - 01:53 PM, said:
Believe it or not my first thought was Personal Computer

Forge, on 11 March 2013 - 01:53 PM, said:
Not sure here.
How can anyone feel left out in a public forum?
Forge, on 11 March 2013 - 01:53 PM, said:
I think that people change. They grow all the time, sometimes in a wrong direction, but grow they do. If you follow any given poster this should be self evident.
As for a feminine behaviour in a male canvas, this is debatable. The mind can play a powerful role when left unchecked. The perception of a post may emanate a paradox, yet every paradox can be solved.
Finally, what is normal? Average humans are vicious predators and as such I expect the unexpected from a given person. So perhaps one wished to be 'softer', I see little wrong with that.