[TerminX]

MetHy, on 27 February 2016 - 06:26 AM, said:

You know how sometimes in historical fiction you see things from various periods mixed together? It's all "ancient history" you know, so who cares.
Well this is what it makes me feel like, like you get Quake-like environments, Doom-like weapons and enemies that look like they're trying to fit in a game boy colour game.

It's all "so retro" anyway, I mean, who cares?!

Well I'm sorry but personally I can't look at what seems to be dynamic light onto textures trying to look like they're from a NES game.

Yeah. It looks like some tacky, mismatched EDuke32 mod tbh.

[Mr. Tibbs]

[Forge]

[Sixty Four]

[Lunick]

[Forge]

Sixty Four, on 01 March 2016 - 07:51 PM, said:

I would pitch this game out the window after two minutes of those annoying sound effects, bad music, and the horrible one-liners. It doesn't help that who ever made the video has a hyper five year old with ADHD playing the game.

(yeah it's N64, I couldn't find better meme - it'll probably get ported to steam someday since it looks like they could make a quick cheap buck on it)

[Sixty Four]

Its me playing Forge

Lunick why do you quote someone in your signature who isn't even on this site anymore I just noticed that. I mean he willingly left wasn't even banned some attempt for him to come back?

[Lunick]

Sixty Four, on 01 March 2016 - 09:36 PM, said:

Lunick why do you quote someone in your signature who isn't even on this site anymore I just noticed that. I mean he willingly left wasn't even banned some attempt for him to come back?

Because the quote is hilarious

[Steve 64]

Hey Lunick who is High Treason talking about?

[Lunick]

Me, my gifs are obviously trying to DDoS every user of this site.

[Steve 64]

Hehehe Funny

[Sixty Four]

Makes you think though

[Lunick]

 Sixty Four, on 02 March 2016 - 12:25 AM, said:

Makes you think though

[Forge]

High Treason: ..."and he got pissy with me once when I kept down-voting him for posting GIFs. I had every right, he posted so damn much my browser kept crashing or at the very least dragging my CPU down whenever I tried to load a page, he should have been banned for effectively launching a DDoS against users. "

[Sixty Four]

How does that not make sense... Maybe I should of been more elaborate for the illiterate ones. This type of thing makes me question the character of one. Though I never thought you were a decent person anyway. To give you the benefit of doubt I was extremely tired. But High Treason actually did quite a bit for this community. Regardless of the rants he has contributed and also makes some of the cleanest maps ever.

[Forge]

 Sixty Four, on 02 March 2016 - 10:45 AM, said:

How does that not make sense...

because he was the only one bitching about it.
being banned for posting amusing gifs? might as well ban people for walls of texts or posting too many screenshots of Duke maps.
posting gifs and vids is not an attack on the site. if the admins & mods felt it was so, they could have put a stop to allowing attachments

 Sixty Four, on 02 March 2016 - 10:45 AM, said:

Maybe I should of been more elaborate for the illiterate ones.

Maybe I should have been more elaborate for the illiterate ones.

paradox. one would have to be able to read and write in order to make an account, log in, and make posts

 Sixty Four, on 02 March 2016 - 10:45 AM, said:

This type of thing makes me question the character of one.

by whose standard? yours? high treason's? mine?
None of these 'opinions' matter when taken as a single entity. It's up to the people who run this site to determine if what a member is doing is detrimental to the community

 Sixty Four, on 02 March 2016 - 10:45 AM, said:

Though I never thought you were a decent person anyway. To give you the benefit of doubt I was extremely tired. But High Treason actually did quite a bit for this community. Regardless of the rants he has contributed and also makes some of the cleanest maps ever.

again based on whose standards? Yours, or the community at large?
degrading Lunick's character does not elevate high treason's. (and I don't think Lunick had anything to do with high treason leaving this site other than not sitting still to be a punching bag for HT's assholish behavior)
when HT attacks people unjustly (especially when the people being attacked are trying to help HT}, and he goes on rants talking trash about this site, and he belittles every aspect of other member's lives ranging from their sexual preference, to their knowledge and intelligence, to their work on Duke & other projects, and that the attacked people should just commit suicide - how much does HT's 'work' really contribute to outweighing how much of an asshole he is and how much the community needs to tolerate his behavior?

-if HT is banned, it was posthumously done, as HT voluntarily left this 'fucking worthless site' on his own and vowed to never come back.
-stop drunk-posting

[Sixty Four]

Hey hey I am not degrading Lunick. I tried talking to him before but you know how that goes I have no issue and my perception will never change. Also, none of this is "for" High Treason directly. He is a friend and I don't think its right. By all means go with it I can't stop the grime of others. I'm just kind of wondering "it makes me think". He seems to be involved around people who either leave or get banned. Usually leaving some kind of brown nose comment (after there gone) while he sits on some high horse that doesn't actually exist. As a forum manager I understand having attachments available I wouldn't take that away either. Its not what he said its how Lunick carries it over. I mean the guy is gone I have talked with him recently though (not at all about duke4) give it a rest.

Yes to my standards this is weak and I have a fairly high tolerance and very easy going standards I am a nice guy who gets along with almost everybody. I just don't think its very normal of a person to do this. Its quoting someone who left unhappily from this place and mocking it. Not very cool in my book everybody here should know High Treason has had it pretty hard though its not an excuse to lash out but real friends would have reached out to him in a pm or email and tried. Not slightly mocking him while "trying to help" on duke4 boards. If trashing somebody else gets you off it normally means your not to happy about yourself.

Once again I am not degrading Lunick, I am simply pointing out that he is mocking somebody who contributed 100x more then himself in the Duke community. By the community I do not mean Duke4 I mean in general completely.

[Lunick]

I put it in my signature because I find it hilarious he has a problem with me still (the quote is from within a month ago) when what he says about me is completely untrue since I stopped posting gifs straight away after sending him a pm and having him explain to me why he didn't like them.

Just because someone contributed a lot more to the community doesn't give them the right to be a little shit. That's Brownfarted's job.

But again, I don't have a problem with him, just found the quote funny. If I really wanted to make people laugh I would have included what he said about Forge and Hendricks too but it wouldn't fit in my signature

The gif I posted above was just a joke btw, I didn't think you'd go off and write a couple paragraphs about it

[Forge]

 Sixty Four, on 02 March 2016 - 02:07 PM, said:

Also, none of this is "for" High Treason directly. He is a friend and I don't think its right.

good. i'm glad he has friends and doesn't alienate everyone.

 Sixty Four, on 02 March 2016 - 02:07 PM, said:

By all means go with it I can't stop the grime of others.
...everybody here should know High Treason has had it pretty hard though its not an excuse to lash out but real friends would have reached out to him in a pm or email and tried. Not slightly mocking him while "trying to help" on duke4 boards

I tried helping him. I also showed concern for his health. I also tried to offer computer components so he could keep working on his Duke projects and stay connected to the community.
He told me to go kill myself.

...and yet I still hold no animosity towards him. I won't ever trust him, but I don't hate him.

 Sixty Four, on 02 March 2016 - 02:07 PM, said:

He seems to be involved around people who either leave or get banned.
Its not what he said its how Lunick carries it over.

if you haven't noticed, i'm probably not too far away from the people who leave or get banned as well
is it really that hard to recognize a flagrant troll and get in line to hit them with a stick? (especially when they fling their monkey poo in your direction)
sometimes the poo is a badge - either as a reminder, a combat medal, or because it's just too damn funny.
-i don't agree or disagree about things like the quote in Lunick's signature - all I can say is if you're willing to put something down in text for all the world to see, you better be prepared to own it and be reminded of it.

[Steve 64]

Lunick by any-chance did you get a private message from me?

[Lunick]

 Demon Duke, on 02 March 2016 - 03:08 PM, said:

Lunick by any-chance did you get a private message from me?

Not since last year I think, there's nothing in my Messenger.

[Forge]

 Sixty Four, on 02 March 2016 - 02:07 PM, said:

I am simply pointing out that he is mocking somebody who contributed 100x more then himself in the Duke community. By the community I do not mean Duke4 I mean in general completely.

again with this 'contribution' logic of ranking people.

you've made more maps than me. your worst map is better than my best map.

Does this automatically give you a free pass to treat me like a piece of shit?

[Sixty Four]

Well I do want to say i'm not all pissy or anything. I mean it would be understandable if the member is around. That would be a different story and probably fun but your mocking a guy who isn't even here lol what exactly is the point especially when it was on his own terms. I just don't get it I really didn't mean to sound degrading of another dood on here. Lunick.. no disrespect I just don't agree with this.

 Forge, on 02 March 2016 - 02:42 PM, said:

-i don't agree or disagree about things like the quote in Lunick's signature - all I can say is if you're willing to put something down in text for all the world to see, you better be prepared to own it and be reminded of it.

That's correct and pretty much what happened. I saw it and reacted lol I never noticed that before not sure if its new or something.

High Treason is my buddy I would like to stand up for my buddies time to time. I hope I have friends like this to.

Its not contribution ranking honestly. But the dude is laughing as someone who did contribute leaves the building. I don't like it.

[Forge]

You do, and I'm trying to keep you from starting a piss and vinegar match that's going to lead to nothing good.


It's fine that HT's your friend and you'd like to stand up for him, but you need to realize that some battles are not worth fighting. What HT did here, he did to himself, all by himself. (multiple times)
It's like defending an arsonist that set fire to a hospital, because he's your friend and you want to have his back.

[Steve 64]

I see I must have forgot to sent it or something The message was an apologie to you for my rude behavior on the Duke Nukem Megaton Forums couple months back

[Robman]

 Forge, on 02 March 2016 - 02:42 PM, said:

all I can say is if you're willing to put something down in text for all the world to see, you better be prepared to own it and be reminded of it.

It was on my forum, and the conversation took place in a "closed" portion of the forum of which you have to be selected.. so I dunno how Lunick saw it.
So just to clear that 1 part up, it wasn't meant to be for "everyone."

What started that by the way was me ranting about how much Lunick and Hendricks pissed me off, this time it was for banning me on the Steam Redux forum.
Lunick, lose the sig. there's no need to carry that crap on any further.

Anyway, old news.. carry on.

@Forge ... I guess the apology didn't work? If he reads the last bunch of posts he sure won't be coming back, lol
I know I know... you don't care, just sayin'...

[Lunick]

 Robman, on 02 March 2016 - 05:18 PM, said:

Lunick, lose the sig. there's no need to carry that crap on any further.

No one here had a problem with it until Sixty Four spoke about it.

It is a non issue.

[Robman]

 Lunick, on 02 March 2016 - 06:54 PM, said:

No one here had a problem with it until Sixty Four spoke about it.

Exactly, nobody really does care. So why carry on a month old debacle.

 Lunick, on 02 March 2016 - 06:54 PM, said:

It is a non issue.

Hendricks is rubbing off on you. RUBBING!

[Lunick]

 Robman, on 02 March 2016 - 06:58 PM, said:

Exactly, nobody really does care. So why carry on a month old debacle.

Because I needed a new forum signature, there is no carrying on at all as I usually leave funny quotes from people around here in my signature

 Robman, on 02 March 2016 - 06:58 PM, said:

Hendricks is rubbing off on you. RUBBING!

You actually have it the wrong way around.

[Robman]

 Robman, on 02 March 2016 - 06:58 PM, said:

Hendricks is rubbing off on you. RUBBING!

 Lunick, on 02 March 2016 - 07:02 PM, said:

You actually have it the wrong way around.

Too much rubbing.