T2 Lawsuit Disposed? New documents! "Is the case over?"
#1 Posted 05 December 2009 - 12:11 PM
http://iapps.courts....ivil/FCASSearch > apogee
http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/F...date=06/03/2009
IF you click on "add to eTrack" a notice will appear that the case has been disposed and there might be no activity anymore.
Previously unseen PDF documents ???
http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/F...&isPreRji=N
This post has been edited by RuskiSnajper: 05 December 2009 - 12:32 PM
#2 Posted 05 December 2009 - 12:16 PM
RuskiSnajper, on Dec 5 2009, 01:11 PM, said:
http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/F...date=06/03/2009
IF you click on "add to eTrack" a notice will appear that the case has been disposed and there might be no activity anymore.
Previously unseen PDF documents ???
http://iapps.courts.state.ny.us/webcivil/F...&isPreRji=N
I sure hope it's disposed.
#3 Posted 05 December 2009 - 12:32 PM
#4 Posted 05 December 2009 - 12:46 PM
ultra tree 85!, on Dec 5 2009, 09:32 PM, said:
There is nothing in the search in Civil , nothing about apogee , only small private companies suing take 2.
#7 Posted 05 December 2009 - 07:19 PM
I'm still waiting for OFFICIAL word (from either party) and since that won't happen until things are fully settled out, I'm not sure why I am reading these threads.
#8 Posted 24 January 2010 - 03:55 PM
The case is disposed!
Does that mean its over?
Any law pro in here?
#9 Posted 24 January 2010 - 04:10 PM
Surprised you missed that considering it's been talked about in this thread.
OK... I thought it was said this was moved to a Federal Court?
Nothing's changed since last June.
This post has been edited by Zor: 24 January 2010 - 04:34 PM
#10 Posted 25 January 2010 - 04:09 AM
#11 Posted 25 January 2010 - 04:11 AM
Zor, on Jan 24 2010, 07:10 PM, said:
Surprised you missed that considering it's been talked about in this thread.
OK... I thought it was said this was moved to a Federal Court?
Nothing's changed since last June.
That's not correct. If they are saying the case was disposed, it has been settled/resolved. The term has nothing to do with
transferring the case.
#12 Posted 25 January 2010 - 04:13 AM
Jobi-Wan Kenobi, on Jan 24 2010, 06:55 PM, said:
The case is disposed!
Does that mean its over?
Any law pro in here?
If it was disposed, yes the lawsuit is over.
#13 Posted 25 January 2010 - 04:29 AM
that the case would be moved from the new york court. However, there is a motion afterwords that seems to indicate that the case was disposed(resolved)
thus the previous motion was rescinded. So on June 3, 2009 based on those documents, it appears the case was resolved. Anyone else?
This post has been edited by kaisersoze: 25 January 2010 - 04:31 AM
#14 Posted 25 January 2010 - 04:58 AM
I hope it's dismissed, but would we have heard about it by now? Maybe they haven't told us or something, wouldn't put that past 3DR. But again, I can't believe this yet, i don't want to, because I would be dissapointed if I was wrong
#16 Posted 25 January 2010 - 11:33 AM
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_case_d..._criminal_court
Then the case has certainly not just been "dismissed" but one of the two parties got penalized.
#17 Posted 25 January 2010 - 02:05 PM
Mr.Flibble, on Dec 5 2009, 08:19 PM, said:
It's like trying to look away from someone threatening to stab themselves to death with a Rubik's Cube. You know it's all going to end very badly, but its seeing how they get there that proves fascinating.
#18 Posted 25 January 2010 - 03:53 PM
Sangman, on Jan 25 2010, 08:33 PM, said:
http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_does_case_d..._criminal_court
Then the case has certainly not just been "dismissed" but one of the two parties got penalized.
so what does penalized mean in law language?
#19 Posted 25 January 2010 - 04:06 PM
kaisersoze, on Jan 25 2010, 01:29 PM, said:
that the case would be moved from the new york court. However, there is a motion afterwords that seems to indicate that the case was disposed(resolved)
thus the previous motion was rescinded. So on June 3, 2009 based on those documents, it appears the case was resolved. Anyone else?
All I get from searching that site was a single case that was disposed in june, ie. disposed by that court, because it was moved to federal. The only motion I found, associated with the case, was the request for the restraining order thing.
I'm pretty sure scott and george have referred to the ongoing lawsuit several times long after june, so unless any court events are actually dated from the last month or two (and you have no strange attractions to tinfoil) the sane thing is to assume status is unchaged, as far as public knowledge goes.
edit: what I mean is it's silly to argue/speculate legal semantics of "disposed" because according to the docs the date of disposal is june, and we know (well except the delusional few ) the case was still going on then
This post has been edited by hornoxe: 25 January 2010 - 04:08 PM
#20 Posted 25 January 2010 - 07:34 PM
hornoxe, on Jan 25 2010, 05:06 PM, said:
I'm pretty sure scott and george have referred to the ongoing lawsuit several times long after june, so unless any court events are actually dated from the last month or two (and you have no strange attractions to tinfoil) the sane thing is to assume status is unchaged, as far as public knowledge goes.
edit: what I mean is it's silly to argue/speculate legal semantics of "disposed" because according to the docs the date of disposal is june, and we know (well except the delusional few ) the case was still going on then
It doesn't mean the case is still going on. Maybe part of what the judge said was that nothing was to be released until the game was finished. No screens, no video, no nothing. Also, it is much easier for George and Scott to say the lawsuit is still going and that is why they cannot talk rather than say the game is being completed but we don't want to talk about it now. Much easier to keep a low profile that way and to keep the team finishing the game out of the spotlight. Remember that 3DR has said before that if they could do it all over again they would have not announced the game period. It only makes sense for them to be quiet now.
#21 Posted 25 January 2010 - 08:59 PM
#22 Posted 25 January 2010 - 09:27 PM
I personally think 3DR is finishing off DNF with some external developers and they will time it in such a way that the day before the court case hearing, they will announce that DNF has gone gold to pwn T2 in the very last moment.
#23 Posted 25 January 2010 - 09:43 PM
This post has been edited by megamustaine: 25 January 2010 - 09:44 PM
#24 Posted 26 January 2010 - 09:14 AM
Looking at it, they must crave having Duke at their side, as if another title running along side the GTA/BioShock series due to their place in VG history in terms of contravercy and the money they generate.
This post has been edited by Jason S.: 26 January 2010 - 09:17 AM
#25 Posted 26 January 2010 - 09:38 AM
Jobi-Wan Kenobi, on Jan 26 2010, 12:53 AM, said:
You kidding me? Punished
As Mr. Exclusive, you should know this
#28 Posted 26 January 2010 - 04:29 PM
Of course it is, that is where we get our words "Penitentary" and "Penal System" - both places where you don't want to drop your soap.
#29 Posted 26 January 2010 - 08:03 PM
#30 Posted 29 January 2010 - 03:54 AM
Steveeeie, on Dec 6 2009, 12:40 AM, said:
At first, sorry for my English, it is not my native language. Although I read this forum a few years now, this is my first post here.
I´ve got a question and I haven´t found answer yet - here nor the 3D Realms forums. The thing is - court documents as well as other court details about the case "Apogee vs. Take Two" are publicly accessible. At least it seems to be - my thought is based on the links in this topic - Justia and the other ones... We know that restraining order was not accepted and the case was moved to the federal court or it was/is disposed or it is just disposed for this court instance (I agree with this option). And that is all we can find. No more information about this case from federal court.
I don´t know the USA legal system. So - are documents and information about cases from federal court also available to public? Because I haven´t found any confirmation of moved case (something like official acceptance of case at federal court). How does it work in USA legal system? Does anyone know that?