Hendricks266, on 27 July 2020 - 11:48 AM, said:
We'll see how the next few weeks and months play out. Being aware of trends and taking advance preparation is being responsible, not alarmism, and any competent doctor will tell you how preventative measures are worth far more than treatment after the fact.
Doctors are more interested in selling pharmaceuticals than anything else.
Hendricks266, on 27 July 2020 - 11:48 AM, said:
Speaking of, when the government learned about the Wuhan outbreak in January the correct thing to do would have been immediately ramp up development and production of testing so that we could screen everyone when they enter the country at a border or airport.
>implying implications
No one even knew what the virus was at this point, except for the CCP. The smart thing to have done would have been to bar anyone from entering the country.
Hendricks266, on 27 July 2020 - 11:48 AM, said:
This is what countries experienced with SARS did.
Well they made that too. LOL
Hendricks266, on 27 July 2020 - 11:48 AM, said:
Later, the government stockpiled a bunch of a drug (hydroxychloroquine) which doesn't actually work, but Trump still profited from.
[CITATION NEEDED]
Hendricks266, on 27 July 2020 - 11:48 AM, said:
Typical Breitbart spinning something in the worst way possible. Leaving out negative results, whether intentionally or through clerical error, inflates the percentages, but does not hide the actual infected count itself. The only conclusion you draw from a high positive percentage is that you need to test way more people to actually understand how and to whom the contagion is spreading.
How do we even know the tests work? LMAO
Hendricks266, on 27 July 2020 - 11:48 AM, said:
Agreed that bureaucracy sucks. Could you elaborate on what you mean about LASIK regarding bureaucracy and commercialization? I searched and found information about its history but not the point you're making.
It's a free market.