Hollywood Reporter: John Cena in Talks to Star in Duke Nukem
#31 Posted 23 January 2018 - 10:21 AM
#32 Posted 23 January 2018 - 11:16 AM
And I have doubts about John Cena. But I see something similar between this art and my photo on the avatar
#33 Posted 23 January 2018 - 12:21 PM
MusicallyInspired, on 23 January 2018 - 09:23 AM, said:
Yes, for the lamest possible reasons: the cussing, and a scene with a naked mutilated female zombie. What happened was that the producers took the easy way out and thought of the laziest possible way to get an R rating, convinced that the rating alone would make it a success.
#34 Posted 23 January 2018 - 03:02 PM
I don't get why Hollywood has to take good ideas that made the games popular to begin with and mess with them. The whole idea about Doom being so great was that you actually fight demons from actual hell. But they changed it to good and evil genes and metamorphed evil creatures. Retarded. It's the hubris to think you can make such a drastic artistic change on such an established IP. Hopefully they won't do the same thing with Duke. Even if it does end up being crap, it'd be better if it was at least authentic.
#35 Posted 23 January 2018 - 03:54 PM
Mr. Tibbs, on 22 January 2018 - 07:16 PM, said:
Do you think we'll get this movie or a new game first?
#36 Posted 23 January 2018 - 03:59 PM
#37 Posted 23 January 2018 - 07:23 PM
besides, 3d Realms once planned Duke Forever to have "hard PG-13" content way back in the day. Duke wasn't about the F-word or actual bare boobs at one point earlier in time. Also you can have a pretty brutal PG-13 film when the point of carnage isn't depicted against realistic humans, though this all really depends on the context. It's not like the ESRB or TV ratings where it's based on absolute content intensity.
It's going to bomb anyway, or maybe not happen at all. Plenty of action movie history exists to make a live-action Duke movie feel redundant, and if they call back to the same old oneliner references it's probably potential legal trouble as well.
This post has been edited by leilei: 23 January 2018 - 07:34 PM
#38 Posted 23 January 2018 - 07:47 PM
Altered Reality, on 23 January 2018 - 09:03 AM, said:
Doom (the movie) = R
Which one was the borefest?
Anybody can cherry pick movies. Proves nothing.
Which alien killing movie was a bore fest?
Aliens or Predator
Which mad scientist movie was a bore fest?
Zaat or Dr. Goldfoot and the Bikini Machine
This post has been edited by Forge: 23 January 2018 - 08:00 PM
#39 Posted 23 January 2018 - 10:55 PM
Well atleast Cena is physically very fit to do the Duke role, so that's good decision to possibly audition him.
I wonder if there is gonna be any focus on the audio side if Cena were to be picked? Are they gonna put Cena to practice some Duke-like voicing or is it gonna be dubbed or just mainly ignored? Who knows, time will tell I guess..
#40 Posted 23 January 2018 - 11:07 PM
NUKEMDAVE, on 22 January 2018 - 10:18 PM, said:
Definitely man. He seems to be pretty good with the voicing and personally I found some Duke likeness on https://youtu.be/lJyG6Gu8wRM?t=45 aswell. I think this could be pretty awesome because like I said already above.. he has the physical ability to play him and to me it seems like it's quite possible for him to learn the voicing too. Wow now I'm even more excited about this
#41 Posted 24 January 2018 - 01:18 AM
Forge, on 23 January 2018 - 07:47 PM, said:
Which alien killing movie was a bore fest?
Aliens or Predator
What's the point here, exactly?
None of the R rated action films mentioned in this thread were boobfests.
It's all about violence and harsh language.
#42 Posted 24 January 2018 - 02:59 AM
KaijuTurtle, on 23 January 2018 - 08:00 AM, said:
I know this is Randy's biggest concern right now, and why he's been trying to do these little side projects with the character to try and build him back up in public consciousness, and, hey, I'll be there on opening day if a Duke Nukem movie ever makes it to theatres- but, again, I just feel like this is the wrong first step.
also John Cena is fine casting as far as im concerned, as long as they get the costume right. Hope to see him chomping on a big cigar lol
Yeah that will be a tricky situation... what story would they even base it off? The obvious choice would be Duke 3D, but that game is so old now. Duke Nukem Forever's story isn't really a good choice for an adaptation for a number of reasons. Neither is a prequel. And a video game-based movie has a hard time enough when it's at its peak, releasing a movie based on a series that isn't only old and inactive but have had its reputation seriously harmed, that seems like it could bomb even if the movie was (as unlikely as that is) great.
MusicallyInspired, on 23 January 2018 - 08:06 AM, said:
Spot on. I'd even claim Commando was considerably more of an action-comedy than Duke 3D is/was. I've always imagined a Duke movie (of the 90's) being largely similar (in tone) to Dolph Lundgren's "I Come In Piece" (a Predator 2/urban Predator ripoff, basically) - suited up aliens, some gore, one liners, moody soundtrack and cinematography and a quick strip club scene, with a typical 80's/90's action/scifi/thriller-with-a-dash-of-horror atmosphere with an attitude.
But then, Hollywood almost never makes game adaptations in the vein of their (usually very obvious) movie inspirations, because it's run by morons and games are typically based on last year's movie trends anyway.
X-Vector, on 24 January 2018 - 01:18 AM, said:
None of the R rated action films mentioned in this thread were boobfests.
It's all about violence and harsh language.
I do think it really should be R, but not for the nudity. Of course, Red Light District is such an iconic game level so it would make a lot of sense to have a romp through a strip club and sex shop, and their architecture could make for some good and fun action scenes, but there doesn't have to be - and in my opinion shouldn't be - a ton of nudity all over. The violence, on the other hand, I would consider non-negotiable. The detailed gore of Duke 3D was an important part of its presentation. Of course, most of it is directed towards aliens and mutants, so maybe you could still get away with a lower rating, I don't really know where they draw the line.
Well, I don't have any confidence in Platinum Dunes either way.
This post has been edited by necroslut: 24 January 2018 - 03:00 AM
#43 Posted 24 January 2018 - 05:12 AM
X-Vector, on 24 January 2018 - 01:18 AM, said:
None of the R rated action films mentioned in this thread were boobfests.
It's all about violence and harsh language.
which storyline (antagonist) would be boring
dr, proton mad scientist
-or-
aliens
Someone used borefest to describe PG-13 video-game movies. They (not I) also suggested that if it could get into the R rated realm, it might be better. I quipped that the vs. alien could be an R rated "boobfest" instead of a "borefest".
Simple minds latched onto the quip instead of the premise.
Now you know why there were wall-boobs in DNF.
Mystery solved.
This post has been edited by Forge: 24 January 2018 - 05:24 AM
#44 Posted 24 January 2018 - 12:24 PM
Forge, on 23 January 2018 - 07:47 PM, said:
My point was that an R rating is neither a sufficient nor a necessary condition to make a good Duke movie. If enough people say they want the Duke movie to be a "boobfest", the producers will say: "Okay, they want boobs, let's give them boobs. Let's not bother with trifles such as action, violence, good special effects or mindblowing scenes. Let's just give them boobs, and they will gobble it up."
Then, when such a movie comes out and it grants that request to the letter, the same people who wanted a boobfest will defecate their diarrhea all over the Internet and say "DUUURRRRRRR RUINED FOREVUURRRRRRRRR".
#45 Posted 24 January 2018 - 12:45 PM
#47 Posted 24 January 2018 - 01:41 PM
I do think there is great potential in a Duke film, and it's very likely that Randy Pitchford and Gearbox probably pushed hard to get something like this to happen in order to move the needle for whatever the future of Duke holds.
I don't have very high expectations of the film as of this date, but I could very easily be wrong. I thought for sure that the Assassin's Creed film would be a knockout punch, and I was bitterly disappointed, as even their moves to be faithful to the series and very much show Abstergo Industries were overshadowed by the reliance on too much focus on the modern-day storyline, a ridiculous Animus design that was solely done to avoid comparisons to The Matrix (newsflash-it didn't work and the games always wore that influence on their sleeve), and a rushed and truncated film that doesn't come close to the feeling and investment of hours of gameplay.
But, if the movie doesn't turn out well, I don't think it would kill off Duke. Like one said earlier, the 2005 Universal Pictures film version of Doom didn't kill that series off, and it only came back bigger and better than ever with the 2016 title.
#48 Posted 25 January 2018 - 01:10 AM
Toxic34, on 24 January 2018 - 01:41 PM, said:
But, if the movie doesn't turn out well, I don't think it would kill off Duke. Like one said earlier, the 2005 Universal Pictures film version of Doom didn't kill that series off, and it only came back bigger and better than ever with the 2016 title.
The series got kinda buried for ten years, though.
#49 Posted 25 January 2018 - 02:26 AM
1. Video game-based movies generally suck.
2. While Paramount is one of the Hollywood's major studios, it's actually the smallest one in today's market. The studio struggle to make a good picture, and almost every potential blockbuster turned out out to be a major flop at the box office. It's really not the best choise to make a Duke Nukem movie - Universal or Warner is much better options.
3. Duke Nukem's image has been wrecked since DNF fiasco, and it's really way, way too late to make a Duke Nukem movie.
4. Duke Nukem's fanbase is very small, so it can't guarantee a big amount of audience coming in. Most people just don't know who Duke Nukem is.
Heck, it will make much more sense if they'll make a Serious Sam movie. Unlike Duke Nukem, Serious Sam is still a successful franchise with huge following...not starring pro-wrestler though.
#50 Posted 25 January 2018 - 02:39 AM
Sanek, on 25 January 2018 - 02:26 AM, said:
1. Video game-based movies generally suck.
Just because video game based movies have sucked in the past, doesn't mean there's no hope for them at all.
Quote
It'd probably be best to make a new game first, to reintroduce Duke to the public.
Quote
Duke has a decent size fanbase, but not all of them are as outspoken as the good people of this forum.
#51 Posted 25 January 2018 - 02:44 AM
Fast paced alien blasting, over-the-top machismo and one-liners, and sure I'd go for Rated R if it's up to me, but hopefully they pull off a good tone and it's a badass romp. However it turns out, news like this is fun to see.
On Platinum Dunes, I found the 2009 Friday the 13th movie was pretty entertaining, and kind of retro. Their Ninja Turtles movie was appalling though, didn't see the second one. So this like anything could go either way, hopefully whichever writers land on this are solid, and somebody with the right idea makes it.
This post has been edited by PsychoGoatee: 25 January 2018 - 02:48 AM
#52 Posted 25 January 2018 - 04:33 AM
Just one question. If movie is successful, does that mean we will get game that is based on a movie, or not?
Also can John Cena pull off Duke's voice?
This post has been edited by Noddy: 25 January 2018 - 04:35 AM
#53 Posted 25 January 2018 - 05:54 AM
Noddy, on 25 January 2018 - 04:33 AM, said:
I think he can.
NUKEMDAVE, on 22 January 2018 - 10:18 PM, said:
When he says "Oh" at 1:50, it seems like he could have it within him to pull the voice off.I remain neutral on the subject.
This post has been edited by MusicallyInspired: 25 January 2018 - 05:55 AM
#54 Posted 25 January 2018 - 09:03 PM
I believe JSJs belief that there are no bad actors, only bad directors and chances are that Cena's talents aren't going to be used right since the studio is likely to hire some nobody that can be controlled and he won't do a very good job.
Still I stand by the notion that Cena makes for some easy poster material:
#55 Posted 26 January 2018 - 06:32 PM
In the end it's the choice of the ones who are making up the movie and the script to decide whether they want to extend the Duke Nukem universe to new horizons.
#56 Posted 26 January 2018 - 07:58 PM
#57 Posted 27 January 2018 - 06:44 AM
#58 Posted 27 January 2018 - 07:58 AM
https://goo.gl/images/8ShdQU
https://goo.gl/images/8ShdQU
#59 Posted 27 January 2018 - 08:10 AM
I know everybody has their idea of what Duke Nukem was and is so here's my idea of what I think Duke Nukem really is.
Duke Nukem to me, is a fusion of multiple Hollywood action stars like Arnold, Roddy Piper, Bruce Willis and a few others.
He's not even a sum of these actors but more like a collection of cool one liners and stereotypes all bundled together while his image is that of the perfect aryan man stereotype that was promoted in the nazi aryan propaganda.
I don't mean to say that whomever created him was a nazi nor a racist but him being a collection of macho stereotypes, seems to fit the bill.
The Blond haired, blue eyed well proportioned, fearless, smart, cool talking white male action hero.
The reality is that Duke Nukem is the absolute opposite image of what Hollywood wants to promote these days.
Hollywood is much too interested in promoting women action heroes and black heroes.
Duke Nukem is the ultimate insult to the political correct, SJW, Feminists and Black Lives Matter lobbyists.
Duke Nukem was cool because he was as politically incorrect as possible.
The reality is that most of the celebrities after which he's based on, are having a hard time shining themselves.
Arnold's post politics movie career is a joke and nobody takes him seriously anymore due to his age and due to how the times we are living in are forcing him to be so much more serious than he was.
Bruce Willis is a ghost too.
The 80's classic macho action heroes and male action heroes in general are frowned upon and looked at like they are meatheads.
Duke Nukem has no place left existin for the young generation that is brainwashed by hollywood with the politically correct bullshit.
Duke Nukem is only relevant to us old fans that lived in the 80's and 90's and grew up with this type of heroes and this type of humor.
Even I got bored of it and when I rewatch classic Action movies, most of the times the dialogue feels corny as shit.
For one, we've evolved culturally past the level of humor found in the 80's and 90's movies and Duke Nukem is just a collection of the old days and his jokes and muscles don't impress anybody anymore.
When I think and realize that muscly action hero type men used to be held in high regards even by myself, I wonder how the fuck did we end up where we are today.
The only muscly men that we can take serious these days, are super heroes such as Thor or Captain America.
There is no more room for classic action heroes, just super heroes.
While I do believe we have outgrown the 80's and 90's macho is cool stage, I also believe that we are manipulated into a wrong direction, where we have predominantly female and black heroes, even though females are not really suited to be heroes on a daily basis and blacks are minorities in the end when the line is drawn.
Why do we, a white majority of humans need to have black heroes instead of white ones? I don't have a problem with some black super heroes characters but hollywood is pushing it too far with their feminist agenda and their black lives matter bullshit.
Fucking games and movies left and right, recasting based on gender and race is a very common thing in hollywood now.
What he needs is a redo, where he's a pure badass that talks very little and has some cool stuff to say that makes him cool today not in the 90's
This post has been edited by Dacoolguy: 27 January 2018 - 08:22 AM
#60 Posted 27 January 2018 - 09:34 AM
If a Duke Nukem CGI movie meant that Duke would sound like he does in the video above, I'm willing to give live-action a chance instead. If Jon was still delivering the lines like he did back in the Manhattan Project era, I'd back his petition 100%. I'm not saying I'm against it either, I'm just on the fence about it and not taking either side. I know I have friends who support him 100% on it and I get that. It's also understandable. If I was in Jon's position, I'd want to be the voice of the character forever.