High Treason, on 15 August 2014 - 11:16 PM, said:
1. and what, you think ATI/Intel does? Newsflash, nobody cares about anybody but themselves. Likely you included.
AMD and Intel don't
sell defective chips to OEM's then try to cover it up. Intel came clean about the P3 1.13GHz, the i820, Cougar Point, and others. AMD admitted the Phenom TLB bug immediately after they discovered it.
Nvidia is an arrogant shitty company with horrible values.
Quote
2. You're selling a card? Oh, god, I hope you didn't overclock it because if it dies on the next owner you just might not have heard the end of it yet.
Look man, you don't know much about overclocking, we've already established that before. The only reason I popped my Biostar board was because I was drinking, hanging out with a friend, and typed in the wrong set of numbers.
I've overclocked everything from smart phones to laptops to AMD 5x86 chips...It always works, and it's always safe and reliable if you do it right.
How can you say no to free performance?
Quote
3. Chink? What is it with you and racist undertones.
Chinese people are awesome. Their food, culture, and history are amazing. But chinks stink.
Quote
4. All overclocks suck, if your machine is running badly enough that you think overclocking is necessary maybe you should take a step back and think about whether you really know what your doing, or the ad-ware, or the shit you left running. The performance must be that poor due to somebodies incompetence and computers don't really make mistakes.
My computer would eat yours alive, dude. Not that I actually care about who has the faster computer, I'm just trying to illustrate a point here. There's a HUGE difference between 3.3 and 4.5GHz, it's like going from something super fast to straight up science fiction.
Getting to skip an upgrade cycle for the cost of a $35 heatsink is badass.
Quote
5. You know when a toddler doesn't get it's own way?
You know when someone spends $400 on a "premium" product and it turns out to be anything but?
That warrants bitching. Four hundred bucks is
a lot of money, especially when it's nothing more than a component of a larger system.
DustFalcon85, on 16 August 2014 - 05:11 AM, said:
NVidia founder, Jen-Hsun Huang is not from China. He's from Taipei, Taiwan. Just to clarify.
UPDATE: I have your same level of hatred as yours Viper. But this one's not at NVidia but at Time Warner Cable.
TWC? I feel your loss. My brother has TWC in Manhattan.
He gets speeds of 30/5, and Cablevision gives us 101/25 for the same price, and we always get over 120 down.
Altered Reality, on 16 August 2014 - 07:09 AM, said:
O RLY? Is that also the case when you overlock a computer right after you finished assembling it?
He's said before that "overclocking is not acceptable in a production environment." Once he tweaks his first expensive build he'll enter the promised land.
I went out and partied a couple months back and just for shits and giggles I ran Prime95 again. 16 hours stable...but apparently trying to discover a new prime number is more demanding than video editing. He'll see my point some day when his crazy fast CPU renders a video at the speed of light.
Now if I could only fix the damn boot loops on this Gigabyte board. It does it at stock clocks too...just not as often. The new modded BIOS I have seems to help so far, if it starts looping again I just cut the power when I'm done using it, then flick it back on when I go to use it again and do it again next week. Weird, but so far, so good.
Quote
What were you trying to do, exactly?
The process of getting my nVidia video card to work with my HMZ-T1 head-mounted display (which uses HDMI) amounted to connecting the HDMI input of the visor (its ONLY input) to the HDMI output of the video card, switching the visor on, and switching the computer on.
HDMI to anything that isn't a television isn't an issue works fine with Nvidia. It's a real bummer too. I would have kept the card otherwise. The performance is fantastic.
Comrade Major, on 16 August 2014 - 07:14 AM, said:
But if I switch to ATI, what about Polymer?

It's disgusting anyway. But someone should really fix that. It's not good for the Duke community when over 30% of potential new members can't use your software.
Micky C, on 16 August 2014 - 07:15 AM, said:
If AMD drivers are so bad, why don't they invest some effort into improving them?
Because it's a meme perpetuated by Nvidia fanboys. It held water in years past, but it certainly doesn't now. Nvidia DOES have longer hardware support, but if you don't keep hardware for 5+ years it isn't really an issue.
Even back in the early 2000's, during the R300 era, Radeons had MUCH better DirectX drivers, but Nvidia fanboys wouldn't admit it. My old Radeon 9700 Pro had the most stable drivers out of any card I ever owned. I still miss that card.