do you think george b. laments..?
#1 Posted 11 December 2011 - 12:58 PM
This post has been edited by BFG9000: 11 December 2011 - 01:01 PM
#2 Posted 11 December 2011 - 01:22 PM
#3 Posted 11 December 2011 - 04:07 PM
He'll probably gamble away the money gearbox gave him within 5 years and file for bankruptcy.
#4 Posted 13 December 2011 - 01:59 AM
Judging by his attitude in the last 5 years, I would say that selling the Duke IP and DNF to Gearbox, was an amazing feat for him.
I am pretty sure that when Randy decided to offer him 20 million for the Duke ip, GB could not believe his fucking luck.
My opinion is that GB has fucked up epicly during these 15 years and at the very last second, he has managed to find THE gullible person (Randy) to save him and give him all of his lost money back, while Randy ignorantly believed that he will be able to save the ip and make money off of it!
This post has been edited by Mr.Deviance: 14 December 2011 - 02:46 AM
#5 Posted 13 December 2011 - 05:31 PM
#6 Posted 14 December 2011 - 12:59 AM
The game is amazing... for a 2004 era game.
#7 Posted 14 December 2011 - 01:01 AM
ThePinkus, on 14 December 2011 - 12:59 AM, said:
The game is amazing... for a 2004 era game.
I think that every time I play DNF. As a 2004 game, it would blow HL2 out of water, especially in the puzzle and physics department.
#8 Posted 14 December 2011 - 11:57 AM
Yatta, on 14 December 2011 - 01:01 AM, said:
Too bad those puzzles were most likely influenced by HL2.
#9 Posted 14 December 2011 - 02:56 PM
Yatta, on 14 December 2011 - 01:01 AM, said:
Me too, it feels like a great early 2000's game that has been sitting around since then and just recently reappeared, which I guess is pretty much what happened. I'm sure if it was released when it was supposed to be, it would have gotten 9's and 10's everywhere. Which I don't really think it would have deserved, but that's another point.
#10 Posted 15 December 2011 - 02:05 AM
Yatta, on 14 December 2011 - 01:01 AM, said:
I'm currently playing Half-Life 2 all the way through for the first time (I stopped at Ravenholm previously and never continued) and even though I can't truly love the game as I did the original Half-Life, it's still got far more quality and class to its design than Duke Nukem Forever.
The world of HL2 'feels' different from that of HL1 and features too much funneling and "hoop jumping" for my taste, but it has a believability and atmosphere that makes me want to discover what's next, where DNF just seems like a depressing chore to play through.
#11 Posted 15 December 2011 - 09:29 AM
Yatta, on 14 December 2011 - 01:01 AM, said:
Are you on crack?
#12 Posted 15 December 2011 - 01:24 PM
Yatta, on 14 December 2011 - 01:01 AM, said:
And if my granny had two wheels, she'd be a bicycle.
The fact of the matter is, though, the game was released in 2011, and that is the unmistakable truth that we all have to deal with.
#13 Posted 17 December 2011 - 06:27 AM
Yatta, on 14 December 2011 - 01:01 AM, said:
Heavily disagree. I think HL2 totally brutalizes DNF in every way imaginable. Can't really understand how you think the graphics or physics in DNF are better. They suck balls. At their best, the physics puzzles are pale imitations of what you found in HL2.
#14 Posted 17 December 2011 - 11:06 AM
#15 Posted 17 December 2011 - 11:45 AM
Yatta, on 14 December 2011 - 01:01 AM, said:
Ha so funny
#16 Posted 17 December 2011 - 12:32 PM
rasmus thorup, on 17 December 2011 - 11:06 AM, said:
What videos are you referring to?
Perhaps there are more, but I personally know of only 3 videos of DNF that show stuff from before 2004.
- 1998 Trailer, no physics puzzles
- 2001 Trailer, no physics puzzles
- 2003 gameplay footage, no physics puzzles
This post has been edited by fuegerstef: 17 December 2011 - 12:42 PM
#17 Posted 28 December 2011 - 08:04 PM
Far Cry would have kicked DNF ass so hard back in 2004. that game deserved to be GOTY instead of Hl2.
This post has been edited by Graywolf: 28 December 2011 - 08:04 PM