
The Post Thread
#8553 Posted 21 April 2013 - 08:53 PM
This post has been edited by 486DX2: 21 April 2013 - 08:53 PM
#8554 Posted 22 April 2013 - 06:50 PM
#8555 Posted 22 April 2013 - 07:07 PM
This post has been edited by Micky C: 22 April 2013 - 07:08 PM
#8558 Posted 23 April 2013 - 06:01 PM
Just have to do the hand-in assignments and I'm done. The previous 9 chapters were the learning material and the hand-in stuff will be the material which gets marked and graded. Then I have to write the exam.
#8559 Posted 23 April 2013 - 08:16 PM
This post has been edited by Lunick: 23 April 2013 - 08:18 PM
#8563 Posted 24 April 2013 - 05:44 PM
#8564 Posted 25 April 2013 - 12:41 PM
People should pick it up and read it.
#8566 Posted 26 April 2013 - 09:13 AM

This post has been edited by underTaker: 26 April 2013 - 09:13 AM
#8567 Posted 26 April 2013 - 09:41 AM
underTaker, on 26 April 2013 - 09:13 AM, said:

#8568 Posted 26 April 2013 - 09:59 AM



#8570 Posted 26 April 2013 - 12:25 PM
Mr.Flibble, on 25 April 2013 - 12:41 PM, said:
Can't imagine that being too difficult.

Couldn't help it.
#8571 Posted 26 April 2013 - 02:25 PM
#8572 Posted 26 April 2013 - 02:33 PM
To make matters worse, one of our power substations decided to set fire too.
#8573 Posted 26 April 2013 - 04:01 PM
This post has been edited by Sangman: 26 April 2013 - 04:02 PM
#8574 Posted 26 April 2013 - 04:34 PM
Ronan, on 26 April 2013 - 12:25 PM, said:

Couldn't help it.
It actually is when you are using the Bible. There is very little in the New Testament than can really be interpreted to mean that Jesus was not God or in some way more than human. Erhman wants to have the Bible but not have a divine or even quasi-divine Jesus (or even God), which is basically impossible. The only way is to reject most of the contents of the Bible, including the letters of Paul which are almost certainly from the 40s-50s (at least the ones that are by Paul himself, not Ephesians, Colossians, or the pastorals). He does history and does it quite well I think, but he has to reject so much theology in the process.
This does not negate his scholarship and work. I very much respect his historical research and writing despite the fact that I disagree with him on interpretations and even some of the details of his historical analysis.
#8575 Posted 26 April 2013 - 04:47 PM
Sangman, on 26 April 2013 - 04:01 PM, said:
Drink enough to get loose and then cut yourself off. I'm sure you already know this, but yeah. I hate going to clubs too, but I go almost every time I'm invited just because. Actually had a good time here and there, even if the people, music, and food is shitty.

#8577 Posted 27 April 2013 - 01:33 AM
JoJo the Idiot Circus Boy, on 26 April 2013 - 04:47 PM, said:
I would but I'm on meds. So no.
#8578 Posted 27 April 2013 - 04:53 AM
#8580 Posted 27 April 2013 - 05:58 AM
Sangman, on 27 April 2013 - 01:33 AM, said:
Ouch. Unless you have a small IQ, clubs are an assured bad time if you have to go sober. I think it's because alcohol kills all your brain cells.

This post has been edited by JoJo the Idiot Circus Boy: 27 April 2013 - 05:59 AM