TheMuseumCurator, on 10 June 2021 - 06:06 PM, said:
I mean we honestly had no evidence the talk show / autograph for a fan sequences in the finished game had any antecedents in the 2002 build until those shots leaked the other week. The mystery of what is really all there & how it all changed from year to year is still something that keeps us interested after all this time. I was looking at the Duke Nukem Forever shortcut on my desktop & thinking "There it is, but in way? There it ISN'T. Even after all this time..."
That's a good observation - similar fascination to how it takes seven years for the human body to renew its entire cell stock and the idea of that seems to puzzle some people - like it's supposed to be a paradox, 'seven years ago I was the same person, and yet a completely different person!'. The religious connotations are strong, too, when people want to believe in the game they didn't get over the one that they did in fact get.
Thread is a funny coincidence because I usually don't obsess over DNF myself, and yet here I was just an hour ago rewatching all the trailers (in fact, that
YouTube tab is still open). You can indeed see all the Duke 3D fiber fade a little further away with every new presented build, as the development progressively lost its way towards racing against tech and becoming a prisoner of its own original ideas. I know a lot of people prefer the look of the 2001 build but personally I was always enthusiastic about the 1998 one the most, perhaps it's the graphics, perhaps the era-flavored tech but that one always felt like the most honest extension from Duke 3D to me. So many ideas were present already - that were then exclusively polished for too long, to the point of exhaustion.