Original Build editor "where to find it?"
#1 Posted 20 March 2017 - 12:13 AM
I'm looking for the original, MS-DOS-based build editor for the original game.
The information is probably visible plain and open here and elsewhere, but personally, I couldn't find it to save my life.
Everybody just keeps telling "use Mapster/eDuke, it's better and runs on new Windows".
But what I want to do is creating a satirical game (Nazi Dinosaurs from outer Space) with a fictional history - pretending that the game orginated in the 1980ties or so - so there should be a "new" version with (halfways) modern graphics (Far Cry level), and at least one "old" version with 2.5D graphics, that runs on a 486 on DOS. Obviousely, the "modern" version I can't do all alone, but the "vintage" version, I probably can. Not saying I will do it anytime soon, I'm not in a hurry, probably will try to make some smaller an easier-to-do maps before. But the idea is to do "vintage" games that would actually run on vintage computers.
If it doesn't run on modern Windows (without emulator), that's all the better, it would add to the desired vintage flavour.
I know there was a DOS-based map editor, I owned it and used it years ago, but I can't find it anymore...
Or am I completely wrong, and I can use eDuke to create maps for the original engine?
Thanx and greetings
Ben
This post has been edited by Big Bene: 20 March 2017 - 12:15 AM
#2 Posted 20 March 2017 - 01:22 AM
#3 Posted 20 March 2017 - 01:46 AM
Big Bene, on 20 March 2017 - 12:13 AM, said:
Mapster32 comes with EDuke32 and creates map files that are identical with the original editor (unless you specifically create new effects like TROR). Plus, it's more stable and generally more user-friendly.
#4 Posted 20 March 2017 - 03:17 AM
Big Bene, on 20 March 2017 - 12:13 AM, said:
You can, and I'd recommend doing so because Mapster32 has a LOT of small things which make mapping easier and faster, but make sure you test your map in DOS Duke as you Build it, rather than just testing it in EDuke32.
EDuke32 supports features which the original game doesn't, and if you only test your map in EDuke32 thinking it's "vanilla" just because you don't use TROR and the likes, you could be wrong.
Some of these EDuke32 only features are obvious, but some are not and even experienced mappers (who usually only play in EDuke32) wouldn't even know their stuff isn't vanilla compatible. For instance, the subway effect can only carry active sprites in vanilla, but in EDuke32 it can carry any sprite. Also the rocket ship from E2L1 can be placed at a much higher height in EDuke32 than that of the player, but not so much in vanilla. In EDuke32 you can have textures with transparency behind a semi transparent mask wall, but in vanilla that would appear pink. Etc.
There isn't exactly a list of differences like this and some might even be unknown so you'll just have to test your map in DOS to make sure it's vanilla compatible.
This post has been edited by MetHy: 20 March 2017 - 03:18 AM
#5 Posted 20 March 2017 - 03:45 AM
Lunick said:
I don't own the CD anymore. I recently downloaded the Atomic Edition, but the build.exe file was missing. Which release should I look for?
Daedolon, on 20 March 2017 - 01:46 AM, said:
I got this impression, too, so I actually hoped for an answer like this.
But after reading this thread, I see that backwards compability (though certainly intended) seems to be a problem:
Quote
Other random examples :
-some sprites will appear all glitchy if you make them floor aligned in DOS Duke, but not in EDuke32. I think it has to do with the size of the textures/sprites used; not all sizes used to support floor alignment.
-if you use a semi-transparent mask wall, and behind that mask wall use a texture on a wall that also has transparency; that transparency part of the texture, instead of being black like it is normally (with no mask wall in front of it) it will appear pink so long as there is that semi-transparent mask wall in front of it. However in EDuke32, it does appear black no matter what which means you have more freedom as far as what to put behind semi-transparent mask walls are concerned.
Quote
Quote
Since there is no list of all the small differences like this between vanilla and EDuke32, if you want to do a vanilla map, the best thing remains to test your map every so-often to make sure it behaves normally in DOS Duke. Again, even with the extra trouble of having to do that, it still is worth it to map in mapster32 over the old Build due to all the new features added to the editor.
Quote
It's that kind of thing that concerned me and made me ask for the old build.exe to begin with.
The very idea of doing anything with Duke3D or the Build engine is having it backwards compatible, enjoing the fact that my content could at least theoretically be run on a 4´86 machine, otherwise I would go straight to the Unreal engine, frankly spoken.
I have worked with the orignial build.exe in the past, and it was good fun. This doesn't mean I'm fixed to it, if the benefits of Mapster really are so overwhelming as described, I'm the last one to denounce it, but it has to be 100% backward compatible to the original engine, that's the one and only essential point, otherwise I see no point in doing it at all. If anyone can show me a way to guarantee backward compatibility, I'm more than ready to use Mapster.
To put it clear: I do not have a 486 running at the moment. I use DosBox under Ubuntu. It's just about how my own nostalgic feelings work.
#6 Posted 20 March 2017 - 03:48 AM
MetHy, on 20 March 2017 - 03:17 AM, said:
EDuke32 supports features which the original game doesn't, and if you only test your map in EDuke32 thinking it's "vanilla" just because you don't use TROR and the likes, you could be wrong.
...
Cross-posted, I wrote my reply to Lunick and Daedalon before reading your post.
I will have to go back to work now, so sorry I can't react further before tomorrow.
Thanx for all the input!
#7 Posted 20 March 2017 - 03:51 AM
You may be trying things with some effects, and see that it doesn't work, so you'll try something else. The same way you would if you were using Build but with more comfort.
I'm just saying that MAYBE, in some rare cases, that same thing could have worked in EDuke32 and also that one who tests his map in EDuke32 only shouldn't take for granted vanilla compatibility just because he didn't use big features like TROR.
#8 Posted 20 March 2017 - 04:24 AM
Mapster32 is completely backwards compatible with the original game. 100% guaranteed.
ALL of the concerns you've pointed out can be done in the original build editor just as easily as mapster32. It makes no difference. On the game side eduke has extra fixes, but the game fixes can be taken advantage of by the original build. The only concern is whether you choose to use to take advantages of the fixes or not.
This post has been edited by Micky C: 20 March 2017 - 04:25 AM
#9 Posted 20 March 2017 - 05:09 AM
; Game executable used for map testing gameexecutable = eduke32.exe
#10 Posted 20 March 2017 - 05:14 AM
#11 Posted 20 March 2017 - 08:52 AM
MetHy, on 20 March 2017 - 03:17 AM, said:
EDuke32 supports features which the original game doesn't, and if you only test your map in EDuke32 thinking it's "vanilla" just because you don't use TROR and the likes, you could be wrong.
Some of these EDuke32 only features are obvious, but some are not and even experienced mappers (who usually only play in EDuke32) wouldn't even know their stuff isn't vanilla compatible. For instance, the subway effect can only carry active sprites in vanilla, but in EDuke32 it can carry any sprite. Also the rocket ship from E2L1 can be placed at a much higher height in EDuke32 than that of the player, but not so much in vanilla. In EDuke32 you can have textures with transparency behind a semi transparent mask wall, but in vanilla that would appear pink. Etc.
There isn't exactly a list of differences like this and some might even be unknown so you'll just have to test your map in DOS to make sure it's vanilla compatible.
One more typical update:
In the original Build you couldn't build a two-way train and Reconcars with different paths. This is possible with Mapster, although Reconcar locators must be built later, or you will see the shortcomings like seen in Golden Carnage.
Also, AFAIK you can connect now two underwater sectors with two-way teleport. That wasn't possible earlier, and some levels like Lost Highway L3 were screwed by it.
This post has been edited by Nancsi: 20 March 2017 - 08:54 AM
#12 Posted 20 March 2017 - 09:05 AM
#13 Posted 20 March 2017 - 09:35 AM
http://www.jonof.id.au/jfduke3d
Of course, Mapster is the more capable editor overall, so if you're willing to keep your mind on not breaking compatibility, it is probably the easier option overall.
#14 Posted 21 March 2017 - 01:25 AM
Hendricks266, on 20 March 2017 - 05:14 AM, said:
Time to whip out the mapster from the EDuke16 project you were working on eh?
#15 Posted 21 March 2017 - 01:42 AM
Just a short question:
I will give Mapster a try, can you give me a hint wich version I should get?
On the download page, it says it works on Linux, but there's no obvious Linux version shown to choose.
#16 Posted 21 March 2017 - 01:46 AM
#17 Posted 21 March 2017 - 01:48 AM
Big Bene, on 21 March 2017 - 01:42 AM, said:
Just a short question:
I will give Mapster a try, can you give me a hint wich version I should get?
On the download page, it says it works on Linux, but there's no obvious Linux version shown to choose.
What Daedolon said. The build instructions are on the wiki: http://wiki.eduke32....Duke32_on_Linux
#18 Posted 21 March 2017 - 06:17 AM
Why are Linux versions not supplied with every new revision? Is it:
A. legal issues in combining all the library files together for public download
B. too much time and effort involved
C. It builds differently on each computer therefore its left up to each Linux user
#19 Posted 21 March 2017 - 02:06 PM
#20 Posted 24 March 2017 - 09:03 AM
Micky C, on 20 March 2017 - 04:24 AM, said:
Mapster32 is completely backwards compatible with the original game. 100% guaranteed.
ALL of the concerns you've pointed out can be done in the original build editor just as easily as mapster32. It makes no difference. On the game side eduke has extra fixes, but the game fixes can be taken advantage of by the original build. The only concern is whether you choose to use to take advantages of the fixes or not.
Well, you seem to have hit the nail on the head. Not to disregard the others - lots of useful information there, and great friendly comments, will answer to all of this below.
Of course I did not confuse editor and game or engine. I clearly see the difference between build.exe and the Build engine, between Mapster and eDuke, and the games running at these engines, but I falsely assumed that all problems about backwards compability are caused by Mapster being functional mainly for eDuke and using incompatible eDuke effects.
I thought by using build.exe, I could guarantee compability. Your post set that straight.
So, I'm in for Mapster now.
MetHy, on 20 March 2017 - 03:51 AM, said:
Still looking for build.exe, however, just out of couriosity:
Big Bene said:
Lunick said:
I don't own the CD anymore. I recently downloaded the Atomic Edition, but the build.exe file was missing. Which release should I look for?
Well, I did look at GOG, but they don't offer DN3D. Same at the sites of 3DRealm ("unavailable") and GearBox.
I had the original CD ages ago, but don't have it anymore. Recently downloaded an unofficial copy of the Atomic Edition, just to show my son one of the games of old. I don't want to use this, probably illegal, copy for long, plus, it didn't include the build.exe file anyways. There must be some way to legally get a copy of DN3D, musn't it?
And which version does include the editor? All or just some of them?
Now for Mapster:
Quote
Why are Linux versions not supplied with every new revision? Is it:
A. legal issues in combining all the library files together for public download
B. too much time and effort involved
C. It builds differently on each computer therefore its left up to each Linux user
A: Why would this be? And why putting them all together, if this is a legal issue? You could use various sources, in Linux just like in Windows.
B: If
C: When it works on one Ubuntu Linux, it should work on all, such already reaching a significant percentage of all Desktop Linux computers. One or two more of the most widely distributed versions would suffice to reach almost all. There are uncounted Linux distributions, but most are rather rare.
Daedolon, on 21 March 2017 - 01:46 AM, said:
Micky C, on 21 March 2017 - 01:48 AM, said:
The descriptions read a bit complicated, but I'll try.
I'm relatively new to Linux, have used it very sporadic in the past, only changed ultimatively after the nauseance that was the Windows10 advertising campaign and the discontiuation of XP updates. I could do quite some tricks in Win XP, but sitll have much to learn in Linux.
Drek, on 20 March 2017 - 05:09 AM, said:
; Game executable used for map testing gameexecutable = eduke32.exe
Hendricks266, on 20 March 2017 - 05:14 AM, said:
Daedolon said:
Will try. Thanks a lot!
This post has been edited by Big Bene: 24 March 2017 - 09:05 AM
#21 Posted 24 March 2017 - 09:25 AM
#22 Posted 24 March 2017 - 12:58 PM
Hendricks266, on 24 March 2017 - 09:25 AM, said:
Already used,all of them. Will email yatta@duke4.net.
Thanx a lot, anyway
#23 Posted 24 March 2017 - 10:35 PM
Big Bene, on 24 March 2017 - 12:58 PM, said:
Thanx a lot, anyway
Here you go, youngloov.
FAF9B-9F3B6-8414B-1372D
Redeem at https://www.gog.com/...bdf0e53685674f7
#24 Posted 26 March 2017 - 07:32 AM
Yatta, on 24 March 2017 - 10:35 PM, said:
Well, thank you very much for helping me before I actually asked, and for providing those codes in general.
The code you posted above links to Shadow Warrior, not DN3D. I downloaded it anyway, thanks a lot.
Does it contain the build editor? Is there a reason you didn't point to Duke?
#25 Posted 26 March 2017 - 11:26 AM
Big Bene, on 26 March 2017 - 07:32 AM, said:
The code you posted above links to Shadow Warrior, not DN3D. I downloaded it anyway, thanks a lot.
Does it contain the build editor? Is there a reason you didn't point to Duke?
Shadow Warrior has its own Build Editor, to suit Shadow Warrior, it works to a certain extend for Duke, but I do not recommend making a Duke map with it.
or download the original set here, for 'educational' purposes.
https://archive.org/..._1996_3D_Realms
This post has been edited by Hank: 27 March 2017 - 04:44 PM
#26 Posted 26 March 2017 - 11:00 PM
Big Bene, on 26 March 2017 - 07:32 AM, said:
The code you posted above links to Shadow Warrior, not DN3D. I downloaded it anyway, thanks a lot.
Does it contain the build editor? Is there a reason you didn't point to Duke?
Oops, try this one.
HQ3C-DTNH-NCAR-JEBU
#27 Posted 27 March 2017 - 12:10 AM
I still think there's absolutely zero reason to use anything other than Mapster32 to create levels for any of the BUILD engine games, though.
#28 Posted 27 March 2017 - 12:33 AM
Daedolon, on 27 March 2017 - 12:10 AM, said:
Except maybe for game specific things M32 doesn't support , it is a DN3D editor.
For SW a lot of effects aren't supported, and things like driveable vehicule won't work correctly if you make them using M32.
#29 Posted 27 March 2017 - 12:47 AM
#30 Posted 27 March 2017 - 05:55 AM
Daedolon, on 27 March 2017 - 12:47 AM, said:
That reminds me of this one SW map that was basically Red Light District retextured. Nice concept, but retexturing was all they did with no apparent concern for scale! Biggest Wang you'd ever see.