Buying new video card soon. "What's todays best value card?"
#1 Posted 24 March 2014 - 07:41 AM
So far I think I'm going for Nividia's GTX650-E-1GD5 from ASUS at Walmart for $144.
Anyone have any other suggestions?
#2 Posted 24 March 2014 - 09:08 AM
#3 Posted 24 March 2014 - 09:41 AM
Added:
They have a 2GB version of the same card, probably going with it, 20 bucks more.
This post has been edited by Drek: 24 March 2014 - 11:49 AM
#4 Posted 24 March 2014 - 06:57 PM
1GB video memory 192 bit card is better than a 2GB 128 bit card
i don't know what the exchange rate is, but something from this page should do (i not recommending shopping from there, just the cards on the page):
http://www.newegg.co...=1&name=192-Bit
This post has been edited by Forge: 24 March 2014 - 07:01 PM
#6 Posted 18 May 2014 - 12:53 PM
Drek, on 24 March 2014 - 07:41 AM, said:
So far I think I'm going for Nividia's GTX650-E-1GD5 from ASUS at Walmart for $144.
Anyone have any other suggestions?
Isn't a 560ti better than a 650? I think it is. If you can find a 560 under $200 get it. If not then I guess you can either look for amd cards which usually pack more hadware for the buck than nvidia but also expect shitty traditional ati drivers to forever plague your experience and make your superior amd hardware perform vastly inferior to nvidia's hardware.
Later edit:
Yes, I was right, the 560ti is indeed much better than a 650
http://www.hwcompare...eforce-gtx-650/
This post has been edited by Mr.Deviance: 18 May 2014 - 12:57 PM
#7 Posted 18 May 2014 - 01:26 PM
like these:
http://www.gpureview...1=681&card2=641
http://www.hwcompare...rce-gtx-650-ti/
A 560ti will kill a run of the mill 650 (like the one mentioned in the O.P.)
's why i mentioned:
your lag is going to be with that 128 bit memory interface.
1GB video memory 192 bit card is better than a 2GB 128 bit card
He should get a 256 bit card, or at least a 192 bit.
#8 Posted 18 May 2014 - 01:36 PM
Mr.Deviance, on 18 May 2014 - 12:53 PM, said:
Horrible advice, my Radeon 6970 had better drivers than my current 770.
Nvidia is great if you like terrible compute performance. And no Mantle. The whole industry is going Radeon anyway. Who do you think is powering the next gen consoles? The only reason I bought Nvidia was because my power supply failed and took out my old card during the Radeon Litecoin shortage.
This post has been edited by Protected by Viper: 18 May 2014 - 01:48 PM
#9 Posted 18 May 2014 - 03:59 PM
Protected by Viper, on 18 May 2014 - 01:36 PM, said:
Mantle ain't shit. See also: Glide, S3 MeTaL, Rendition RRedline, PowerVR...
"MUH DRIVERS."
DirectX 12 should be solid, and OpenGL will follow.
#10 Posted 18 May 2014 - 06:45 PM
The biggest issue with those higher level API's like DirectX and OpenGL is that they rely on the CPU to make draw calls which is crazy resource intensive. Aside from Mantle there is no way to program directly to the metal. DX12 is an improvement but it isn't full access like Mantle is. My CPU is overclocked far enough that I wouldn't see much of a benefit from Mantle.
I just built my friend a nice ass PC with an i5-4670k and an R9-280x. It's a much nicer than piece of hardware than the 770 now that prices have (almost) stabilized again. $320, 1GB more VRAM than Nvidia and better all around performance...and it was a name brand (XFX).
My biggest complaint about Nvidia is that they are selling products based on their name, false brand loyalty, and then they are overpricing them. Like I said before they are inferior to Radeons in every way save for power consumption, and their dual GPU support is a bit better. They rely on the "OMG RADEON DRIVERZ SUCK" meme to push cards these days.
This post has been edited by Protected by Viper: 18 May 2014 - 06:58 PM
#13 Posted 19 May 2014 - 04:38 AM
#14 Posted 19 May 2014 - 05:22 AM
#15 Posted 19 May 2014 - 05:52 AM
Score:
1 for my wallet - 0 video card producers
So I never see lights in Duke or play ROTT2013. There are worse fates
#16 Posted 19 May 2014 - 07:54 AM
Protected by Viper, on 19 May 2014 - 05:22 AM, said:
my 650ti has OpenCL 1.1 CUDA as well as CUDA 3.0 support.
not tech savvy to know if it's the same thing or not
it's "off" by default, but can be "turned on"
at least GPU-Z is reporting it as available:full support after i "enabled" it
#17 Posted 25 May 2014 - 07:21 AM
I formatted the old HDD's, I get the pleasure of reinstalling Windows now.
#18 Posted 25 May 2014 - 11:39 AM
http://www.newegg.ca...N82E16814121714
#20 Posted 25 May 2014 - 12:06 PM
This post has been edited by Protected by Viper: 25 May 2014 - 12:07 PM
#21 Posted 26 July 2014 - 12:29 PM
More choices, I'm so torn. want more RAM. what do i do??
info, i got 2@1GB DDR2 ram sticks in my mobo, I want a new mobo but I'm not buying one. Maybe someday.
Anyways, should I buy 4GB shitty ram at 80 bucks and swap it out, or can I cheap out and buy 2GB for $40 and put it in beside my current 2 sticks.
^
Nevermind, my old RAM is really slow, 400mhz, and the new sticks are 800mhz, so I'm gonna go with a straight up replacement.
This post has been edited by Drek: 27 July 2014 - 11:09 AM
#23 Posted 28 July 2014 - 06:30 AM
It stays till the next big purchase, mobo & i7 & at least 8gb ddr3
Probably never happen, probably gonna build one from scratch, or buy new. This case is tuned and I literally have duct tape covering up broken off pieces, I like it.
This post has been edited by Drek: 28 July 2014 - 06:31 AM
#24 Posted 28 July 2014 - 07:26 AM
Also, your so called "old" ram, which is DDR2-800 (400MHz clock, 800 effective) is more than enough for that setup. A 3.0GHz Core 2 Duo will not be bottlenecked by DDR2, period.
Case in point, The Commander bought DDR3-2166 to run with a locked multiplier Ivy Bridge i7. He should have just burned his money. You don't need that shit unless you're running a Haswell at 4.5GHz+ on water cooling, and even then, you'd be better off with 1866.
This post has been edited by Protected by Viper: 28 July 2014 - 07:28 AM
#25 Posted 28 July 2014 - 08:31 AM
For the record, I'll say Polymer runs at a steady 60fps in the first episode with HRP, with those sometimes small lags seeing a new texture for the first time at the wrong moment, like a fire fight with lights all over.
#26 Posted 28 July 2014 - 08:34 AM
Holy shit...throw some fresh thermal gel on that bitch.
#27 Posted 28 July 2014 - 08:35 AM
now that I think about it, it may just be why she runs a little hot now, but ROTT is very very cpu intense.
This post has been edited by Drek: 28 July 2014 - 08:42 AM