Yatta, on Dec 25 2008, 12:28 AM, said:
1. Five active administrators
2. A group of people who donated money to the site
Because of that, I'm not the sole owner of this website and I should not, and therefore do not, have the last say on how every affair should be handled.
That being said, while I'm against bans in general, if the majority of our administrators and financial contributors are pushing for a ban or another form of extreme treatment, then the outcome will be out of my control.
Offtopic but anyway. While I do understand about administrators, I do not think the same about financial contributers. It is called "donation" for a reason. They aren't own the site or anything. They souldn't directly or indirectly impose their opinions as "financial contributors".
Well, maybe I'm too anal about word "donation" but there it is. I'm not a donator, though. So my opinion may be a biased towards them, but I think it's unfair from their side to demand(harsh word) something because they "donated".