#35
Posted 26 April 2013 - 04:29 PM
Well, having watched roughly 50% of every game "reviewed" I can honestly say that from what I've heard and seen:
- The very few factual statements that he makes are basically false. Saying something along the lines "Duke3D is released around the time of Unreal", how is early 1996 - late 1998 is beyond me.
- Nagging was already covered by every post on this topic, so yes. He nagged.
- Leaving out Duke Nukem: Manhattan Project for some inexplicable reason, but covering obscure handheld consoles
- Demonstrating lack of familiarity with Duke3D gameplay/secrets/basic routes. For example not jumping on the movie projector at first.
- Ripping on DN:F, that's just lazy
And I'm with Soap DX on this one, it's not a review, it shouldn't be called a review.
On a side note, I only found out about "IGSRJ" because of this topic. He's hilarious. I watched 2 duke reviews and I can't take them seriously, I laughed the entire time. Anyone talking using voice synthesizing software (while obviously being able to speak with his real voice) is just a very entertaining troll.
0