They say Rage totally failed the pc gamers.
#1 Posted 04 October 2011 - 11:22 AM
The game seems to have pretty much every single problem that a pc game can have, ranging from massive stuttering, mouse lags, completely broken sound, texture popping that can put to shame even the first versions of GTA4 for pc, terrible artifacts and the weirdest realtime graphics scaling system ever made for a game in the history of games, where all of your graphics including your textures will scale up or down in real time in favor of you having 60 fps at all time.
So if your windows decides to update while you play Rage, it will most likely cause rage to set itself to lowest settings for a few minutes and all in real time, without you even having a say in it.
Supposedly, the game is not meant to have graphics settings, it's made to be this live streamed self tuned, self aware piece of shit of some kind.
But this all smells like bull shit to me and at this point I am looking at John Carmack's first potential epic fail in his entire public career.
Many people are calling this the end of Id software's love for the pc gaming community.
I won't dramatize this and I will wait 1 week to see if patches and new drivers will fix these problems.
If shit will remain mostly unfixed after one week, I am going to lose a shitload of respect for id, respect that id managed earn in the course of 2 decades!
The following video seems to be a popular one at this hour and it's showing how bad it can get when playing it.
This post has been edited by Mr.Deviance: 04 October 2011 - 11:31 AM
#2 Posted 04 October 2011 - 11:36 AM
I'm not too much into great graphics, but mouse lags and stuttering really gets on my nerves. If you have so much time to do something, why not do it well?
I'm just confused by the lack of well made products these days...
Hope there'll be a patch or something. At least that's a quite fixable problem. Having not played it I can't say what else it's lacking than technology.
#3 Posted 04 October 2011 - 11:46 AM
Id was supposed to be one of the third strong pillars of pc gaming along with blizzard and valve.
When such an important company manages to fail on delivering a working game in such a monstrous way, I begin asking myself what future is there for me in gaming because I am definitely not going to give in and buy a console any time soon.
If pc gaming dies, the entire gaming world will die for me and I much rather quit gaming the day pc gaming dies, than continue my gaming hobby on next gen consoles.
I will forever refuse to play fps games with a gamepad.
This post has been edited by Mr.Deviance: 04 October 2011 - 11:51 AM
#4 Posted 04 October 2011 - 12:02 PM
This guys seems to be running it fine
EDIT: http://twitter.com/#...248985557118976
This post has been edited by Bam050196: 04 October 2011 - 12:09 PM
#5 Posted 04 October 2011 - 12:36 PM
Bam050196, on 04 October 2011 - 12:02 PM, said:
This guys seems to be running it fine
EDIT: http://twitter.com/#...248985557118976
Not sure if you noticed but that guy has hardware that's much above the official recommended requirements for this game and he is running the game at 1280x1024 only...
Core i7-2600K CPU @ 3.4 GHz with 8 GB of memory, and a GeForce GTX 580 graphics should not be required to max out a game with Rage's graphics, let alone to just be barely able to run it at such a low resolution as seen in that video.
If that guy needs a GTX 580 just for 1280x1024 then what do you need to play it in full hd?
Does anybody even give a shit a this point?
I also heard there is no mouse sensitivity option... This is crazy.
This post has been edited by Mr.Deviance: 04 October 2011 - 12:58 PM
#6 Posted 04 October 2011 - 01:25 PM
Here's my launch properties to make Rage function like a PC game and not a shitty console port:
+cvaradd g_fov 20 +set com_skipIntroVideo 1 +set com_allowConsole 1 +fc_maxcachememoryMB 1024 +ik_enablesmoothing 0 +image_usecompression 0 +jobs_numthreads 4 +mem_phymemblocksizem 3072 +m_smooth 0 +m_rawinput
#7 Posted 04 October 2011 - 01:34 PM
http://www.actiontri...PerfDriver.aspx
first notice from AMD for a fix - have not tested it, in fact I have not even bought the game
#8 Posted 04 October 2011 - 01:36 PM
Mad Max RW, on 04 October 2011 - 01:25 PM, said:
I haven't played RAGE yet so I can't comment on the specific opinions anyone has given so far, but this really cracked me up for some reason.
#9 Posted 04 October 2011 - 03:54 PM
For stupid people, I'm being facetious.
This post has been edited by Captain Awesome: 04 October 2011 - 03:54 PM
#10 Posted 04 October 2011 - 03:56 PM
#11 Posted 04 October 2011 - 08:12 PM
hahahahahahahaha look at that. 6 Critics give it 89 and 96 gamers a woooooping 3.4 the end of super titles??????????? All hail Hard Reset??
Mr. Deviance your post saved me $60 hard earned canada like dollars - cheers mate
#12 Posted 04 October 2011 - 09:14 PM
#13 Posted 04 October 2011 - 09:25 PM
#14 Posted 04 October 2011 - 10:23 PM
I did the stupid mistake of reading his twitter account in hopes that I will see him posting something about his experience with Rage and so I did, but please be warned that if you are an old school pc gamer, what follows next is something that will potentially make you hate George Broussard's fat guts forever as much as I hate him now!
First he said this on twitter:
Quote
Playing Rage. Bar none, the best looking game this generation. 60fps=bliss. Fun as hell, too.
http://twitter.com/#...410888552038400
Then a guy replied to him on twitter this:
Quote
@georgeb3dr best looking game this gen except on right 50% of screen when turning right, & left 50% of screen when turning left. No?
http://twitter.com/#...450295212523520
And what did the ungrateful, biggest failure of all, piece of shit George Broussard had to say to this?
Lo and behold !!!
Quote
@ClickNothing I dunno. 360 has nope of the issues you speak of. If you're on PC, then, it's your fault!
http://twitter.com/#...450719856435200
George Broussard is not only officially and irrecoverably DEAD for me after this tweet coupled with his previous pro console/hate pc remarks that he made about DNF's control scheme but if I will actually stumble into him during the course of my life, I will personally take time to spit him right between his fat eyes!
This post has been edited by Mr.Deviance: 04 October 2011 - 10:35 PM
#15 Posted 04 October 2011 - 11:13 PM
#16 Posted 04 October 2011 - 11:18 PM
Bam050196, on 04 October 2011 - 12:02 PM, said:
This guys seems to be running it fine
EDIT: http://twitter.com/#...248985557118976
Fine? besides the fact shadows and darkened areas are green, which I heard is another problem.
Edit: wow supposedly this is actually intended by the developers, looks like shit.
This post has been edited by ozz: 04 October 2011 - 11:28 PM
#17 Posted 05 October 2011 - 03:46 AM
DeeperThought, on 04 October 2011 - 09:25 PM, said:
... or tweaking the game video display via the console?
http://www.gamepur.c...l-settings.html
Nah, right now the Metacritic's score for PC dropped by half a point each, critic and user. I'm back at work, full time, and at the looks of it just in time. No time to tweak the console so a PC game looks like a PS3 game, and that for $60.
@ Mr. Deviance - lol, what did you expect? He is into console games for a while now, and so is John C. of the looks of it. Fuck them both.
This post has been edited by Hank: 05 October 2011 - 03:49 AM
#18 Posted 05 October 2011 - 04:53 AM
Hank, on 05 October 2011 - 03:46 AM, said:
http://www.gamepur.c...l-settings.html
Nah, right now the Metacritic's score for PC dropped by half a point each, critic and user. I'm back at work, full time, and at the looks of it just in time. No time to tweak the console so a PC game looks like a PS3 game, and that for $60.
@ Mr. Deviance - lol, what did you expect? He is into console games for a while now, and so is John C. of the looks of it. Fuck them both.
John Carmack can't be compared with George Broussard at any level.
John Carmack has proven himself through his own work many times in the last decade wile George Broussard is just credited with being there when Duke3d came out.
George Broussard has yet to prove himself with something.
This post has been edited by Mr.Deviance: 05 October 2011 - 04:54 AM
#19 Posted 05 October 2011 - 05:29 AM
Things I do like how shooting will affect how the enemies animate dynamically and use the environment to their advantage, they react to whatever weapon your holding, and if you are using chunkier ammo they also become more intimidated and sometimes fearful i still wouldn't call that really original and unique to game GTA4 did this rather well but its good to see this element being used by others. The sound is great too if you have surround, its not super bad shit game, its just unless its starts to become a bit more varied it will be another game i get bored with and probably wont finish, will be interesting to hear what Yahtzee has to say about this one.
#20 Posted 05 October 2011 - 05:38 AM
However, Borderlands is way more bang for your buck. If you want to run around a big expansive wasteland killing badguys with your friends without caring about story then Borderlands is the clear choice. Rage is Doom 3 meets Fallout.
The only thing that can possibly save Rage (if they manage to patch it in time for the millions of people feeling fucked over) is the mod community. There isn't enough game here to keep you talking about it for more than a month.
#21 Posted 05 October 2011 - 08:27 AM
This post has been edited by Mr.Deviance: 05 October 2011 - 08:30 AM
#22 Posted 05 October 2011 - 08:53 AM
Well that explains what they were doing instead of optimizing the game for PC's.
#23 Posted 05 October 2011 - 09:33 AM
Mad Max RW, on 05 October 2011 - 08:53 AM, said:
Well that explains what they were doing instead of optimizing the game for PC's.
You didn't discover that wow thing. The picture you posted is from the steam powered forums.
I've already seen it and it's a bit lame to speculate so far.
They could be empty boxes or what ever.
Just because 1 or 2 people there might play wow in the launch break, doesn't mean they all do.
I can assure you that Carmack does not play wow.
#24 Posted 05 October 2011 - 09:42 AM
Do you think I believe they literally spent all their time playing Warcraft? It's a goddamn joke. How can people be so thick. Oh yeah, internet.
This post has been edited by Mad Max RW: 05 October 2011 - 09:43 AM
#25 Posted 05 October 2011 - 11:16 AM
This is by far, the worst PC port in history. I will not be buying this .
This post has been edited by Descent: 05 October 2011 - 11:16 AM
#26 Posted 05 October 2011 - 01:41 PM
The only thing bad about this game are these graphical problems. I have no problems myself, but so many people are discrediting the entire game because of some severely overlooked problems.
#27 Posted 05 October 2011 - 01:52 PM
Mr.Deviance, on 05 October 2011 - 04:53 AM, said:
John Carmack has proven himself through his own work many times in the last decade wile George Broussard is just credited with being there when Duke3d came out.
George Broussard has yet to prove himself with something.
Where did I compare the two?
Yet, this game will need to wait until the patches are in and the Steam forums give the green light, sort of speak.
Apparently the AI is noteworthy, rumours of texture packs floating around, thus hope, for now - no thanks.
@ Descent. Explain.
This post has been edited by Hank: 05 October 2011 - 02:52 PM
#28 Posted 05 October 2011 - 02:53 PM
#29 Posted 05 October 2011 - 03:24 PM
This post has been edited by Captain Awesome: 05 October 2011 - 03:24 PM
#30 Posted 05 October 2011 - 05:41 PM
Mr.Deviance, on 05 October 2011 - 08:27 AM, said:
The only thing wrong is that texture resolution is rather low and some buildings are different
Its also at a slightly different angle, so it appears as if some stuff is missing, but its just in a different spot.
In fact the textures are so low that I'm sure the player either very quickly turned to get that angle so the textures aren't fully streamed in yet, or the graphics are automatically set to low. Because it doesn't look that bad in game.
This post has been edited by ThePinkus: 05 October 2011 - 05:42 PM