TX, on 10 October 2011 - 10:53 AM, said:
My point is that low res textures don't make it a bad game, for the same reason that I can load up any number of old DOS games and enjoy them immensely regardless of their lack of high resolution art assets.
That's not how it works for others like me for ex.
I too can load shitloads of dos games or any retro game from any platform for that matter and love them very much precisely for their pixelated low res graphics.
The problem with today's games is that I don't expect to like them for the same reasons for which I like old games but for the reasons for which I like
D old games when they were new.
I don't like a game that looks shitty when that game just got released and it's supposed to be a state of the art fps game that should immerse me with it's graphics and ambient.
The reason why I can play hl1 today or duke3d or doom and still love them, is because back when I played them, they were state of the art games and now when I play them, I still see them as having state of the art graphics but from a different age that I lived and enjoyed. When I play a game that used to be state of the art, I get teleported to those days and that's what nostalgia is!
How can I ever have nostalgia for Rage, 10 years from now just like I have for doom 1 and quake, when Rage looks consolized and low res even today when it's supposed to impress me?