[N64]

http://www.lensoftru...hot-comparison/

[MusicallyInspired]

Hmmm interesting. It seems that the PS3 version has better player character textures, while the 360 version has better world textures (or less blurry world textures anyway), judging from the last two screenshots on the second page. Any other differences seem to be in more or less bloom (360 has more) and overall game contrast (360 has darker contrast, which it usually does).

But how are the load times compared to each other? And framerate?

[HBx2000]

MusicallyInspired, on 16 June 2011 - 06:41 AM, said:

But how are the load times compared to each other? And framerate?

Maybe you find here some answers: http://www.eurogamer...orever-face-off

[Martin]

HBx2000, on 16 June 2011 - 07:45 AM, said:

Maybe you find here some answers: http://www.eurogamer...orever-face-off

^This. Digital Foundry are miles better than LoT. Long one short - PS3 version comes out on top. It has better shadows, more consistent framerate, far less screen-tear (almost none, whereas 360 has a ton of it, nearly all the time). There's nothing about the 360 version that is better, except maybe the fact that you don't have to install on 360. For the person who asked about load times, I watched the Giant Bomb review of DNF, and they were running the 360 version installed. Load times seemed about the same (i.e. very long!).

[Come On And Slam]

Aren't these two consoles exactly the same, but one has full motion control or something? I've also heard that Nintendo is filing lawsuit on Sony.

[Kathy]

Cool story, bro.

[Person of Color]

NECROPOST!!!!

[Kathy]

What the fuck! Shit, isn't it better to just kill yourself? Even after watching South Park episode I never thought the syndrome could be this bad.