Burnett, on 31 October 2012 - 06:29 PM, said:
Then you should have gone to other educational facility where they don't teach much of a theoretical stuff, but more a practical one. I'm sure you have those. But if you want to be educated in mathematics then you need to understand how people proved stuff they theorised. It teaches you to think.
Better late than never. The university I'm currently going to is the and best and most highly regarded in my city that isn't some outrageously expensive private uni. Basically if I wanted to go to another facility it would be a downgrade, even if they did teach more practical things. The reason why I say it's bloated, is because everyone has to do the same maths as the pure maths students in first year, regardless of your degree. Next year we split up, and I start doing "engineering maths". I've looked up the course outline, and literally HALF of the content from this year doesn't carry onto next year in the slightest. I can understand them wanting to give everyone a good background, but it sucks in terms of efficiency of education.
Btw, having to study for 25 years only to work for about 30 years then retire and contribute nothing for the rest of your life is a huge waste. I mean if education systems went about it smartly they could probably shave off 10 years. IMO I would love it if they started streaming people into different classes based on their ability in various subjects from maybe a little before high school, because everyone has different strengths and weaknesses, and having to teach a compromise between all those strengths and weaknesses in every class is slowing
everyone down: those who have the capacity to learn that particular subject much faster, and those who would never choose or continue that subject and hence are wasting a lot of time being forced to do it.