Micki!, on Apr 22 2007, 03:22 PM, said:
Welcome to the Forums then Peoplessi
And enjoy your stay...
Doesn't the 6800 series support SM 3.0..? (i can't remember) and in that case, wouldn't these cards be among minimum requirements as well..? (can't speak for Radeon Cards, i'm not very familiar with thier numbers)
"Doesn't the 6800 series support SM 3.0..?"
Yes indeed they do, in fact the Geforce 6 series where the first cards to support SM3.0.
"and in that case, wouldn't these cards be among minimum requirements as well..?"
Yes indeed, certainly the minimum to even run the game, if that(SM3.0 support) was the requirement. If the Geforce 6 series would be able to get decent performance on low settings then they would indeed be the minimum requirement.
"(can't speak for Radeon Cards, i'm not very familiar with thier numbers)"
Well the Radeon equivalent of the Geforce 6800 series is the Radeon 800/850 series. However those card only support SM2.0b shaders and not SM3.0 shaders, so if the game is going to require SM3.0, the game will simply refuse to run on those. However the Radeon X1k series(the ATI equivalent of the Geforce 7 series) DOES support SM3.0.
So if I am correct in assuming a SM3.0 requirement, then these are the cards(I won't bother listing stuff like GT, Ultra, LE, etc, way to many combinations) that it will run on, but that doesn't guarantee even anything above 0 FPS(WIkipedia is the source of this info):
Nvidia:
*Geforce 6100 (series?) (there just is no way a card can run a game like that in any way shape of form at all basically)
*Geforce 6200 series (again the same basically applies, very weak budget card).
*Geforce 6500 series(shaky card, quite unlikely).
*Geforce 6600 series(starting look better, wouldn't be all THAT surprised if the on the box listed minimum requirement will be a card from this series)
*Geforce 6800 series(Could probably be the minimum requirement card, I just can't see the minimum requirement being higher than that)
*Geforce 7100 series(Have no idea about this cards)
*Geforce 7300 series(the same as above)
*Geforce 7500 series(again the same comment holds)
*Geforce 7600 series(The mid range series, could quite possible see something like this running the game at medium settings with low resolutions and no AA(if the game even supports AA))
*Geforce 7800 series(the initial GF7 series released).
*Geforce 7900 series(George mentioned a GF7950 in
this now famous post)
*Geforce 8500 series
*Geforce 8600 series
*Geforce 8800 series(The most advanced series out there, also mentioned in the famous
post)
ATI(Can't be bothered with comments, or else this post won't ever be submitted, the lowest two are budget ones, might very well be exluded from even running DNF atleast any where near decently, AFAIK, but don't quote me on that):
*Radeon X1050
*Radeon X1300
*Radeon X1400
*Radeon X1550
*Radeon X1600
*Radeon X1650
*Radeon X1700
*Radeon X1800(My laptop)
*Radeon X1900(Mentioned by George in the
post)
*The
R600 based cards.
Given these lists does this make you guys think they will require SM3.0 or not ? Why/why not ?
Is there anything you guys disagree with me on with regards to the descriptions of these cards ? Anything I left of, didn't know about or should have mentioned ?
Edit:
"I won't be able to run it decently, it's that simple
"
Actually if I am reading George correctly you won't be able to run it at all:
Quote
Multi-core support is in and quite nice. We all run Core Duo 6600's and 7950/8800, ati 1900 level cards.
Multi-core is the future and the game is pretty much going to require it. You really have to, to make a game competitive with modern consoles, or beyond. One cpu isn't enough anymore.
64 bit will come, but is lower priorty. Vista/64 bit isn't a priority for us at the moment.
Peoplessi, perhaps they will provide a DX10 render path, but I am a bit concerned that would delay them and/or hinder work flow.
Edit2:
As far as not running on a GF6800, goes here is the previous quote on what machines they where running:
Quote
3-3.4ghz, 6800g's, with 2 gigs of ram. Pretty average around here. Some higher and some lower, but not by much (2.8ghz and a 9800 Pro).
- George Borussard, January 9th, 2006.
It is hard for me to imagine all of a sudden cutting out a card like that, but then again it is also pretty hard for me to imagine going form likely not supporting dual core to [b]requring[b] it and that certainly seems to be the case.
Have you got any ideas about how that change might have come about peoplessi ?