Duke Nukem 3D: Atomic Reload "New sprite replacements for characters/weapons. Contains NSFW images."
#61 Posted 09 July 2010 - 08:29 PM
-----------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.youtube.c...h?v=q3VYFKLCdcQ
*note may still be processing.
This post has been edited by Nfelli64: 09 July 2010 - 08:31 PM
#62 Posted 09 July 2010 - 10:29 PM
#63 Posted 10 July 2010 - 10:19 AM
#64 Posted 10 July 2010 - 10:36 AM
DISRUPTOR, on Jul 10 2010, 11:19 AM, said:
I give you Dukes new bacon.
pig_Pose_a.jpg
i already got my BBQ ready >!
#65 Posted 10 July 2010 - 10:55 AM
DISRUPTOR, on Jul 10 2010, 11:19 AM, said:
How about making the skin less shiny? Anyway, it's good. When I see that thing I definitely want to shoot it.
#66 Posted 10 July 2010 - 11:01 AM
DeeperThought, on Jul 10 2010, 11:55 AM, said:
It's more shaded than shiney i think
BTW did you get Nfelli64's PM?
#67 Posted 10 July 2010 - 12:03 PM
DISRUPTOR, on Jul 10 2010, 11:19 AM, said:
I give you Dukes new bacon.
pig_Pose_a.jpg
Damn, its just AWESOME 8-)
#68 Posted 10 July 2010 - 12:06 PM
Atlas555, on Jul 10 2010, 01:03 PM, said:
Lol it looks like Beyond Good and Evil 2
#70 Posted 10 July 2010 - 03:14 PM
Here's some closeups of pig skin.
#71 Posted 10 July 2010 - 05:39 PM
#72 Posted 11 July 2010 - 11:14 AM
#73 Posted 11 July 2010 - 11:21 AM
HellFire, on Jul 11 2010, 12:14 PM, said:
yeah? Well it's better than what you can do pal!
#74 Posted 11 July 2010 - 01:36 PM
You obviously don't have experience modeling monsters, the model is obviously unfinished and you obviously don't care about taking criticism into consideration, so at this point I think crap is a very good description.
#75 Posted 11 July 2010 - 01:52 PM
#76 Posted 11 July 2010 - 02:10 PM
#77 Posted 11 July 2010 - 02:48 PM
TX, on Jul 11 2010, 02:36 PM, said:
You obviously don't have experience modeling monsters, the model is obviously unfinished and you obviously don't care about taking criticism into consideration, so at this point I think crap is a very good description.
Eduke dev or not TX your being a complete cunt.
Maybe you should know i have only been modeling for 3 or 4 months.
I get it. It's crap. But here's an idea, rather than just saying "oh this is crap" why not give me a decent list of changes to make? I said i wasn't making anymore changes because the criticism came with insults and ridicules.
#78 Posted 11 July 2010 - 02:52 PM
HellFire, on Jul 12 2010, 07:14 AM, said:
DISRUPTOR, on Jul 12 2010, 07:21 AM, said:
Now you are asking for opinions and things to change, you
If you really can't handle people having an opinion of your mod then you should not even have a forum for it and only post the FINAL product then be gone.
This post has been edited by The Commander: 11 July 2010 - 02:57 PM
#79 Posted 11 July 2010 - 03:01 PM
DISRUPTOR, on Jul 11 2010, 03:48 PM, said:
Maybe you should know i have only been modeling for 3 or 4 months.
I get it. It's crap. But here's an idea, rather than just saying "oh this is crap" why not give me a decent list of changes to make? I said i wasn't making anymore changes because the criticism came with insults and ridicules.
That's funny, I could have sworn I saw people telling you the shape of the head was wrong, et cetera, to which you pretty much made excuses for it looking like that and told them to fuck off because you weren't going to fix it. The head and the neck are definitely the areas that need the most work, so you should start there.
Speaking of experience, I learned C by coding EDuke32, and you certainly didn't see me telling people their bug reports were invalid when I released something 4 months after starting just because the reports came from non-programmers who couldn't do any better. It doesn't work like that.
#80 Posted 11 July 2010 - 03:05 PM
TX, on Jul 11 2010, 04:01 PM, said:
Wow your pretty stupid for a programmer. There is NO right or wrong. The pigs look different in all the Duke games. or did you miss that?
And i refuse to be the subject of abuse here. Blackwell already said if you don't like the mod don't post.
Oh and your "C" example IS invalid. You can not compare artistic preference with Coding.
#81 Posted 11 July 2010 - 03:20 PM
#82 Posted 11 July 2010 - 03:24 PM
Lets not make this locked shall we?
Give criticism. Thats ok.
@commander
calling someone a retard is childish.
even calling someone a woman is childish.
@DISRUPTOR please take criticism lightly. You don't have to go as far to call TX a cunt.
now with all respect, can we have some nice criticism on the model.
What should be changed?
What should be changed edited?
#83 Posted 11 July 2010 - 03:26 PM
You forget that I also warned you yourself that you would have to be able to take criticism. You should be able to respond with well thought out posts.
Frankly your response could have simply been, "For this mod, I prefer this style. I may make small changes but it's going to stay similar to this." Instead you question another person's ability.
TerminX didn't say anything dickish until you called him a cunt. After that he's perfectly justified in responding similarly (which he didn't because he's smarter than that). If it happens again the thread will be locked and you will have warnings on your account.
Edit: Nevermind, TX beat me to it. Have fun!
This post has been edited by Mblackwell: 11 July 2010 - 03:27 PM
#84 Posted 11 July 2010 - 03:51 PM
That's my opinion, I have a right to voice it without any consequences.
#85 Posted 11 July 2010 - 03:56 PM
Disruptor tends to be a bit hostile, and he was. Thats bullshit. Especially when some of us like just about everything else but one element of the pig mesh. No need to start acting like you're the Jesus Christ on the Cross when you're not.
But I dont think having his crap full stopped was the way to go either.
Meh.
#86 Posted 11 July 2010 - 04:00 PM
Disruptor has a right to make whatever kind of mod he likes, wether other people like it or not, I admit he snaps easily, but everybody here is aware of this. If you jump in someones thread with such an attitude they will naturally defend themselves and with Disruptors temper you're going to get back as much as you give if not more, as far as I am aware he hasn't really broken any rules as such and if he has they are ones that are not usually enforced. I feel the ban is highly unfair. If you ask me Disruptor isn't the only guy around here that needs to think about anger management.
If you are going on a banning spree, it looks like you'll have to boot me off as well and then probably others, and I can't see that as something you would want to do because then who would visit the forums?
This post has been edited by High Treason: 11 July 2010 - 04:01 PM
#87 Posted 11 July 2010 - 04:05 PM
He has only been suspended from posting for a week, people like HellFire for example have come into this thread with good criticism and have had it thrown back in their face by Disruptor.
People said I couldn't take criticism with anything that I worked on, but this guy surely does take the cake as I didn't reply with something along the basic lines of "You don't like it, Fuck off then cos I aint changing it"
Which is exactly what is going on here.
This post has been edited by The Commander: 11 July 2010 - 04:10 PM
#88 Posted 11 July 2010 - 04:15 PM
All you guys fucking do is argue here seriously get it to msn or PM and let the topic be its called atomic reload not atomic argue seriously
#89 Posted 11 July 2010 - 04:16 PM
You guys can keep up with running around like a bunch of headless chickens and crying about things that never happened if you want to though. Yes, clearly I'm on a banning spree--I'm up to 0 users already--and clearly I've shut down this project for good by making no effort to lock the thread or halt discussion on the matter. Get a grip on reality and quit acting like you just got hit in the head with a big chunk of falling sky.