3DR-T2 Lawsuit settled "Finally its Over!!!!!"
#31 Posted 11 June 2010 - 04:50 PM
Nobody really knows what this means, but given the fact that nobody at 3D Realms is celebrating, there is kind of reason for concern.
This isn't GREAT news, but it's good news.
#33 Posted 11 June 2010 - 07:02 PM
Just a big publicity stunt on both parts to get free advertising IMO.
#34 Posted 11 June 2010 - 07:05 PM
#35 Posted 11 June 2010 - 07:35 PM
chips on their shoulders in here as well?
#37 Posted 11 June 2010 - 07:59 PM
Mack, on Jun 11 2010, 02:34 PM, said:
Hmm, let's see...
A game company that promises greatness and then can't deliver, but enjoys the slavish devotion of clueless morons. Spends money it can't afford and then has nothing to show for it except unemployed workers.
A President who promises greatness and then can't deliver, but enjoys the slavish devotion of clueless morons. Spends trillions in deficit spending on a "stimulus" and other crap and has nothing to show for it except millions of unemployed workers.
Yes, I think your poster is perfectly apt.
This post has been edited by DeeperThought: 11 June 2010 - 08:05 PM
#38 Posted 11 June 2010 - 08:19 PM
If it has that kind of stupid protection, I will never buy it. Else count me in, I will buy it the first day it will be out.
#39 Posted 11 June 2010 - 08:22 PM
I think 1 of the 2 scenarios below is most likely similiar to how this got resolved.
Scenario 1:
3drealms was able to "buy out" of their contractual obligations to Take 2 regarding the game. IE: Take 2 no longer
has the rights to produce/publish the game.
But what about the money or lack thereof Kaiser?
-Let's say a company like Microsoft came in and said "George, Scott, we'll give you x amount of dollars, we'll take over the publishing
rights for the game and pay off Take 2 to make them walk away. In return, DNF will be an Xbox exclusive release. However, you will retain
ownership of the Duke IP." 3drealms then contacted another external developer to complete the game.
Why do I think this is possible? George and Scott's feelings regarding Take 2 are well established. From George telling Take 2 to
"stfu" and Scott openly lobbying for EA to buy Take 2, it's apparent there was no love lost between the parties. Especially 3drealms
who mentioned that they never lose lawsuits and never settle.
This is probably the scenario that makes most sense. 3drealms is happy they retain ownership of the IP and get Take 2 out of the picture
completely. Take 2 is happy to just get a paycheck for what they felt they were "owed".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Scenario 2:
-3drealms found an external developer who was willing to work on the game pro bono and take payment after the game ships.
They took this information to Take 2 with solid dates for completion(if not already done) and Take 2 settled. Cash really is king
and 3drealms and Take 2 are friends again.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
I don't believe it's wishful thinking to expect some type of news/announcement regarding Duke Nukem Forever at E3. The timing
is highly suspect and now that the news is "out there" right before the world's biggest video game expo, it's surely going to be
one of the most talked about/sought after news stories during E3 imo.
Stay Tuned? Indeed.
#40 Posted 11 June 2010 - 08:22 PM
Companys like EA spend millions on that shit now just for it to be cracked within 3 days of release.
*cough cough C&C 4*
This post has been edited by The Commander: 11 June 2010 - 08:23 PM
#41 Posted 11 June 2010 - 08:42 PM
#42 Posted 11 June 2010 - 09:04 PM
DeeperThought, on Jun 11 2010, 11:59 PM, said:
A game company that promises greatness and then can't deliver, but enjoys the slavish devotion of clueless morons. Spends money it can't afford and then has nothing to show for it except unemployed workers.
A President who promises greatness and then can't deliver, but enjoys the slavish devotion of clueless morons. Spends trillions in deficit spending on a "stimulus" and other crap and has nothing to show for it except millions of unemployed workers.
Yes, I think your poster is perfectly apt.
This is suppose to be a happy thread, be positive!
#43 Posted 11 June 2010 - 09:26 PM
ReaperMan, on Jun 11 2010, 10:04 PM, said:
I am happy. Being happy and being positive are not the same thing.
#44 Posted 11 June 2010 - 09:29 PM
DeeperThought, on Jun 12 2010, 01:26 AM, said:
True, but being positive makes people happy. http://forums2.duke4...tyle_emoticons/default/smile.gif
#45 Posted 11 June 2010 - 09:50 PM
#46 Posted 11 June 2010 - 09:58 PM
#48 Posted 11 June 2010 - 10:51 PM
"Hey, the lawsuit is settled, now the way is clear for some kind of Duke development" to complete religious mania that that the game is going to magically hit the shelves over the weekend.
This post has been edited by Tea Monster: 11 June 2010 - 10:52 PM
#49 Posted 12 June 2010 - 12:23 AM
Tea Monster, on Jun 12 2010, 08:51 AM, said:
"Hey, the lawsuit is settled, now the way is clear for some kind of Duke development" to complete religious mania that that the game is going to magically hit the shelves over the weekend.
remember Take 2 was denied to hold the development on DNF and 3DR stating to continue the development on DNF.
#50 Posted 12 June 2010 - 12:58 AM
Jobi-Wan Kenobi, on Jun 12 2010, 04:23 AM, said:
And we can assume development has been going on at least since that comment made by Jon St. John at MagFest, probably even before that, but at least that long. I bet he's been hard at work voicing for the game at last!
I think it took the voice actor of Niko Bellic in GTA4 about 9 months to complete his voice work. DNF probably won't have that much voicing to do, plus the Niko Bellic voice actor had to learn to speak with a Russian accent at first which probably delayed things. Jon St. John already has the voice, so he can get it done quick.
This post has been edited by NUKEMDAVE: 12 June 2010 - 01:06 AM
#51 Posted 12 June 2010 - 01:14 AM
The Commander, on Jun 12 2010, 09:30 AM, said:
Like magic the lawsuit ends days before E3. Not that it's going to be at E3, but still suspicious.
It's nice that it's over at least, the drama has ended for this chapter. If it ever does get released GB should write a book about the saga of DNF, it's got enough twists, turns, and such to make it a best selling book!
#54 Posted 12 June 2010 - 07:48 AM
DeeperThought, on Jun 11 2010, 10:59 PM, said:
A game company that promises greatness and then can't deliver, but enjoys the slavish devotion of clueless morons. Spends money it can't afford and then has nothing to show for it except unemployed workers.
A President who promises greatness and then can't deliver, but enjoys the slavish devotion of clueless morons. Spends trillions in deficit spending on a "stimulus" and other crap and has nothing to show for it except millions of unemployed workers.
Yes, I think your poster is perfectly apt.
I love you.
#55 Posted 12 June 2010 - 08:22 AM
kaisersoze, on Jun 12 2010, 12:22 AM, said:
chips on their shoulders in here as well?
Ouch!
Quote
rights for the game and pay off Take 2 to make them walk away. In return, DNF will be an Xbox exclusive release. However, you will retain
ownership of the Duke IP." 3drealms then contacted another external developer to complete the game.
That would be my guess as well. Might also explain the origins of the "IP being sold" rumor you posted (and refused to reveal sources of, I might add )
If this were true, I'd hope it's NOT Microsoft, as that more or less guarantees the PC version will be dropped.
Of course, all this is assuming we're not going to be waiting another 13 years, which is probably closer to the truth, actually.
#56 Posted 12 June 2010 - 08:33 AM
#58 Posted 12 June 2010 - 04:23 PM
crunchysuperman, on Jun 12 2010, 08:22 AM, said:
If this were true, I'd hope it's NOT Microsoft, as that more or less guarantees the PC version will be dropped.
Of course, all this is assuming we're not going to be waiting another 13 years, which is probably closer to the truth, actually.
Sounds likely.. although they seem to me to be having renewed interest in GFWL lately and are bringing Fable III to the PC. But I wouldn't put it past them to can the PC version after seeing what they did to other games like Alan Wake. Then they would drop excuses like:
"Some games are more suited for the intimacy of the PC, and others are best played from the couch in front of a larger TV screen. We ultimately realised that the most compelling way to experience "Duke Nukem Forever" was on the Xbox 360 platform, so we focused on making it an Xbox 360 exclusive. Both Microsoft and 3D Realms have long histories in PC game development. This decision was about matching this specific game to the right platform."
Either way it would rule out versions for non-microsoft systems pretty much. So I too hope that's not the case. However I also think it's also too early to start celebrating until we get some hard facts on the settlement. My excitement hasn't changed one bit over how it has been for the past ten years and that is very cautiously optimistic. Doing otherwise I feel would be opening myself up to being burned when the game doesn't de-vaporize anytime soon.
This post has been edited by Tetsuo: 12 June 2010 - 04:23 PM
#59 Posted 13 June 2010 - 08:27 AM
Quote
Keep in mind, Duke Begins being put on hold was something that was never confirmed, it was something 3DR said they had reasons to believe in their countersuit, Take Two outright denied putting Duke Begins on hold. But even if they did, that might have changed as a result of this settlement(remember 3DR claimed that Take Two was breaking their contract by delaying Duke Begins in any way) or perhaps as a result of 3DR counter-suing them for delaying Duke Begins. Think about it, if they put Duke Begins back on track that would certainly weaken that claim in 3DR's counter-suit.
Edit:
Found the other quote I was alluding to above:
Quote