[Steve 64]

I tried to read the other forum yesterday something to do with John St Jon but for some odd reason I need permission to read it, why is it lock for me and what happen this time?.

Edit: Nevermind I found out about it by searching Twitter, what I have to say about that is He a sick Man that all I have to say.

[Jimmy]

It looks like one of the mods is protecting JSJ and his affinity for child rape.

[Radar]

[Hendricks266]

Go back to ResetEra.

[Ninety-Six]

I feel like I'm missing context for that image.

[gemeaux333]

This boy is a killer, and he is shooting black peoples in demonstrations (from what I could gather)

[Balls of Steel Forever]

Ninety-Six, on 30 August 2020 - 08:54 PM, said:

I feel like I'm missing context for that image.

That is Kyle Rittenhouse

He was 17 and went to a protest with a firearm
Being 17 in the state of Wisconsin in the U.S.A. means that firearm was unlawfully possessed

3 people attacked him at the protest
2 died
1 was injured
All were shot fairly clearly in self defense

Here's a fairly in depth article

So, you can gauge for yourself

and my opinion

The Overman, on 29 August 2020 - 01:53 PM, said:

But honestly If I was in shoes
and I used a gun to kill 3 people that I didn't have the legal ability to possess
no matter what scenario
besides like finding a gun on the floor near me to defend myself

I would expect them to tack on reckless endangerment laws
That use of an unlawfully possessed firearm even for self defense
would imply reckless endangerment

but nonetheless it's not up to me and up to the court.

yes he didn't kill 3 people,
he killed 2 and injured another,
I say that previously in the thread,
I say it previously in this post

3 was because the injured other person
was put as a charge for attempted homicide
but I'm going to leave it
as it was to also convey that that number didn't matter

Spoiler

changed federal to state of Wisconsin
to stop misinformation

[Ninety-Six]

Thank you.

[Jimmy]

Nobody has less context than Gemeaux.

Also, Kyle was able to legally possess the gun because this is America. There are absolutely zero restrictions set out in the 2nd amendment. Any federal, state, municipal, or local laws contradicting the 2nd amendment are totally illegitimate.

[Balls of Steel Forever]

Jimmy, on 31 August 2020 - 12:15 AM, said:

Nobody has less context than Gemeaux.

Also, Kyle was able to legally possess the gun because this is America. There are absolutely zero restrictions set out in the 2nd amendment. Any federal, state, municipal, or local laws contradicting the 2nd amendment are totally illegitimate.

Again, we'll see what happens in court

Also apparently federal law doesn't have an age for possession of a long gun, so I was wrong.
Nonetheless it's still illegal under Wisconsin state law for a 17 year old to possess a firearm

I agree with your statement but that doesn't change the fact that I under the gun control act of 1968 cannot legally own or possess a firearm.
And would most likely get charged if I ever did so and the PoPo found out about it.

on gemeauxes opinion

gemeaux333, on 15 June 2020 - 08:28 AM, said:

although I don't say that kind of things everyday, I rather think wedlocks between cousins are much better than gay ones

As a bisexual, I'm happy he's on here
as this gets me to laugh way too often
whether or not it was his intention

[Fox]

Duke4.net is not going to be used to "cancel" Jon St. John.

He posted something on Twitter, and apologized. The end.

And the Duke Nukem General section is not the place to discuss the Kenosha shooting.