Merlijn, on 26 July 2020 - 12:33 PM, said:
Because there's a difference between it being a potentially decent thing to do... and enforcing it at the end of a gun which one must NEVER forget is the only thing ultimately backing up the authority of a government. The shared understanding that at the end of the line of a disagreement, government has permission to use a gun to make you comply to whatever is under their authority. They will look for every possible (cheaper, easier) avenue other than that to get your compliance, but once a government has taken it upon themselves to declare you *must* do something they are doing so with a gun to your head.
So everyone must consider the sort of culture and mindset of a government with that ability, and what it believes (and sufficient portion of the culture agrees) it should be dictating, if said government were to wind up in the hands of someone who despises you.
EDIT: Also, if I were the IP holder of a character, I'd be very uncomfortable letting one of my contractors have free reign to inject his personal politics and beliefs into antics acted out by my IP aimed more at maintaining his personal relevance, not necessarily the relevance of the IP. Perhaps he gets scripts approved though, dunno.