Offensive images in the frontpage.
#1 Posted 21 April 2011 - 05:17 PM
Today is the second time that an offensive image is posted in the FRONTPAGE. I don´t care about them -Christ! you should know the kind of things i watch when am alone!- and I am aware of what is all about the new shitty DNF, which i wont buy. But i come to this site to check the modding forums and would not like to set my browser to skip the frontpage just because the administrator can´t have a little of criteria when posting images. This, makes sense when you know that i browse forums and stuff usually with my kids around, or next to me watching what I do. So what happened today when my four years old boy asked what was that girl doing is the kind of situation I would like to avoid until they turn 13 or 14. I wish you could add a "spoiler" warning or something when sexually explicit images are going to be posted. It wont hurt anyone.
#2 Posted 21 April 2011 - 05:25 PM
Also, "shitty DNF"? Teh fuck are you on about?
#3 Posted 21 April 2011 - 05:52 PM
edit: last line removed, it was a bad idea considering i´m complaining about offensive stuff. So I should stay polite.
This post has been edited by Gambini: 21 April 2011 - 06:01 PM
#4 Posted 21 April 2011 - 06:14 PM
#5 Posted 21 April 2011 - 06:34 PM
Gambini, on 21 April 2011 - 05:52 PM, said:
I like the old trailer too, but at this point I'd just like to see the game released, and this looks better than a lot of the third party games, which were good in their own right. I'm happy just to see something new.
#6 Posted 21 April 2011 - 08:02 PM
#7 Posted 21 April 2011 - 08:11 PM
I appreciate your concern Gambini, but Duke4.net is really not a politically correct site. I'm sorry your 4 year old was exposed to an artist's rendition of bare breasts, but it's not anything more than you see in commercials on broadcast television in many parts of Europe. I personally think the widespread obsession with shielding our children from each and every questionable thing to appease our own desires to not have to endure an awkward situation and explain how things work in the adult world is a bit wrong. In this case, they're just body parts--it's not like some girl was being bent over and fucked or anything.
Just my two cents. Maybe I'll feel differently when my son is old enough to ask awkward questions, maybe not.
#8 Posted 21 April 2011 - 08:19 PM
Quote
She was standing. Half-naked.
What's the big deal? The pic isn't porn. So I don't think anyone should complain given the mature rating of DNF. It's fucking tits, not cunt. And there was no sex involved.
#9 Posted 21 April 2011 - 09:01 PM
#10 Posted 21 April 2011 - 09:42 PM
Thanks for your feedback and I'll take that into account for the future. My perspective is the same as Hank and TX but I know where you're coming from.
I can be out of control sometimes.
#11 Posted 21 April 2011 - 09:45 PM
And now, for some that hopefully the OP will find more appropriate... troll porn!
This post has been edited by wayskobfssae: 21 April 2011 - 09:47 PM
#13 Posted 22 April 2011 - 08:10 AM
Gambini, on 21 April 2011 - 05:17 PM, said:
Today is the second time that an offensive image is posted in the FRONTPAGE. I don´t care about them -Christ! you should know the kind of things i watch when am alone!- and I am aware of what is all about the new shitty DNF, which i wont buy.
STOP WHINING BITCH! GTFO!! You don't like it? THEN DON'T FUCKING LOOK AT THE DAMN IMAGE!!!
IF YOU KNOW THERE'S AN OFFENSIVE IMAGE ON THE HOMEPAGE DON'T GO ON IT!!!!!!
COMMON SENSE!!!!!!!!!!
IDIOT!!
NO SPOILER THING IS NEEDED!!! GTFO!!!!
If your worried about any potential children involved: DON'T BE SO DAMN PROTECTIVE!!
IT'S NOT REAL!! AND THERE GONNA BE EXPOSED TO IT ANY WAY AT SOME POINT!!!!!
Get over yourself!
This post has been edited by blackharted: 22 April 2011 - 08:12 AM
#14 Posted 22 April 2011 - 08:56 AM
blackharted, on 22 April 2011 - 08:10 AM, said:
IF YOU KNOW THERE'S AN OFFENSIVE IMAGE ON THE HOMEPAGE DON'T GO ON IT!!!!!!
COMMON SENSE!!!!!!!!!!
IDIOT!!
NO SPOILER THING IS NEEDED!!! GTFO!!!!
If your worried about any potential children involved: DON'T BE SO DAMN PROTECTIVE!!
IT'S NOT REAL!! AND THERE GONNA BE EXPOSED TO IT ANY WAY AT SOME POINT!!!!!
Get over yourself!
That's unacceptable. Come back tomorrow when you've woken up on the right side of the bed (and when your account can make posts again).
#15 Posted 22 April 2011 - 11:44 AM
TX, on 21 April 2011 - 08:11 PM, said:
Trust me, you will feel different (at least I hope so)
So in a way I can see where Gambini is coming from and TX, maybe just put some stars or some thing over it next time.
Or Gambini can invest in some sort of porn/image filtering addon.
#16 Posted 22 April 2011 - 01:28 PM
The Commander, on 22 April 2011 - 11:44 AM, said:
So in a way I can see where Gambini is coming from and TX, maybe just put some stars or some thing over it next time.
Or Gambini can invest in some sort of porn/image filtering addon.
Still seems kinda off to be whining about sexual content on a Duke site... What's he gonna do when he plays the actual game?
#17 Posted 22 April 2011 - 01:47 PM
wayskobfssae, on 22 April 2011 - 01:28 PM, said:
I wont. Duke Nukem wasn´t that much about porn and taking shit with the hands until Gearbox came into the scene. The Duke Nukem game I play (and the only reason of my presence in Duke forums) has a few 100 pixel tall dancer sprites that can not be labeled as sexual content.
#18 Posted 22 April 2011 - 02:06 PM
Besides, even the official DNF site has the "please verify your age (even though we know you will lie about this anyway)" page and then they maybe show tits. Let it be known, I have nothing against tits. I love tits. I had a lengthy argument with a fella defending tits. But tits on my computer screen while I'm at a public computer is not something I enjoy.
#19 Posted 22 April 2011 - 02:36 PM
Gambini, on 22 April 2011 - 01:47 PM, said:
Sorry, err... what?
Are you sure you played Duke 3D? Wasn't Super Mario or, I don't know... maybe Barbie?
PS: The image in the front page could be censored, yep, but you are talking too much bullshit here...
This post has been edited by LkMax: 22 April 2011 - 02:39 PM
#20 Posted 22 April 2011 - 03:35 PM
Quote
What´s being shown about DNF is a thousand times more obscene than what it was like in Duke3d times. Same case with the 2001 trailer, that image you posted is the only "dirty" thing in the trailer.
This post has been edited by Gambini: 22 April 2011 - 03:36 PM
#21 Posted 22 April 2011 - 03:51 PM
Gambini, on 22 April 2011 - 01:47 PM, said:
So outdated low resolution graphics means it can't be sexual content? Oh, that's a relief.
Oops.
This post has been edited by wayskobfssae: 22 April 2011 - 03:51 PM
#22 Posted 22 April 2011 - 03:52 PM
Gambini, on 22 April 2011 - 03:35 PM, said:
What´s being shown about DNF is a thousand times more obscene than what it was like in Duke3d times. Same case with the 2001 trailer, that image you posted is the only "dirty" thing in the trailer.
Right, a failed to understand your post... sure.
So you think Gearbox was making pure porn content instead of polishing the grafics and it wasn't executed or planned by 3D realms in the development... uhum.
And a woman with tits exposed and only wearing panties is only present in Duke Forever... oh, wait, what were the first and last images I posted? A woman with pans and topless? Oh, right.
Of course these images would be much more agressive if Duke3D were made today with the newest graphic engines avaible. Duke3D wasn't considered that obscene back in 1996?
#23 Posted 22 April 2011 - 03:55 PM
You boys are just picking a fight now. Gambini has a point and he is taking responsibility for his children; leave him alone and go lie about being 18 on a porn site.
This post has been edited by Mr.Flibble: 22 April 2011 - 03:56 PM
#24 Posted 22 April 2011 - 04:03 PM
Mr.Flibble, on 22 April 2011 - 03:55 PM, said:
You boys are just picking a fight now. Gambini has a point and he is taking responsibility for his children
He had a point until he started claiming DN3D is non-sexual in order to hide the hypocrisy.
#25 Posted 22 April 2011 - 04:14 PM
#26 Posted 22 April 2011 - 04:17 PM
Since Gambini is gone from this thread, I might as well warn everyone else who comes to these forums, if you're offended by sex and pixelated strippers aren't porn to you then fine, but don't ever play through all of DN3D... with the sound turned on.
This post has been edited by wayskobfssae: 22 April 2011 - 04:19 PM
#27 Posted 22 April 2011 - 05:57 PM
Mr.Flibble, on 22 April 2011 - 03:55 PM, said:
My main gripe is his "knowledge" that Gearbox is somehow responsible for over the top adult content. It's 3dRealms' game. GBX is just polishing, porting and adding mp. If you want to blame game creators - blame 3dr.
Quote
You're saying like you're way older than 18, mr. "grown-up".
#28 Posted 22 April 2011 - 07:28 PM
This post has been edited by Mr.Flibble: 22 April 2011 - 08:12 PM
#29 Posted 22 April 2011 - 07:34 PM
Lotan, on 22 April 2011 - 05:57 PM, said:
Anyone who says Duke3D was non-sexual is just lying through their teeth though. Or they're too young to realize there was a time when graphics were so simple that gamers had to use their imaginations to fill in the space between the pixels.
This post has been edited by wayskobfssae: 22 April 2011 - 07:35 PM