First ever black hole photo revealed
#1 Posted 10 April 2019 - 05:57 AM
https://www.cbc.ca/n...rcAiEfAWqnp-FgU
This post has been edited by MusicallyInspired: 10 April 2019 - 06:03 AM
#3 Posted 10 April 2019 - 08:15 AM
Black hole of the film Interstellar looks similar.
Must be why they said the movie has one of the most accurate blackhole design
#4 Posted 10 April 2019 - 09:09 AM
This post has been edited by MusicallyInspired: 10 April 2019 - 09:10 AM
#6 Posted 10 April 2019 - 09:14 AM
This post has been edited by MusicallyInspired: 10 April 2019 - 09:15 AM
#7 Posted 10 April 2019 - 10:29 AM
#8 Posted 10 April 2019 - 10:48 AM
Radar, on 10 April 2019 - 10:29 AM, said:
They mean visually accurate, is not like someone would depict spaghettification in a G or PG Hollywood movie anyway.
#9 Posted 10 April 2019 - 11:19 AM
#10 Posted 10 April 2019 - 11:27 AM
Mike Norvak, on 10 April 2019 - 10:48 AM, said:
Haha I know. It's a great movie with great visuals and sound work. But the narrative obviously has serious scientific flaws. Nolan had to be convinced out of writing a scene with light-speed travel at one point. (And for the record, it's rated PG13)
This post has been edited by Radar: 10 April 2019 - 11:35 AM
#11 Posted 10 April 2019 - 11:37 AM
While supermassive black holes wont cause spaghettification
#14 Posted 10 April 2019 - 01:58 PM
Photonic, on 10 April 2019 - 11:19 AM, said:
I see some obvious charge effects in that image. Where does charge fit into these equations?
What you're seeing is more likely to be the black hole spinning and material ejecting from the two poles.
#15 Posted 10 April 2019 - 02:18 PM
This post has been edited by Lazy Dog: 10 April 2019 - 02:19 PM
#16 Posted 10 April 2019 - 02:27 PM
Hendricks266, on 10 April 2019 - 01:58 PM, said:
potatoe potato
a quick quaternion review, what's further, us to the event horizon, or event horizon to center?
This post has been edited by Photonic: 10 April 2019 - 02:29 PM
#17 Posted 10 April 2019 - 03:07 PM
Zaxtor, on 10 April 2019 - 11:37 AM, said:
While supermassive black holes wont cause spaghettification.
Why is that?
#18 Posted 10 April 2019 - 03:23 PM
johnnythewolf, on 10 April 2019 - 03:07 PM, said:
because scientists like to sound smart when they don't really know.
This post has been edited by Forge: 10 April 2019 - 03:29 PM
#19 Posted 10 April 2019 - 03:27 PM
An admin has marked this post Terarded.
#20 Posted 10 April 2019 - 04:41 PM
Jimmy 100MPH, on 10 April 2019 - 03:27 PM, said:
*petabyte
1 petabyte per night x 2 weeks
maths is hard
This post has been edited by Forge: 10 April 2019 - 04:43 PM
#21 Posted 10 April 2019 - 04:50 PM
johnnythewolf, on 10 April 2019 - 03:07 PM, said:
well probably size and how far singularity is much closer to the Schwarzschild radius compare to the larger one (supermassive blackholes).
The point at which tidal forces destroy an object or kill a person will depend on the black hole's size. For a supermassive black hole, such as those found at a galaxy's center, this point lies within the event horizon, so an astronaut may cross the event horizon without noticing any squashing and pulling, although it remains only a matter of time, as once inside an event horizon, falling towards the center is inevitable. For small black holes whose Schwarzschild radius is much closer to the singularity, the tidal forces would kill even before the astronaut reaches the event horizon.
Also more on the black holes
#26 Posted 10 April 2019 - 07:22 PM
#27 Posted 10 April 2019 - 08:08 PM
#28 Posted 11 April 2019 - 04:48 AM
Though I suppose it could be a giant planet with humongous rings?
#29 Posted 11 April 2019 - 06:15 AM
#30 Posted 11 April 2019 - 11:25 AM
https://www.cnet.com...orning-commute/
MusicallyInspired, on 11 April 2019 - 04:48 AM, said:
This proves nothing.
Well not nothing, it reproves the current ignorance in physics.