Meh, it should be there....and it "aligns."
=================================
Links normally to be avoided
Except for a link to an official page of the article's subject,[5] one should generally avoid providing external links to:
Any site that does not provide a unique resource beyond what the article would contain if it became a featured article. In other words, the site should not merely repeat information that is already in the article.
SWC provides a shitonne more info and resources than the wiki article.
Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research, except to a limited extent in articles about the viewpoints that the site is presenting.
Nope.
Sites containing malware, malicious scripts, trojan exploits, or content that is illegal to access in the United States. Suspected malware sites can be reported by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Spam blacklist.
Nope, SWC is fresh and clean as a daisy.
Links mainly intended to promote a website, including online petitions. See Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming.
Individual web pages[6] that primarily exist to sell products or services, or to web pages with objectionable amounts of advertising. For example, the mobile phone article should not link to web pages that mostly promote or advertise cell-phone products or services.
SWC PROMOTES SHADOW WARRIOR.
Sites that require payment or registration to view the relevant content, unless the site itself is the subject of the article, or the link is a convenience link to a citation.[5] See § Sites requiring registration.
NOPE, SWC is FREE!
Sites that are inaccessible to a substantial number of users, such as sites that work only with a specific browser or in a specific country.
SWC even works on mobile browsers!
Direct links to documents that require external applications or plugins (such as Flash or Java) to view the content, unless the article is about such file formats. See § Rich media for more details.
Nope
Any search results pages, such as links to individual website searches, search engines, search aggregators, or RSS feeds.
Nope
Social networking sites (such as Myspace, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram), chat or discussion forums/groups (such as Yahoo! Groups), Twitter feeds, Usenet newsgroups or email lists.
Ta hell with social media
Blogs, personal web pages and most fansites (negative ones included), except those written by a recognized authority. (This exception for blogs, etc., controlled by recognized authorities is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities who are individuals always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for people.)
WTF, how is anything on Wikipedia?
Open wikis, except those with a substantial history of stability and a substantial number of editors. Mirrors or forks of Wikipedia should not be linked.
Nope.
Sites that are only indirectly related to the article's subject: the link should be directly related to the subject of the article. A general site that has information about a variety of subjects should usually not be linked from an article on a more specific subject. Similarly, a website on a specific subject should usually not be linked from an article about a general subject. If a section of a general website is devoted to the subject of the article, and meets the other criteria for linking, then that part of the site could be deep linked.
SWC is DIRECTLY about SHADOW WARRIOR.
Lists of links to manufacturers, suppliers or customers.
Nope.
Sites already linked through Wikipedia sourcing tools.[5] For example, instead of linking to a commercial book site, consider the "ISBN" linking format, which gives readers an opportunity to search a wide variety of free and non-free book sources. Map sources can be linked by using geographical coordinates.
Nope.
Sites that are not reliably functional and/or not likely to continue being functional. For example, links to temporary internet content, where the link is unlikely to remain operable for a useful amount of time.
Weebly has proven to be a very reliable host. SWC is 2 years OLDER than Wikipedia.
Affiliate, tracking or referral links, i.e., links that contain information about who is to be credited for readers that follow the link. If the source itself is helpful, use a neutral link without the tracking information.
Huh? Nope.
External links on Wikipedia navigation templates or navigation pages such as disambiguation, redirect and category pages.
Websites of organizations mentioned in an article—unless they otherwise qualify as something that should be linked or considered.[5][7]
Nope.
Put SWC in the damn links section!