Duke4.net Forums: Bombshell - Duke4.net Forums

Jump to content

  • 53 Pages +
  • « First
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Bombshell

User is offline   Steve 64 

#991

Sorry didn't know that was there Thanks for showing me
1

User is offline   MusicallyInspired 

  • The Sarien Encounter

#992

Ugh I hate these type of forum systems. Why are they getting so popular? Everyone seems to be switching over. It reminds me of the really old bulletin board systems before phpBB and YaBB/SMF.
5

User is offline   Steve 64 

#993

I like it the old way better
2

User is offline   Mblackwell 

  • Evil Overlord

#994

Light weight and easy to browse on a phone. I hate it though.
0

User is offline   MusicallyInspired 

  • The Sarien Encounter

#995

They have mobile schemes for standard forum designs. I hate this new design.
0

#996

Anyone going to buy it at release? Would want to hear how the game is from someone experienced.. (You know who you are)
-1

User is offline   Player Lin 

#997

View PostMusicallyInspired, on 26 January 2016 - 09:16 AM, said:

Ugh I hate these type of forum systems. Why are they getting so popular? Everyone seems to be switching over. It reminds me of the really old bulletin board systems before phpBB and YaBB/SMF.


*sigh*

Websites and Forums nowadays seems like doing that shit, default with mobile UI...even user is using desktop system.


At least give us a different option for non-mobile system user... :dukeaffirmative:


That's why I didn't use Windows 8 and later. Stick on Win 7 and refuse to upgrade to the free Win 10.

This post has been edited by Player Lin: 27 January 2016 - 04:06 AM

0

User is offline   Jenz/Amaka 

#998

2 Days... I just hope Bombshell runs well. RoTT still runs awful even with new PC.

Actually I hope everything about Bombshell will be great. This is Interceptors chance to be either well known or be known as bad devs.
0

User is offline   Inspector Lagomorf 

  • Glory To Motherland!

#999

View PostJenz/Amaka, on 27 January 2016 - 08:54 AM, said:

This is Interceptors chance to be either well known or be known as bad devs.


3D Realms. Not Interceptor. :dukeaffirmative:
0

User is offline   Hendricks266 

  • Weaponized Autism

  #1000

View PostInspector Lagomorf, on 27 January 2016 - 09:26 AM, said:

3D Realms. Not Interceptor. :dukeaffirmative:

Wrong. Interceptor is developing the game. 3D Realms simply owns the IP.
0

User is offline   LkMax 

#1001

At that point they are the same thing, no?
3D Realms is only a shell of its former self.
0

User is offline   HulkNukem 

#1002

Lets be honest, this would look bad on both Interceptor and 3DRealms if it flops, they kinda both need eachother at this point.
0

#1003

So Bombshell comes exactly 20 years after Duke Nukem 3D. Duke 3D came out 29th of January 1996. Bombshell comes out same date but 20 years later. I never knew that until someone mentioned Gearbox and anniversary :dukeaffirmative:
2

User is offline   FistMarine 

#1004

edit

This post has been edited by FistMarine: 11 December 2016 - 06:29 AM

0

#1005

Unfortunately it happens to be right after the release of that Tomb Raider game that's been getting media coverage like crazy.

Well, it's better than releasing right after Fallout 4 in any case.
0

User is offline   Lunick 

#1006

It might seem like Bombshell is getting zero media coverage but that is because the game is review embargoed until launch.
1

User is offline   Micky C 

  • Honored Donor

#1007

Is that a bad sign or has it simply become standard practice these days? I mean if 3DR were super confident in the game you'd think the positive reviews before release would increase sales.
1

User is offline   Lunick 

#1008

According to Fred, offering pre-orders for a game means you are not confident with it.
0

User is offline   Jenz/Amaka 

#1009

And it seems nobody knows this game. None of my friends knew this game and there's barely any marketing at all.
0

#1010

Ho-ly shit.
Posted Image
1

User is offline   Inspector Lagomorf 

  • Glory To Motherland!

#1011

View PostJenz/Amaka, on 29 January 2016 - 05:47 AM, said:

And it seems nobody knows this game. None of my friends knew this game and there's barely any marketing at all.


Yeah, this is going to be a marketing flop.
1

User is offline   LkMax 

#1012

View PostSonaria The Druid, on 29 January 2016 - 07:50 AM, said:

Ho-ly shit.

:dukeaffirmative:
Really?
0

User is offline   Mr. Tibbs 

#1013

First review from a named site is up and it's not pretty. 2.5/10 from Destructoid.

Update:
2/10 from Gamespot.

Quote

Bad, boring, and broken: It’s a special hat trick performed only by the most special of games and the only accomplishment Bombshell is likely to be remembered for, if it will indeed be remembered at all. Until now, this isometric shooter was known primarily for its laughably awful initial trailer, and at least deserves dubious praise for living up to its marketing’s expectations; it is as underdeveloped and unexciting as our introduction to it.


4/10 from Tech Raptor.
http://techraptor.ne...-dud-on-arrival

http://wccftech.com/...l-review-nukem/

Quote

Is Bombshell good? I wanted to like Bombshell, but with how repetitive it is, the bad visual design and generally how little it offers, it’s hard to recommend it.


2/5 from Hardcore Gamer.
http://www.hardcoreg...mbshell/190023/

2.5/10 from EGM Now.
http://www.egmnow.co...mbshell-review/

5.8/10 from MMORPG
http://www.mmorpg.co.../Bombshell.html

1.5/5 from PC World
http://www.pcworld.c...bad-than-badass

4.5/10 from Game Watcher
http://www.gamewatch...ll-review/12455

Quote

Bombshell isn’t the worst game I’ve ever played, but it’s among the most dull and uninteresting.


2/5 from Saving Content
http://www.savingcon...mbshell-review/

Negative review from Arstechnica
http://arstechnica.c...h-of-your-time/

This post has been edited by Mr. Tibbs: 29 January 2016 - 12:59 PM

0

User is offline   Mr. Tibbs 

#1014

Launch trailer.

1

User is offline   Inspector Lagomorf 

  • Glory To Motherland!

#1015

View PostMr. Tibbs, on 29 January 2016 - 09:41 AM, said:

First review from a named site is up and it's not pretty.
<litany of bad reviews>


Cue the rabid fans saying that reviewers are hating on 3D Realms.

Edit: In retrospect, perhaps calling the game "bombshell" may not have been the wisest idea. :dukeaffirmative:

This post has been edited by Inspector Lagomorf: 29 January 2016 - 10:22 AM

2

User is offline   Mr. Tibbs 

#1016

LGR's review.

1

User is offline   Bloodshot 

#1017

ouch
2

#1018

3DR was expecting a Nancy Grace-style bombshell that would shake up gamers, but instead it's going to be a bomb, box-office style.
1

User is offline   Steve 64 

#1019

Well hopefully that the prequel will be better then the main game since some of the top talent from Duke4.net is working on it.
4

#1020

So rise of the triad wasn't just an unlucky try..
3

Share this topic:


  • 53 Pages +
  • « First
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • Last »
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic


All copyrights and trademarks not owned by Voidpoint, LLC are the sole property of their respective owners. Play Ion Fury! ;) © Voidpoint, LLC

Enter your sign in name and password


Sign in options