The Post Thread
#6992 Posted 10 October 2012 - 12:59 PM
Lunick, on 09 October 2012 - 10:21 PM, said:
What the hell its out!? Buying this instant. There we go, now to enjoy some 8-bit paradise.
#6993 Posted 10 October 2012 - 02:08 PM
Ripemanewone, on 10 October 2012 - 12:59 PM, said:
Yeah, after something like almost 10 years?
#6994 Posted 10 October 2012 - 02:35 PM
Lunick, on 10 October 2012 - 02:08 PM, said:
Yeah, it's like the DNF of indie games, I'm impressed so far though. I haven't done many missions, just tearing it up in free roam mode which seems as addictive as the original GTA so far. The sheer amount of 80's references so far is staggering, you can tell every inch of the game is a labour of love. Cool music too.
#6995 Posted 10 October 2012 - 03:09 PM
#6997 Posted 10 October 2012 - 08:14 PM
This post has been edited by Hank: 10 October 2012 - 08:19 PM
#6998 Posted 11 October 2012 - 11:07 AM
#6999 Posted 11 October 2012 - 11:10 AM
#7001 Posted 11 October 2012 - 03:13 PM
Rory, on 11 October 2012 - 03:10 PM, said:
I like people who tell it's as it is.
With your powers of deception you could give Marty McFly a run for his money.
#7003 Posted 11 October 2012 - 11:12 PM
Burnett, on 08 October 2012 - 09:02 AM, said:
When my dad owned a motorcycle, I always bugged him about growing a ponytail. Unfortunately, due to a bike accident about 6-7 years ago, he sold his bike. He was driving slowly through a construction zone on the Trans Canada Highway somewhere in Ontario where the person in front of him slammed on the brakes hard. He doesn't have the reflexes like he used to (getting old probably does that), so he didn't brake in time and his leg smashed up against the bumper of the car in front of him. He shattered his shin bone. He was only going around 20 km/h.
Fortunately when he got home, his wife and I were looking after him. I went to the drug store and bought him some crutches as I recall.
So instead of owning a motorcycle, he now has a Mazda Miata.
This post has been edited by Jeff: 11 October 2012 - 11:14 PM
#7004 Posted 12 October 2012 - 04:48 AM
The European Union?
The same European Union that is currently going through this:
You could have given the Nobel Peace Prize to Occupy Wall Street, and that probably would have made more sense than giving it to the European Union.
Jesus Christ.
#7005 Posted 12 October 2012 - 05:12 AM
For example, Bush was nominated, despite being responsible for a war. And Obama won because, I don't know, popularity?
#7006 Posted 12 October 2012 - 09:11 AM
Achenar, on 12 October 2012 - 04:48 AM, said:
The European Union?
Fox, on 12 October 2012 - 05:12 AM, said:
The Nobel Peace Prize isn't worth that much nowadays, indeed. The winners are elected by politicians and therefore it is often more a political statement than a reward for an individual's dedication to peace and understanding.
#7007 Posted 12 October 2012 - 09:15 AM
LeoD, on 12 October 2012 - 09:11 AM, said:
That may be so, but a good time to award the Nobel Peace Prize to them would have been at the fall of the Berlin Wall (instead they gave it to Gorby), not at this very moment when its very economic existence is in jeopardy.
#7008 Posted 12 October 2012 - 09:40 AM
This post has been edited by Sangman: 12 October 2012 - 09:40 AM
#7009 Posted 12 October 2012 - 09:47 AM
Sangman, on 12 October 2012 - 09:40 AM, said:
#7010 Posted 12 October 2012 - 11:30 AM
How do you give a federation the Nobel Peace Prize? They are getting pretty silly with that thing lately.
The truly worst part about Obama winning it was that when he accepted it, he went on to justify war. Accepting a prize for peace, he justified war
#7011 Posted 12 October 2012 - 11:50 AM
Mr.Flibble, on 12 October 2012 - 11:30 AM, said:
Mr.Flibble, on 12 October 2012 - 11:30 AM, said:
Mr.Flibble, on 12 October 2012 - 11:30 AM, said:
Now back to the second half of today's more important event.
#7013 Posted 13 October 2012 - 08:39 PM
P.S. Why constant downvoting is abuse while upvoting isn't?
#7014 Posted 13 October 2012 - 10:46 PM
Burnett, on 13 October 2012 - 08:39 PM, said:
You've brought that up several times in other threads haven't you? Or was that someone else.
#7016 Posted 14 October 2012 - 12:03 AM
This post has been edited by Lunick: 14 October 2012 - 12:16 AM
#7017 Posted 14 October 2012 - 03:22 AM
This post has been edited by Marked: 14 October 2012 - 03:25 AM
#7018 Posted 14 October 2012 - 04:21 AM
Burnett, on 13 October 2012 - 08:39 PM, said:
Yeah I'm wondering the same thing. People get all pissy when being downvoted but don't question being upvoted even for shitty posts. It creates a very distorted view - ie. morons with a rep of 200+ because almost nobody ever downvotes.
disclaimer: no this does not mean I think everyone with a rep of more than 200 is automatically an idiot
This post has been edited by Sangman: 14 October 2012 - 04:21 AM
#7019 Posted 14 October 2012 - 04:28 AM
Yatta, on 13 October 2012 - 11:56 PM, said:
That was hilarious... but as per tradition I still have to downvote you.
It didn't help that you put my avatar so late in the vid.
#7020 Posted 14 October 2012 - 04:46 AM
Micky C, on 14 October 2012 - 04:28 AM, said:
I was too mesmerized by yatta to pay any attention to when my avatar showed up.